|
|
Post by mysterydriver on May 9, 2007 18:01:08 GMT -5
The forty-seventh week of ECW Wrestling (10-11:06p) averaged a 1.47 HH rating, with a 1.23 in M18-49, a 1.23 in M18-34 and an average audience of 1.8 million viewers.
Compared to its prior forty-six weeks, ECW Wrestling was down -18% in HH, -23% in M18-49, -26% in M18-34 and -18% in average audience.
After forty-seven weeks, ECW Wrestling is averaging a 1.78 HH rating, with a 1.58 in M18-49, a 1.65 in M18-34 and an average audience of 2.1 million viewers.
Gerweck.net
First...didn't someone say Tuesday was the 49th show?
Second...why is this so overly complicated. Did ECW only get a 1.47 or am I misreading this.
...Maybe I should have waited on another site to report this.
Oh well, begin the discussion!...or not!
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on May 9, 2007 18:01:36 GMT -5
...WHAT'S WITH ALL THE MATH  |
|
|
|
Post by Stu on May 9, 2007 18:09:11 GMT -5
There's a reason I'm a journalist and not a mathematician, dammit.
|
|
|
|
Post by 01010010 01101001 01100011 on May 9, 2007 18:13:52 GMT -5
ECW as a whole got a 1.47 rating (men and women of all ages). This is down 18% on average.
In the men 18-49 (which is one of the money demographics for wrestling) it got a 1.23 which is a 26% drop on average.
In men 18-39 (the biggest demographic for wrestling, the one a majority of ad revenue is sold on) it got a 1.23 which is down 18% on average.
I think.
EDIT: The average ratings are 1.78 overall, 1.58 in men 18-49 and 1.65 in men 18-39.
|
|
|
|
Post by floundertime on May 9, 2007 18:16:07 GMT -5
The forty-seventh week of ECW Wrestling (10-11:06p) averaged a 1.47 HH rating, with a 1.23 in M18-49, a 1.23 in M18-34 and an average audience of 1.8 million viewers. Compared to its prior forty-six weeks, ECW Wrestling was down -18% in HH, -23% in M18-49, -26% in M18-34 and -18% in average audience. After forty-seven weeks, ECW Wrestling is averaging a 1.78 HH rating, with a 1.58 in M18-49, a 1.65 in M18-34 and an average audience of 2.1 million viewers. Gerweck.net First...didn't someone say Tuesday was the 49th show? Second...why is this so overly complicated. Did ECW only get a 1.47 or am I misreading this. ...Maybe I should have waited on another site to report this. Oh well, begin the discussion!...or not! I'll do my best trying to explain it......the is it week 48 or 49, I can't explain that. Let's look at the numbers...Overall ratings for the show 1.47 means that 1.47% of households that were watching tv that night, we watching ECW. 1.23% of men 18-49 and 1.23% of men 18-34 were watching the show. Now the 1.8 million viewers means that is the total people that watched it. The total number people watching tv that night was 122 million, so 1.47% of those people (the ecw rating) was 1.8 million people. Hope this clears things up. If not, I'm sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by 01010010 01101001 01100011 on May 9, 2007 18:18:23 GMT -5
The show debuted June 13 so this would have been the 47 show.
|
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on May 9, 2007 20:03:13 GMT -5
I like wrestling
|
|
salTy
El Dandy
Posts: 8,425
|
Post by salTy on May 9, 2007 20:05:24 GMT -5
LOL @ ECW........?
|
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on May 9, 2007 20:08:18 GMT -5
The HH rating is named after Hunter's illegitimate son with Nicole Bass, Double H.
|
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on May 9, 2007 20:28:55 GMT -5
I assume that is a complicated way to say Vince as ECW champ doesn't equal ratings.
LOL@Vince and his stupid do-rag!
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on May 9, 2007 20:31:54 GMT -5
I assume that is a complicated way to say Vince as ECW champ doesn't equal ratings. LOL@Vince and his stupid do-rag! Well, we can laugh at that anyway, that and his belief that being bald is the worst thing ever. LOL @ Vince in general, if you will. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyexile on May 9, 2007 20:37:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by John Oates' Moustache on May 9, 2007 21:03:28 GMT -5
How do they know if men 18-39 and not 9 year olds are watching this? These numbers are meaningless.
|
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on May 9, 2007 21:15:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on May 9, 2007 22:17:09 GMT -5
I wish it was possible for it to get a zero rating, just to scare the shit out of vince-he needs the shit scared out of him
|
|
JMA
Hank Scorpio
Down With Capitalism!
Posts: 6,880
|
Post by JMA on May 9, 2007 23:01:24 GMT -5
As much as I like Gerweck.net, they always overcomplicate TV ratings. The Observer does a better job, just listing the rounded number.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on May 9, 2007 23:04:13 GMT -5
So it got a 1.47? Or what did it get?
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on May 9, 2007 23:15:59 GMT -5
So it got a 1.47? Or what did it get? I DON'T KNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW!! ... Wow...would you believe that this was the first time I ever did that? ... Anyway, really. I don't know. Not at all. |
|
Ben Matlock
AC Slater
Ben Matlock: Attorney At Law
Posts: 154
|
Post by Ben Matlock on May 9, 2007 23:16:33 GMT -5
seems much easier to just say "the 5/8/07 edition of ecw received a 1.5 rating"
anything else is a wasted effort, but to each his own
|
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on May 9, 2007 23:18:37 GMT -5
seems much easier to just say "the 5/8/07 edition of ecw received a 1.5 rating" anything else is a wasted effort, but to each his own I'm sad I thought Vince w/du-rag and ECW Title would=ratings. Guess not. |
|
