|
Post by Michael Coello on May 13, 2007 17:20:07 GMT -5
It was suppose to be Petey/Kurt vs LAX. Kurt got thrown in after helping Petey out with an LAX ambush. After that. Angle went in alone, but Joe ran out to help. Kurt didn't even say anything during those 2 weeks. Seriously, how can you make that out for a few months, since wasn't playing "All American Hero", but was doing the "Wrestling Machine" thing. LAX just came off the AJ/Daniels fued, and were headed to AMW. You can't give Kurt a midcard feud after he was such a big main eventer a few weeks before. Well, I still thought the Joe/Angle storyline was rushed, if you didn't fine. I get that you are a diehard TNA supporter, that's good and all, but rushing Angle/Joe off the bat 3 times in a row was a mistake,IMO. A feud with the tag champs wouldn't have hurt, and have him and Joe carry on the slow build towards the eventual Joe vs Angle encounter as they're feuding with LAX. But it doesn't matter now as it's gone by the wayside and I could care less for Angle or Joe at this point. So, you're gonna call me a TNA mark, just cause I don't agree with Kurt Angle & Joe teaming to fued with LAX, because it doesn't make sense since it was with Petey soon siding with AMW vs LAX, and where people were angry with Joe not having the world title belt, yet they would somehow magically be happy if they were in a thrown together tag team vs the tag champs, not to mention the fact that having a main eventer suddenly do something middle of the road in the company, like people complained about with Bret Hart when WCW got him, seemed like a misuse of talent? Then, call me a f***ing mark, then.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 13, 2007 17:24:35 GMT -5
How the hell is LAX vs Angle logical? LAX are a tag team. Kurt Angle is a singles competitor. Besides, a man who was recently a world champion trying to fight the tag team champs wouldn't sit well with too many people, as well as make zero sense at the time. Ever heard of one vs. many feuds? Like Rock vs. DX/Regime? Someone needs a history lesson. You mean the McMahon/Helmsley regime,the one that was opposed by The Rock, Mankind(who started the opposition), Vince McMahon in the beginning, most of the locker room, like Steve Austin, The Undertaker, Kane, The Dudley Boyz, Chris Jericho, Too Cool, Steve Blackman and Rikishi?
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on May 13, 2007 17:26:08 GMT -5
Well, I still thought the Joe/Angle storyline was rushed, if you didn't fine. I get that you are a diehard TNA supporter, that's good and all, but rushing Angle/Joe off the bat 3 times in a row was a mistake,IMO. A feud with the tag champs wouldn't have hurt, and have him and Joe carry on the slow build towards the eventual Joe vs Angle encounter as they're feuding with LAX. But it doesn't matter now as it's gone by the wayside and I could care less for Angle or Joe at this point. So, you're gonna call me a TNA mark, just cause I don't agree with Kurt Angle & Joe teaming to fued with LAX, because it doesn't make sense since it was with Petey soon siding with AMW vs LAX, and where people were angry with Joe not having the world title belt, yet they would somehow magically be happy if they were in a thrown together tag team vs the tag champs, not to mention the fact that having a main eventer suddenly do something middle of the road in the company, like people complained about with Bret Hart when WCW got him, seemed like a misuse of talent? Then, call me a waxing mark, then. Whoa, settle down there, you sound upset,lol, hardly worth it over such a discussion. And unlike Hart, they'd actually do something with him as Hart for the first few months only wrestled one match. And you do seem that way, like they could do no wrong, it wasn't really meant as an offense, just noticed that you were very adamant about certain things in TNA most times.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on May 13, 2007 17:31:51 GMT -5
They goto 2 hours and we will get 2.2-2.5 or I'll eat my hat
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 13, 2007 17:35:38 GMT -5
So, you're gonna call me a TNA mark, just cause I don't agree with Kurt Angle & Joe teaming to fued with LAX, because it doesn't make sense since it was with Petey soon siding with AMW vs LAX, and where people were angry with Joe not having the world title belt, yet they would somehow magically be happy if they were in a thrown together tag team vs the tag champs, not to mention the fact that having a main eventer suddenly do something middle of the road in the company, like people complained about with Bret Hart when WCW got him, seemed like a misuse of talent? Then, call me a waxing mark, then. Whoa, settle down there, you sound upset,lol, hardly worth it over such a discussion. And unlike Hart, they'd actually do something with him as Hart for the first few months only wrestled one match. And you do seem that way, like they could do no wrong, it wasn't really meant as an offense, just noticed that you were very adamant about certain things in TNA most times. The reason I get upset is I gotta deal with people who apparently are in the mindset that it's apparently wrong to like TNA, and you either have to be some youtube shooter or extreme diehard to enjoy it. I gotta hear a bunch of people almost every week giving eulogies and excuses for Spike to move the show or cancel it every time the ratings drops down a fraction of a point. I know it damn sure isn't perfect. I can name a couple of things I don't enjoy about TNA, but I do enjoy it with all it's flaws. The problem with me is having to deal with people who get so passionate in their hate that you can't go anywhere without hearing about some new bad thing TNA supposedly did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2007 21:42:02 GMT -5
If TNA would've waited on the Angle-Joe feud. Everyone would be complaining that they're dragging it out too long and missing a huge opportunity and blah, blah, blah.
Everyone can always book better in hindsight. But at the time I didn't hear anyone complaining.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on May 13, 2007 21:44:57 GMT -5
If TNA would've waited on the Angle-Joe feud. Everyone would be complaining that they're dragging it out too long and missing a huge opportunity and blah, blah, blah. Everyone can always book better in hindsight. But at the time I didn't hear anyone complaining. Who's everyone? Things need to be dragged out eventually, but whatever I did mark at first, I won't lie, but then when they kept on putting them against each other 3 months in a row, it kinda killed it for me.
|
|
Glitch
King Koopa
Not Going To Die; Childs, we're goin' out to give Blair the test. If he tries to make it back here and we're not with him... burn him.
Watching you.
Posts: 12,721
|
Post by Glitch on May 13, 2007 22:06:08 GMT -5
Whoa, settle down there, you sound upset,lol, hardly worth it over such a discussion. And unlike Hart, they'd actually do something with him as Hart for the first few months only wrestled one match. And you do seem that way, like they could do no wrong, it wasn't really meant as an offense, just noticed that you were very adamant about certain things in TNA most times. The reason I get upset is I gotta deal with people who apparently are in the mindset that it's apparently wrong to like TNA, and you either have to be some youtube shooter or extreme diehard to enjoy it. I gotta hear a bunch of people almost every week giving eulogies and excuses for Spike to move the show or cancel it every time the ratings drops down a fraction of a point. I know it damn sure isn't perfect. I can name a couple of things I don't enjoy about TNA, but I do enjoy it with all it's flaws. The problem with me is having to deal with people who get so passionate in their hate that you can't go anywhere without hearing about some new bad thing TNA supposedly did. At least they can't belittle the team work of AJ and Christian. We still got that on tna. ;D
|
|