Why CM Punk should have won at VENGEANCE

[rra]

Johnny Nitro has so much potential, but giving him the belt this soon is a mistake. Punk jobbing to a guy who was working HEAT/RAW gutters for a few months makes Punk look bad, and it makes Nitro seem like his IC reign awhile back...

Artificial.

No, CM Punk should have beaten him for the belt at VENGEANCE, but Johnny Nitro gives it his surprisingly all. Its a start for him.

At ECW TV on tuesday (no mention ever made about the Beniot Situation) Tommy Dreamer comes out with his singapore Cane. He whines and wants a ECW belt shot.

Punk begs to differ and three other men demand their own shot at the belt: Burke, Cor Von, and Nitro.

But at the next PPV, Dreamer fights Punk for the ECW belt in an "Old School" ECW match: Anything goes.

Punk wins, and makes his shakey but decent champ credibility stronger this side of Foley jobbing to Triple H.

Meanwhile, Nitro/Burke/Cor Von/Boogeyman/Thorn fight which will have Nitro be a serious title-contender, Cor Von and Burke escalating in their own petty feud, and Thorn/Boogeyman have a stinker of a Halloween-themed PPV match under 5 minutes.

ITS NOT THAT HARD FOLKS.

[KEJB]

ummmm what?

[Cypress]

come on man they were planning on giving the belt to Benoit, thats the only reason Nitro got the belt

[Corporate H]

rra said:

But at the next PPV, Dreamer fights Punk for the ECW belt in an "Old School" ECW match: Anything goes.

Punk wins, and makes his shakey but decent champ credibility stronger this side of Foley jobbing to Triple H.

But wouldn't...that...make him a...heel? And it is that hard actually.