|
|
Post by heffer111 on Feb 26, 2007 4:30:58 GMT -5
On HBK's wikipedia
"At No Way Out, Michaels and Cena, defeated Batista and The Undertaker.Beacause three wekks ago Undertaker chokeslammed Batista so Batista said paybacks a bitch and that was true as they were about to win Batista spinebusted undertaker in the middle og the ring"
|
|
|
|
Post by jcdenton on Feb 26, 2007 4:33:12 GMT -5
looks like a real winner has taken to editing wiki now..
|
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Feb 26, 2007 5:49:48 GMT -5
"eDitad by sALLy, aGe syx and tfhree quaterz"
|
|
Mista T
Unicron
THAT'S HARDCORE!!!1
Posts: 2,597
|
Post by Mista T on Feb 26, 2007 6:49:50 GMT -5
What a great description, a classic HBK moment. It's what dreams are made of.
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Feb 26, 2007 7:52:15 GMT -5
Wikipedia for Kids!
|
|
|
|
Post by careless on Feb 26, 2007 7:54:56 GMT -5
They need to start a rogue wikipedia type thing where you're supposed to lie and embelish. Over time, people would rebel and start printing the truth.
|
|
Ratings
Dennis Stamp
Has a box of scraps
"YAY!"
Posts: 4,236
|
Post by Ratings on Feb 26, 2007 8:11:14 GMT -5
On HBK's wikipedia "At No Way Out, Michaels and Cena, defeated Batista and The Undertaker.Beacause three wekks ago Undertaker chokeslammed Batista so Batista said paybacks a b*tch and that was true as they were about to win Batista spinebusted undertaker in the middle og the ring" I think this is one of the reasons why my college looks down at wikipedia references in bibliographies. |
|
clifford
King Koopa
Shingo Takagi stan
Posts: 10,683
|
Post by clifford on Feb 26, 2007 8:52:03 GMT -5
yeah mine tells me we can't use it at all and i'm glad they do.
|
|
|
|
Post by DSR on Feb 26, 2007 9:11:29 GMT -5
On HBK's wikipedia "At No Way Out, Michaels and Cena, defeated Batista and The Undertaker.Beacause three wekks ago Undertaker chokeslammed Batista so Batista said paybacks a b*tch and that was true as they were about to win Batista spinebusted undertaker in the middle og the ring" I think this is one of the reasons why my college looks down at wikipedia references in bibliographies. To be fair, I've been on Wikipedia for a ton of things, and the only times I've ever encountered people adding bulls*** to a page was on the pages about wrestlers or wrestling. I still don't consider Wikipedia all that reliable, but that's what I've found. |
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Feb 26, 2007 9:24:15 GMT -5
I think Wikipedia is needlessly cluttered with irrelevant information when it comes to wrestling, simply because everyone wants to be an author. Like the example in this thread. It was for Shawn Michaels' wiki entry right? Why did this No Way Out match even need to be mentioned on it? Shawn has had a long and illustrious career -- was "No Way Out 2007" really anything remotely significant in the grand scheme of things? No! The Batista-Undertaker thing had nothing to even do with HBK. I don't think that every single thing a wrestler does needs to be documented.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Feb 26, 2007 9:29:09 GMT -5
They need to start a rogue wikipedia type thing where you're supposed to lie and embelish. Over time, people would rebel and start printing the truth. |
|
oltrelamorte
Don Corleone
Comin' for you, Big Boss Man!
Posts: 1,375
|
Post by oltrelamorte on Feb 26, 2007 11:32:05 GMT -5
Ahahahaha!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkshi Tanahashi on Feb 26, 2007 11:49:51 GMT -5
I think this is one of the reasons why my college looks down at wikipedia references in bibliographies. To be fair, I've been on Wikipedia for a ton of things, and the only times I've ever encountered people adding bulls*** to a page was on the pages about wrestlers or wrestling. I still don't consider Wikipedia all that reliable, but that's what I've found. I find that Wikipedia can lead you to good sources but isn't a good source to use of term papers. |
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Feb 26, 2007 11:49:53 GMT -5
They need to start a rogue wikipedia type thing where you're supposed to lie and embelish. Over time, people would rebel and start printing the truth. There are several: Uncyclopedia and EncyclopediaDramatica are the more amusing, but I won't link due to strong content. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtydickraines on Feb 26, 2007 12:19:05 GMT -5
I've had a few teachers who refuse to accept any paper that lists Wikipedia as a source.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hensley on Feb 26, 2007 12:21:04 GMT -5
Good ol' Wikipedia
|
|
