|
|
Post by hulksmash87 on Jan 30, 2022 14:06:28 GMT -5
Of the three which do you prefer to attend? I gotta go with house show.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cvslfc123 on Jan 31, 2022 8:57:25 GMT -5
House shows are more fun but I've found the crowds to be louder during televised events.
NXT Takeover London was the best crowd I've ever been a part of.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2022 9:06:48 GMT -5
My entire state (WV) has only ever had one PPV, in 1999. We get multiple house shows a year, so a TV taping/PPV is a big deal to me. The closest PPV or television ever gets is a 3.5 hour drive to Columbus, OH.
The 10/30/19 AEW Dynamite was the first TV taping we've had since WCW was here in 2000.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,082
|
Post by Mozenrath on Feb 4, 2022 1:18:05 GMT -5
All things equal, I'd probably want to be at a PPV to see something big happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by David-Arquette was in WCW 2000 on Feb 4, 2022 5:49:05 GMT -5
Never been to a PPV, but found the house shows a better experience overall than the one Smackdown taping I went to back in '04.
|
|
thecrusherwi
El Dandy
the Financially Responsible Man
Brawl For All
Posts: 7,656
|
Post by thecrusherwi on Feb 4, 2022 8:52:29 GMT -5
I've never been to a PPV unfortunately. Closest was a WCW Clash of the Champions show in 1997. House Show blows TV away though. At a House Show, it actually feels like they're performing for the crowd. At a TV taping, you feel like a prop. And at WWE there is so much downtime. I want to a Raw in 2016 and it felt like half the show had the arena dark watching the tron. I'll never go to a WWE TV taping again.
I will say though, the downside of a house show in a place like Green Bay or Milwaukee is that you know 100% that nothing important is going to happen. At a PPV, you might see something big.
|
|
Chiral
Salacious Crumb
Posts: 73,632
Member is Online
|
Post by Chiral on Feb 5, 2022 3:13:37 GMT -5
House show ~ PPV >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TV taping
|
|
