Post by nisidhe on Sept 13, 2017 14:15:44 GMT -5
I ask this because it certainly feels like an alternative narrative for that feud. Villain gets into pure babyface's head and corrupts him.
Of course, there may be variations because of the characters because Kendrick is a rather unknown quantity in his psychology vs. what we know of Wyatt's character, and because Gallagher's not as knowing of Kendrick's tactics as Balor is of Wyatt's. However, it would seem that the two feuds are working with the same basic structure but possibly with two very different outcomes. It's intriguing as this was a common trope of Shakespeare's in creating a subplot to reflect/mirror or provide an alternative outcome to that of the main plot.
Thoughts?
Of course, there may be variations because of the characters because Kendrick is a rather unknown quantity in his psychology vs. what we know of Wyatt's character, and because Gallagher's not as knowing of Kendrick's tactics as Balor is of Wyatt's. However, it would seem that the two feuds are working with the same basic structure but possibly with two very different outcomes. It's intriguing as this was a common trope of Shakespeare's in creating a subplot to reflect/mirror or provide an alternative outcome to that of the main plot.
Thoughts?
