|
|
Post by Baby, it’s Jes outside on Nov 21, 2017 13:04:45 GMT -5
Not a matter of should as much as when will it happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mister Pigwell on Nov 21, 2017 13:06:29 GMT -5
Why would this happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunderbolt on Nov 21, 2017 13:06:39 GMT -5
I don't know if she'll go that far, but I'm repeating my prediction that Stephanie McMahon will defeat Ronda Rousey at some point, very possibly by armbar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Nov 21, 2017 13:13:57 GMT -5
Ok, THAT would get me to stop watching.
....
...actually, no. I'd keep watching because that sounds like an entertaining car wreck. So by virtue of that, it would make me ironically interested in Stephanie.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,324
|
Post by Push R Truth on Nov 21, 2017 13:15:21 GMT -5
I can totally see Steph winning and unifying the two Women's Titles.
In fact, I'm nearly willing to bet that was the first thing mentioned as a "this is our plan if the second title doesn't work" when they made the second belt.
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,271 
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Nov 21, 2017 13:15:31 GMT -5
<USA Network> See, THIS is what we mean when we say that RAW needs a Commanding Female Presence that the entire show is centered around!
|
|
AlexaBliss4Life
Unicron
Alexa Bliss is the Queen the wrestling world needs!
Posts: 2,610 
|
Post by AlexaBliss4Life on Nov 21, 2017 13:16:36 GMT -5
I don't know if she'll go that far, but I'm repeating my prediction that Stephanie McMahon will defeat Ronda Rousey at some point, very possibly by armbar. She does that, I swear I'll kill something.. |
|
|
|
Post by The Rick Jericho on Nov 21, 2017 13:36:43 GMT -5
 She does look good with gold. But like someone said here. Make her unify the women's titles. 1 title on 2 brands and a 16 person division. |
|
|
|
Post by YAKMAN is ICHIBAN on Nov 21, 2017 13:37:21 GMT -5
Only if she wears a doo rag.
|
|
Rican
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
July 17, 2011 - HHHe called it
Posts: 16,520
|
Post by Rican on Nov 21, 2017 14:02:06 GMT -5
Ok, NOW we're going a little overboard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Final Countdown Jones on Nov 21, 2017 14:09:42 GMT -5
It's really hard to tell hyperbole from serious when it comes to peoples' dislike of Stephanie McMahon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baby, it’s Jes outside on Nov 21, 2017 14:42:02 GMT -5
It's really hard to tell hyperbole from serious when it comes to peoples' dislike of Stephanie McMahon. In this case, it's hyperbole. But Stephanie "winning" either women's title wouldn't be that surprising. |
|
|
|
Post by Final Countdown Jones on Nov 21, 2017 14:46:28 GMT -5
It's really hard to tell hyperbole from serious when it comes to peoples' dislike of Stephanie McMahon. In this case, it's hyperbole. But Stephanie "winning" either women's title wouldn't be that surprising. It would be a surprise right now because she hasn't had a match in years and there's no indication she's going to have one any time soon, and yet it gets brought up any time she's mentioned like we've been told it's going to be. This is what I'm talking about; people are holding against her something they decided is an inevitability without any reason to actually believe it is. |
|
FinalGwen
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Particularly fond of muffins.
Posts: 16,455
Member is Online
|
Post by FinalGwen on Nov 21, 2017 14:49:53 GMT -5
Eh, last match she had was longer and better than most of Brock's matches.  |
|
Perd
Patti Mayonnaise
Leslie needs to butt out for fear of receiving The Bunghole Buster
Posts: 32,059
|
Post by Perd on Nov 21, 2017 14:52:02 GMT -5
I absolutely want her to tap out Ronda Rousey.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baby, it’s Jes outside on Nov 21, 2017 14:53:20 GMT -5
In this case, it's hyperbole. But Stephanie "winning" either women's title wouldn't be that surprising. It would be a surprise right now because she hasn't had a match in years and there's no indication she's going to have one any time soon, and yet it gets brought up any time she's mentioned like we've been told it's going to be. This is what I'm talking about; people are holding against her something they decided is an inevitability without any reason to actually believe it is. If wins and losses don't matter anyway, Steph's lack of in-ring experience wouldn't matter. She could just strip the title from whomever (VERY likely in any scenario), and award it to herself. Hell, she's taken credit for the women's revolution. In her mind, she's the perfect person to be champion. I'm not using hyperbole anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by Final Countdown Jones on Nov 21, 2017 15:00:15 GMT -5
It would be a surprise right now because she hasn't had a match in years and there's no indication she's going to have one any time soon, and yet it gets brought up any time she's mentioned like we've been told it's going to be. This is what I'm talking about; people are holding against her something they decided is an inevitability without any reason to actually believe it is. If wins and losses don't matter anyway, Steph's lack of in-ring experience wouldn't matter. She could just strip the title from whomever (VERY likely in any scenario), and award it to herself. Hell, she's taken credit for the women's revolution. In her mind, she's the perfect person to be champion. I'm not using hyperbole anymore. No but I don't mean she "doesn't have experience" I mean that like. She's not wrestling right now. She's not doing any of that, and you don't know what she's thinking or if she believes she's the perfect person to be champion, and when that is the genuine stance you're taking then it's exactly what I mean about the real stuff being indistinguishable from hyperbole. You're writing Stephanie McMahon fanfiction and ascribing it to what she really thinks. |
|
|
|
Post by Rudy Gobert Fadeaway on Nov 21, 2017 15:00:53 GMT -5
Would that make her The Queen Dom?
|
|
MrElijah
Crow T. Robot
Posts: 43,493
Member is Online
|
Post by MrElijah on Nov 21, 2017 15:50:42 GMT -5
Ok, THAT would get me to stop watching. .... ...actually, no. I'd keep watching because that sounds like an entertaining car wreck. So by virtue of that, it would make me ironically interested in Stephanie. WON Bryan: How....Just how?! Meltz: Y'know..*coughs* Bryan: How the hell AJ Styles got a legitimate 4 star match outta Stephanie?! Meltz: *coughs some more* y'see....yeah! |
|
|
|
Post by Baby, it’s Jes outside on Nov 21, 2017 16:08:14 GMT -5
If wins and losses don't matter anyway, Steph's lack of in-ring experience wouldn't matter. She could just strip the title from whomever (VERY likely in any scenario), and award it to herself. Hell, she's taken credit for the women's revolution. In her mind, she's the perfect person to be champion. I'm not using hyperbole anymore. No but I don't mean she "doesn't have experience" I mean that like. She's not wrestling right now. She's not doing any of that, and you don't know what she's thinking or if she believes she's the perfect person to be champion, and when that is the genuine stance you're taking then it's exactly what I mean about the real stuff being indistinguishable from hyperbole. You're writing Stephanie McMahon fanfiction and ascribing it to what she really thinks. The character Stephanie McMahon considers herself to be greater than the entire women's roster already. It's not a huge leap to think she would just decide to take the championship for herself. |
|
