Shai
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,507 
|
Post by Shai on Mar 30, 2016 13:37:09 GMT -5
Me and my husband got into a "discussion" (argument) because I said I was looking forward to TO:Dallas more then Wrestlemania. To me TO just has an all around better card.
|
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Mar 30, 2016 13:44:51 GMT -5
I am too. Nakamura/Zayn, Bayley/Asuka, AA/Revival, Balor/Joe will probably all be better matches than anything on the Mania card other than Ambrose/Lesnar IMO. Not to mention the NXT debut of A Double. If you like the entertainment aspect of WWE more, then Wrestlemania will be more to your liking. With the elaborate entrances/skits/musical guests, etc.... If you like wrestling, then TO Dallas is for you.
|
|
Shai
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,507
|
Post by Shai on Mar 30, 2016 13:48:00 GMT -5
I am too. Nakamura/Zayn, Bayley/Asuka, AA/Revival, Balor/Joe will probably all be better matches than anything on the Mania card other than Ambrose/Lesnar IMO. Not to mention the NXT debut of A Double. If you like the entertainment aspect of WWE more, then Wrestlemania will be more to your liking. With the elaborate entrances/skits/musical guests, etc.... If you like wrestling, then TO Dallas is for you. THIS. I like the cool stuff too but NXT has rekindled my love of actual wrestling. |
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Mar 30, 2016 13:52:07 GMT -5
I'm looking forward to both, honestly. If American Alpha lose to the fake Andersons though, I'm going to automatically think WrestleMania was the better show.
|
|
|
|
Post by sonofblaine on Mar 30, 2016 13:55:28 GMT -5
I said in another thread that between Wrestlemania (which was the first in 15 years I was watching live, with friends as an event) and Takeover (watching the morning after, probably on my phone), I was still looking forward to NXT more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Instant Classic on Mar 30, 2016 14:12:15 GMT -5
Not me, Lesnar vs Ambrose trumps all of Takeover.
|
|
|
|
Post by froggyfrog on Mar 30, 2016 14:13:15 GMT -5
I'm kind of into both cards Takeover will be better imo and I'm looking forward to more matches on it than Mania, but I do think Dean vs Brock is the match of the weekend
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bad Kahuna on Mar 30, 2016 14:16:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Mar 30, 2016 14:19:16 GMT -5
Takeover has a better card.
Well no shit. Half of it's big stars aren't on the shelf.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bad Kahuna on Mar 30, 2016 14:19:24 GMT -5
I'm looking forward to both, honestly. If American Alpha lose to the fake Andersons though, I'm going to automatically think WrestleMania was the better show. No worries  |
|
AtomSmasher
Trap-Jaw
"Measue it twice...cut it once"
Posts: 409
|
Post by AtomSmasher on Mar 30, 2016 14:34:20 GMT -5
Takeover with no hesitation.
Undertaker/Shane is a match I'd like as a stunt show appetizer to a couple of other main events. Not the main attraction.
Lesnar/Ambrose is about all i want to see. Why we haven't got Styles/Owens is a mystery to me.
Takeover is far more intriguing and i know i'll see quality wrestling.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,310
|
Post by Push R Truth on Mar 30, 2016 14:39:07 GMT -5
In my opinion:
Takeover will more than likely have better wrestling. But Wrestlemania is going to blow it out of the water with "the Entertainment".
All in all, I don't see why so many people see this as one VS the other. Shit, watch both!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Raskovnik on Mar 30, 2016 14:49:45 GMT -5
The only match I care about on the Takeover card is Nakamura's just to see what his theme is and how he comes off. I like Corbin but dislike Aries, like Asuka but am indifferent to Bayley, the tag match should be solid, and hopefully Joe beats that vanilla midget Balor so Balor can go on Raw and maybe find a character. Ambrose vs Lesnar beats everything else on it for me.
|
|
