Which MitB standoff would you rather see?

[Aaron E. Dangerously]

We're obv. gonna see one tag team go face to face for that briefcase. Who will it be?

[rrm15]

Matt/Jeff would be pretty cool.

[Ace Diamond]

Edge/Orton is bound to happen, and Jeff/Matt would be a nice surprise, and probably ultimately what costs them their respective victories in the match.

[mo]

Edge & Orton

[Hellsing920]

I second Finlay/Kennedy

[Deleted]

I don't mark for any match where Matt Hardy is involved.

He's about as exciting as unsliced bread.

[Hellsing920]

bootytime said:

I don't mark for any match where Matt Hardy is involved.

He's about as exciting as unsliced bread.

Agreed. Same goes for Jeff. That burnt out wasteoid is just boring (at least that's my opinion).

And, as for Edge and Orton, I'm sick of both of them. I've never liked Orton, and Edge's precious undefeated streak can shove it. I never cared about 'Taker's streak, why would I give half a rat's ass about Edge's?

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

hellsing920 said:

bootytime said:

I don't mark for any match where Matt Hardy is involved.

He's about as exciting as unsliced bread.

Agreed. Same goes for Jeff. That burnt out wasteoid is just boring (at least that's my opinion).

And, as for Edge and Orton, I'm sick of both of them. I've never liked Orton, and Edge's precious undefeated streak can shove it. I never cared about 'Taker's streak, why would I give half a rat's ass about Edge's?

When Cena gets hate it's all professional, workrate and shit. But somehow the Hardys get such unnecessary hate...burnt out wastoid?

[Hellsing920]

dmargul said:

hellsing920 said:

Agreed. Same goes for Jeff. That burnt out wasteoid is just boring (at least that's my opinion).

And, as for Edge and Orton, I'm sick of both of them. I've never liked Orton, and Edge's precious undefeated streak can shove it. I never cared about 'Taker's streak, why would I give half a rat's ass about Edge's?

When Cena gets hate it's all professional, workrate and crap. But somehow the Hardys get such unnecessary hate...burnt out wastoid?

Look, we all know about Jeff's "personal demons" and they affected his workrate. His matches started to go downhill because of his drug use. He has yet to impress me since he supposedly cleaned himself up. And, he still seems burnt out from all the weed and crap he was using.

Thus, the reason why I call him a burnt out wasteoid. Sorry if it wasn't as simple as "Cena's workrate sucks monkey tit" (and, mind you, it does), but that's just how I feel about Jeff Hardy.

[Ace Diamond]

dmargul said:

hellsing920 said:

Agreed. Same goes for Jeff. That burnt out wasteoid is just boring (at least that's my opinion).

And, as for Edge and Orton, I'm sick of both of them. I've never liked Orton, and Edge's precious undefeated streak can shove it. I never cared about 'Taker's streak, why would I give half a rat's ass about Edge's?

When Cena gets hate it's all professional, workrate and crap. But somehow the Hardys get such unnecessary hate...burnt out wastoid?

Yeah somebody want to explain this hate to me with like...facts instead of ad-hominem insults?

[mo]

Some people just don't like them, who cares, I don't respond or get offended by every Undertaker hate post (and there's plenty of em)

Of course I'm one of those Hardy haters too so I probably shouldn't be talking

[Ace Diamond]

motakerfan said:

Some people just don't like them, who cares, I don't respond or get offended by every Undertaker hate post (and there's plenty of em)

Of course I'm one of those Hardy haters too so I probably shouldn't be talking

True, true, and true.

[Hellsing920]

Well, I did explain my reason for not liking Jeff. But, to defend my hate for Matt.

Well, I just don't like him. It's that simple. The guy can work, there's no argument. But, he's just boring to me. Watching Matt Hardy to me is like watching linoleum curl. I'd rather watch four hours worth of Al Snow than sit through one Matt Hardy match (dammit, Mick Foley now has me ragging on Al Snow).

I understand that it's not a good reason, but it is my reason. He's just boring.

[mo]

aodpilot said:

motakerfan said:

Some people just don't like them, who cares, I don't respond or get offended by every Undertaker hate post (and there's plenty of em)

Of course I'm one of those Hardy haters too so I probably shouldn't be talking

True, true, and true.

I'll give them credit when I can, I won't deny they can be entertaining at times (well Jeff at least), but I haven't liked them since The Attitude era, for me it's just like I really couldn't get into them

[Hellsing920]

motakerfan said:

aodpilot said:

True, true, and true.

I'll give them credit when I can, I won't deny they can be entertaining at times (well Jeff at least), but I haven't liked them since The Attitude era, for me it's just like I really couldn't get into them

I second that. What's so wrong with just saying "I don't like them"?

I understand that when it's Cena, Batista, 'Taker, or anyone else, they get dissected and their workrate, or their professionalism comes into play. But, the Hardyz have the workrate (well, Matt does), but they just don't do it for me. Just because we are all smarks doesn't mean we need to have a specific reason for hating someone.

[robferatu]

I voted Edge and Orton, since they are the bigger stars.

I would love to see an Edge and CM Punk stand off though.

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

hellsing920 said:

motakerfan said:

I'll give them credit when I can, I won't deny they can be entertaining at times (well Jeff at least), but I haven't liked them since The Attitude era, for me it's just like I really couldn't get into them

I second that. What's so wrong with just saying "I don't like them"?

I understand that when it's Cena, Batista, 'Taker, or anyone else, they get dissected and their workrate, or their professionalism comes into play. But, the Hardyz have the workrate (well, Matt does), but they just don't do it for me. Just because we are all smarks doesn't mean we need to have a specific reason for hating someone.

Well, barring well-known outrageous flaws (racism, for example), it would be really difficult to know you don't like someone until you meet them. My rule of thumb is to admire the sacrifice that ALL wrestlers make for our entertainment, and while some do their job better than others, I'm in no position to dislike the person.

[Garee]

Matt and Jeff for sure

[Ace Diamond]

hellsing920 said:

motakerfan said:

I'll give them credit when I can, I won't deny they can be entertaining at times (well Jeff at least), but I haven't liked them since The Attitude era, for me it's just like I really couldn't get into them

I second that. What's so wrong with just saying "I don't like them"?

Well that's true, I'm just saying a lot of people on this board that say "I don't like them" usually use the two popular ad-hominem reasons (drugs, reaching out to the fans when he got cheated on) as the reasons for not liking him/them which i always find to be a bit petty. But yes, there's nothing wrong with disliking someone or not being able to enjoy their work on a level that others do. Different Strokes and all.

...sorry i'll get off my soapbox now.

[Dr. T is an alien]

I picked Edge and Orton, but not because I want either to win. If they have a stand-off, it virtually assures that neither will win it, so I'd rather have that.