|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on May 2, 2007 10:50:12 GMT -5
If that's the case, the talked-about switch of Shawn Michaels to Smackdown would become even more likely, or else Randy Orton may jump instead or also.
-pwtorch.com
HBK on Smackdown sounds cool and Orton would be a good addition but I'd perfer Edge going to Smackdown much more than either of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on May 2, 2007 10:52:21 GMT -5
Edge! I agree with Edge!
Although, Orton could jump over to Smackdown rather easily.
I mean...Booker still owes him a favor. Booker, also, never got his one-on-one title rematch.
Bada-Bing. Orton cashes his favor in to get Taker one-on-one. New Champ.
...
|
|
Kae
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 3,610
|
Post by Kae on May 2, 2007 10:58:45 GMT -5
Ugh. Without Shawn, RAW will lose 1/4 of their main-eventers. They really need talent on RAW more than they do on Smackdown.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on May 2, 2007 11:06:04 GMT -5
Ugh. Without Shawn, RAW will lose 1/4 of their main-eventers. They really need talent on RAW more than they do on Smackdown. What about smackdown? With Taker gone the only main eventer they have is Batista. |
|
rra
King Koopa
Posts: 10,145
|
Post by rra on May 2, 2007 11:12:35 GMT -5
I think its Orton that gets shipped off to SMACKDOWN! Besides, it might actually do good for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by robferatu on May 2, 2007 11:25:06 GMT -5
I think it should be Edge. I've always thought of Shawn Michaels as Raw's version of The Undertaker, you know. Plus Smackdown needs a heel more than a face.
|
|
