Better WM main events?

[erik316wttn]

Yes, I know neither match is ideal in the eyes of the IWC. However, if you were the booker and had to choose, which would it be?

I would have to go with Cena/Taker and HBK/Batista. As I've stated, workrate aside, Cena can be really good when he wants to be. Undertaker works well with smaller guys (Mick Foley being an exception). Batista would need to be carried and Undertaker couldn't do it. Shawn Michaels could.

Even though I think Cena/HBK would be the best possible match out of those I've listed, especially if they keep the tag belts all the way until WM, Taker/Batista would be as bad as Cena/HBK is good.

[RandomHero]

Personally I wish they'd do HBK/Undertaker and Cena/Batista. Out of the options though, I GUESS I'd go with Cena/Undertaker, though I really see no reason for HBK to fight Batista.

[heffer111]

hbk/batista makes no sense at all, i just dont see why hbk would deserve that title shot

[Deleted]

I'd prefer what we're originally led to believe.

Cena/HBK and Batista/Taker.

[Big Daddy Bad Booking]

I remember HBK/Bats done once at Armageddon a few years ago, and it sucked big time, so that is a no-no, and option #1 automatically won my vote.

However, Cena and UT tore down houses in 2003.

[Spankymac is sick of the swiss]

HBK/Batista and Cena/Taker, because HBK could probably drag a much better match out of Batista than 'Taker could, and a Cena/Taker brawl will probably be awesome.

[Monty Black]

At this point any match not involving Batista is good, as neither HBK or Undertaker can pull an interesting match out of Big Dave in his current role. Undertaker vs Batista would be more enjoyable than HBK vs Batista, but Cena vs Taker would be the most unpredictable WM main event in a long time.

[oltrelamorte]

Cena/HBK and Undertaker/Batista

[ACG2x]

What about C-

Cena/HBK

and

Undertaker/Kennedy

I'm really meh at the prospect of dolting doofus Dave plod his way around a Mania' world title match, forgetting what body parts to sell and when.

[rrm15]

randomhero said:

Personally I wish they'd do HBK/Undertaker and Cena/Batista. Out of the options though, I GUESS I'd go with Cena/Undertaker, though I really see no reason for HBK to fight Batista.

That would indeed be awesome.

[Austin's Middle Finger]

Cena/HBK and Bats/Taker just seem more natural. Mania is one night when workrate takes a back seat. Mania's all about the hype, novelty and spectacle.

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

randomhero said:

Personally I wish they'd do HBK/Undertaker and Cena/Batista. Out of the options though, I GUESS I'd go with Cena/Undertaker, though I really see no reason for HBK to fight Batista.

Cena-Batista seems to be the fued they're saving up for a rainy day.

[Deleted]

acg2x said:

What about C-

Cena/HBK

and

Undertaker/Kennedy

I'm really meh at the prospect of dolting doofus Dave plod his way around a Mania' world title match, forgetting what body parts to sell and when.

I'd like to see a Taker/Batista match (first time I've actually looked forward to a Batista match) simply because the crowd would be really hot and make the match a lot better than it actually would be.

It'd be relatively unpredictable too. Taker would PROBABLY win, but it's not certain.

[erik316wttn]

bootytime said:

acg2x said:

What about C-

Cena/HBK

and

Undertaker/Kennedy

I'm really meh at the prospect of dolting doofus Dave plod his way around a Mania' world title match, forgetting what body parts to sell and when.

I'd like to see a Taker/Batista match (first time I've actually looked forward to a Batista match) simply because the crowd would be really hot and make the match a lot better than it actually would be.

It'd be relatively unpredictable too. Taker would PROBABLY win, but it's not certain.

WWE knows they have Taker's streak to use to put someone over. Taker is a company guy and he'll job at WM if asked. They seem to want to end it from everything I've heard, so I'd rather Cena end Undertaker's streak rather than Batista even though neither need the rub.