|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Mar 18, 2007 0:30:40 GMT -5
So I toldja all of the suckiness of number 23 last week.. welp caught a bargain showing of Ghost Rider..phew.
The positives.
Eva Mendes was hot.
Sam Elliot was Sam Elliot- the man is always awesome even in steaming piles o' crap.
The negatives.
Pretty much everything else. I hope Nic Cage got a good chunk o' cash.. cuz wow, this flick was terrible.
And ya'll know me, I'm usually not all negative.. but woof what a bad slate of movie going of late. Hopefully when I get the chance to see 300, it'll make up for these back to back turkeys.
|
|
|
|
Post by feelingfroggy on Mar 18, 2007 0:31:34 GMT -5
I heard 300 is pretty good
|
|
AmandaJ
Don Corleone
My heart...after you broke it.
Posts: 1,969
|
Post by AmandaJ on Mar 18, 2007 0:42:10 GMT -5
I've heard that 300 is relaly really good. I want to see it. My friend said Ghostrider was okay, btu not that great. I didn't realy have any interest in seeing it.
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Mar 18, 2007 0:44:46 GMT -5
All I need to know about Ghost Rider is that it made Paul London (of all people) fall asleep. Somebody with that much zany energy getting ko'ed by a movie must be a sign.
|
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Mar 18, 2007 1:24:38 GMT -5
I saw 300 tonight. It was indeed good. I recommend it to anyone who enjoys their blood and gore.  And Eva Mendes being hot is always a positive. |
|
|
|
Post by REDUNBECK~! on Mar 18, 2007 6:09:40 GMT -5
300 is frickin' great (if you love senseless violence). I think it could make up for just about any bad movie.
|
|
Lick Ness Monster
Dennis Stamp
From the eerie, eerie depths of Lake Okabena
Posts: 4,874
|
Post by Lick Ness Monster on Mar 18, 2007 6:25:46 GMT -5
"Zodiac" is a great movie. And "23", while technically a bad film, at least held my interest, which was far from the case with "Because I Said So" (yes, I saw it) and "Epic Movie."
|
|
|
|
Post by THE Dinobot on Mar 18, 2007 6:39:44 GMT -5
Everyone who tells me about 300 tells me it's a steaming pile o' crap, in the same sense as to what fell on Biff.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrath on Mar 18, 2007 6:41:00 GMT -5
300 is great! SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Mar 18, 2007 6:41:55 GMT -5
I didn't mind ghost rider
I wouldn't say it was great like Spiderman or Batman begins but as far as comic movies go you can find worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Palatial Regalia on Mar 18, 2007 9:14:56 GMT -5
300 is overrated.
|
|
jzbadblood
Unicron
Christ, man. Can't you see what's happening? Can't you read between the lines?
Posts: 3,052
|
Post by jzbadblood on Mar 18, 2007 10:49:54 GMT -5
Ghost Rider looked terrible from the commercials. I guess I was right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie Finster on Mar 18, 2007 11:44:27 GMT -5
I saw 300 yesterday and it's got it's moments. I'm a history buff so I was trying to distinguish fact from fiction in that. I knew the story beforehand so I knew what would happen. I'm pretty immune to blood and gore in movies plus the blood looked somewhat unrealistic and it was too much "Hollywood" for me with the elephants, rhinos, etc. to stay historically accurate.
But besides that it's a fine movie. Not great, but not bad. If they actually shot on location and made everything look realer it would have helped.
|
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
Post by NIXON on Mar 18, 2007 12:08:01 GMT -5
I saw 300 yesterday and it's got it's moments. I'm a history buff so I was trying to distinguish fact from fiction in that. I knew the story beforehand so I knew what would happen. I'm pretty immune to blood and gore in movies plus the blood looked somewhat unrealistic and it was too much "Hollywood" for me with the elephants, rhinos, etc. to stay historically accurate. But besides that it's a fine movie. Not great, but not bad. If they actually shot on location and made everything look realer it would have helped. You know its based on a graphic novel and not supposed to be historically accurate or look real right? Though i do find it hilarious that it was the elephants and rhinos and not the guy with saws for arms or the countless other monsters that made it lack realism for you. |
|
The Line
Patti Mayonnaise
Real Name: Bumkiss. Stanley Bumkiss.
Peanut Butter & JAAAAAMMMM!
Posts: 36,698
|
Post by The Line on Mar 18, 2007 12:33:45 GMT -5
I actually liked 23.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie Finster on Mar 18, 2007 12:46:08 GMT -5
I saw 300 yesterday and it's got it's moments. I'm a history buff so I was trying to distinguish fact from fiction in that. I knew the story beforehand so I knew what would happen. I'm pretty immune to blood and gore in movies plus the blood looked somewhat unrealistic and it was too much "Hollywood" for me with the elephants, rhinos, etc. to stay historically accurate. But besides that it's a fine movie. Not great, but not bad. If they actually shot on location and made everything look realer it would have helped. I was going by the History Channel, not some novel. And yeah, the hunchback, the man-beasts and all those made it unrealistic for me also. Not to mention Spartans had chest and shin armor. You know its based on a graphic novel and not supposed to be historically accurate or look real right? Though i do find it hilarious that it was the elephants and rhinos and not the guy with saws for arms or the countless other monsters that made it lack realism for you. |
|
