|
|
Post by mauled on Aug 12, 2017 6:17:28 GMT -5
Ok I'm watching some of the greatest rivalries on the Network and there are 2 huge omissions both involving Austin. While his rivalry with Vince is on there, they have done nothing on either his rivalry with Bret or with The Rock. I mean common neither should require much of explanation for those 2 great feuds.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2017 18:24:21 GMT -5
They gave up on that series too fast but you'd think Stone Cold's rivalries would be some of the first.On a similar note in 2010/2011 when wwe released the Bret vs Shawn Rivalry DVD set they were scheduled to do a Rock vs Austin DVD set but when the Bret/Hbk one sold so poorly they scrapped the Rock/Austin one.
|
|
|
|
Post by mauled on Aug 13, 2017 6:37:00 GMT -5
They gave up on that series too fast but you'd think Stone Cold's rivalries would be some of the first.On a similar note in 2010/2011 when wwe released the Bret vs Shawn Rivalry DVD set they were scheduled to do a Rock vs Austin DVD set but when the Bret/Hbk one sold so poorly they scrapped the Rock/Austin one. That maybe true but yet they have time to talk about the HBK/Trips rivalry and call it one of the greatest ever 😕 Now it wasn't bad don't get me wrong but the best match was always the first one and it went on far to long. It sure as hell shouldn't have billing over either Austin/Rock or Austin/Bret hell its not even as good as Rock/Trips which in both 98 with DX and the Nation and 2000 as Singles Stars was great |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2017 12:52:59 GMT -5
They gave up on that series too fast but you'd think Stone Cold's rivalries would be some of the first.On a similar note in 2010/2011 when wwe released the Bret vs Shawn Rivalry DVD set they were scheduled to do a Rock vs Austin DVD set but when the Bret/Hbk one sold so poorly they scrapped the Rock/Austin one. That maybe true but yet they have time to talk about the HBK/Trips rivalry and call it one of the greatest ever 😕 Now it wasn't bad don't get me wrong but the best match was always the first one and it went on far to long. It sure as hell shouldn't have billing over either Austin/Rock or Austin/Bret hell its not even as good as Rock/Trips which in both 98 with DX and the Nation and 2000 as Singles Stars was great People say I'm crazy when I say this but I think HHH knows somebody in the company with a lot of power. |
|
|
|
Post by mauled on Aug 13, 2017 13:38:21 GMT -5
That maybe true but yet they have time to talk about the HBK/Trips rivalry and call it one of the greatest ever 😕 Now it wasn't bad don't get me wrong but the best match was always the first one and it went on far to long. It sure as hell shouldn't have billing over either Austin/Rock or Austin/Bret hell its not even as good as Rock/Trips which in both 98 with DX and the Nation and 2000 as Singles Stars was great People say I'm crazy when I say this but I think HHH knows somebody in the company with a lot of power. 👏 |
|
DZ: WF Legacy
King Koopa
Porcupine Tree
Posts: 12,107
Member is Online
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Aug 13, 2017 20:52:36 GMT -5
Yeah, it seems like they almost immediately gave up on this series, which is unfortunate. They could definitely advertise this kind of thing better, and not just in quick snippets in trailers, but a few minute promotional segment on Raw or something.
This one and Wrestlemania Rewind need to make a comeback.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Barber on Aug 13, 2017 21:06:02 GMT -5
...they were scheduled to do a Rock vs Austin DVD set but when the Bret/Hbk one sold so poorly they scrapped the Rock/Austin one. What did they expect? They should have started off with Austin/Rock or Hogan/Macho Man (yes, I know both were on the outs with the company at the time) instead of those two. Besides, everyone was tired of the Montreal Screwjob at that point. |
|
