|
|
Post by dxbang on Aug 8, 2016 17:27:09 GMT -5
Are you all truly entertained by the women's division? I fast forward through just about everything. The wrestling is as if late 80s stiff mid carder are trying to perform moves they can't quite execute (except these women seem to be in incredible shape instead of roided to the gills like the guys im comparing them to).
I know this board has an unusual amount of love for Sasha Banks and Bayley, but even they are just ok. Maybe it helps in terms of bringing in younger female fans, but I don't think it makes a big enough difference.
|
|
cool
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,195 
|
Post by cool on Aug 8, 2016 17:28:53 GMT -5
I am. Sasha is one of the best on the roster atm.
|
|
|
|
Post by schizo on Aug 8, 2016 17:42:11 GMT -5
Funny that this thread pops up after we had one of the best matches of the year 2 weeks ago with charolette and sasha and a ginuene feel good moment with Sasha's win
So nope, don't agree with the op at all
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 17:42:41 GMT -5
I've found pretty much 99.8% of the divas revolution to be same old same old with maybe slightly better wrestling but not by much.Ric Flair was the top heel of the divison for months,They booked Charlotte like she was Nikki Bella,Becky lost all the time and Sasha existed.The title change between Sasha/Charlotte was their best performance since getting called up.This past year of divas revolting has made me yearn the golden age of Nikki Bella.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 17:44:43 GMT -5
You mean like SmackDown having two women's matches and neither one happening?
#WomensRevolution
|
|
Big Poppa Pumpkin
Dennis Stamp
I'll be in the back polishing............ my belt.
Posts: 4,987 
|
Post by Big Poppa Pumpkin on Aug 8, 2016 17:50:14 GMT -5
tbh I think it was a hideous mistake to split the women between two brands because I don't think the depth of talent is there (yet) in the company to justify it.
BUT there's no doubt in my mind that the standard of women's wrestling in WWE right now is better than it has ever been, as is the company's presentation of it (though there are plenty of flaws, they're getting there).
|
|
AFN: Judge Shred
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wanted to change his doohicky.
Member of The Bluetista Buyers Club
Posts: 18,221
|
Post by AFN: Judge Shred on Aug 8, 2016 18:02:40 GMT -5
Funny that this thread pops up after we had one of the best matches of the year 2 weeks ago with charolette and sasha and a ginuene feel good moment with Sasha's win So nope, don't agree with the op at all The day after that match and a few months after making him watch Sasha v Bayley, my friend texts me "So what is worse, women's wrestling or women's basketball." Got dang idjit. |
|
Pushed to the Moon
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Tony Schiavone in Disguise
Working myself into a shoot
Posts: 15,819
|
Post by Pushed to the Moon on Aug 8, 2016 18:03:46 GMT -5
If you fast forward it how do you know it's bad? (To be fair I do the same thing with Sheamus, Kane or Del rio matches mostly).
I like Sasha, Charlotte and Becky. Their promo skills are still works in progress but they have some excellent matches. Then again there are very few men I want to hear talk these days either. The only fastforwardable woman to me is Natalya. Total buzzkiller.
|
|
JoDaNa1281
Crow T. Robot
Jackie Daytona, Regular Human Bartender. #BLM
Posts: 40,142
|
Post by JoDaNa1281 on Aug 8, 2016 18:04:01 GMT -5
Like with the men, it really depends on who's performing.
|
|
kidkamikaze10
Dennis Stamp
Trying to think of a new avatar
Posts: 4,274
|
Post by kidkamikaze10 on Aug 8, 2016 18:53:00 GMT -5
Like with the men, it really depends on who's performing. Bingo. I don't generalize women's wrestling. Like men, there are performers I like, and performers I don't. |
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Aug 8, 2016 19:34:06 GMT -5
Other than Nattie, yeah, yeah I enjoy it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Aug 10, 2016 1:52:48 GMT -5
It's one of my favorite things aboot the shows. It always has been.
|
|
