|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 6, 2007 16:45:47 GMT -5
I believe it should come back. Look at first having two world title belts was not a problem. However when they started teaming up with each other it just seems wrong. Also coupled with the fact that ECW is back so they have a world title as well but it seems to have the credibity of the European title. So my question is should there be a unification match to declare the Undisputed World Champion? Or just leave it as it is right now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2007 16:46:38 GMT -5
Only if it means Jericho can beat Cena/Batista in one night ala Vengeance (Rock/Austin)
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Feb 6, 2007 16:49:29 GMT -5
If it's worn as a Triple Crown, HELL YES.
Seriously a dude wrapped in Gold is aWesome
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Feb 6, 2007 16:59:25 GMT -5
I can smell it:
Undertaker vs. Shawn Michaels, for a WWE (I mean HUGE emphasis on WWE part, ECW just be by itself) Undisputed Unification match. Money! And even better, make it inside that bigger Hell in a Cell too, put in some nostalgia factor.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Feb 6, 2007 17:02:21 GMT -5
Yeah, if it were represented by the three belts, I'd be for it. Otherwise it would just be too weird having the "ECW" roster fighting for a belt that isn't the ECW World Title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyberwoo on Feb 6, 2007 17:06:10 GMT -5
Only if it means Jericho can beat Cena/Batista in one night ala Vengeance (Rock/Austin) Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 6, 2007 17:07:58 GMT -5
Yeah, if it were represented by the three belts, I'd be for it. Otherwise it would just be too weird having the "ECW" roster fighting for a belt that isn't the ECW World Title. My thought is they could take an aspect of all three belts and make it into one belt. SO it would make some sort of sense. |
|
