|
|
Post by barryhorowitz4ever on Oct 30, 2007 21:51:45 GMT -5
and if the endings of those matches weren't scripted, that record would actually mean something.
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Oct 30, 2007 21:54:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Lionheart on Oct 30, 2007 21:56:05 GMT -5
Aw, geez.
I'd say it means something that WWE thinks enough of the guy to script him to win 15 straight times at their biggest event.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2007 21:58:23 GMT -5
Aw, geez. I'd say it means something that WWE thinks enough of the guy to script him to win 15 straight times at their biggest event. agreed. being a main eventer from the moment you began your WWE career to the moment it is ended over a decade and a half later, and being undefeated at WM for that entire time, mean a hell of a lot |
|
|
|
Post by Aaron E. Dangerously on Oct 30, 2007 21:58:34 GMT -5
I'd say it means something that WWE thinks enough of the guy to script him to win 15 straight times at their biggest event. |
|
Cranjis McBasketball
Crow T. Robot
Knew what the hell that thing was supposed to be
Peace Love and Nothing But
Posts: 41,930
|
Post by Cranjis McBasketball on Oct 31, 2007 4:27:47 GMT -5
and if the endings of those matches weren't scripted, that record would actually mean something. Whoa, whoa, whoa......those matches were scipted? Giant Gonzolaes didn't really put him down with formaldhyde? Things changes everything....... |
|
|
|
Post by The Missing Manic on Oct 31, 2007 7:25:16 GMT -5
Yeah it shows how much the company respect the man have any other wwe stars ever had a recoed like that??
|
|
|
|
Post by I Graduated Warrior University on Oct 31, 2007 7:29:54 GMT -5
Personally, the streak and all the hyping of it irritates me. I will always say that he should have lost to Orton at WM21 and not because I'm an Orton mark, just because it makes sense. Look at it this way: Besides the fact that it's a stat in a "fake" sport that actually means something to 'Taker. As I posted in the (w)Rest of Wrestling section, how can your gimmick be that of a "Legend Killer" if you can't go over REAL legends (a waaaaaaaaaay past his prime, full timer Ric Flair doesn't count)
|
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Oct 31, 2007 7:47:21 GMT -5
You can always tell who has zero grip on reality when around WrestleMania they start saying "I don't care what happens, but Undertaker better win or I'm not watching WWE anymore!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Oct 31, 2007 8:03:59 GMT -5
Personally, the streak and all the hyping of it irritates me. I will always say that he should have lost to Orton at WM21 and not because I'm an Orton mark, just because it makes sense. Look at it this way: Besides the fact that it's a stat in a "fake" sport that actually means something to 'Taker. As I posted in the (w)Rest of Wrestling section, how can your gimmick be that of a "Legend Killer" if you can't go over REAL legends (a waaaaaaaaaay past his prime, full timer Ric Flair doesn't count) Well, Randy did seperate his rotator cuff before 'Mania of that year, so that's why Taker went over there. |
|
|
|
Post by I Graduated Warrior University on Oct 31, 2007 8:06:07 GMT -5
Personally, the streak and all the hyping of it irritates me. I will always say that he should have lost to Orton at WM21 and not because I'm an Orton mark, just because it makes sense. Look at it this way: Besides the fact that it's a stat in a "fake" sport that actually means something to 'Taker. As I posted in the (w)Rest of Wrestling section, how can your gimmick be that of a "Legend Killer" if you can't go over REAL legends (a waaaaaaaaaay past his prime, full timer Ric Flair doesn't count) Well, Randy did seperate his rotator cuff before 'Mania of that year, so that's why Taker went over there. Oh, OK I didn't know that, and I couldn't tell seeing as the match was awesome. So am I to assume that Orton would have gone over if he wasn't injured? |
|
|
|
Post by Maxnificent on Oct 31, 2007 13:29:03 GMT -5
I can't recall...when was it that they started to point out Taker was undefeated at WM?
|
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Oct 31, 2007 13:36:20 GMT -5
You can always tell who has zero grip on reality when around WrestleMania they start saying "I don't care what happens, but Undertaker better win or I'm not watching WWE anymore!" I'll keep watching, but I still don't think he should lose. If he does loses at Wrestlemania I'll probably just be like, "Damn. Bit of a shame...ok, bring on the next match!" |
|
|
|
Post by seano on Oct 31, 2007 15:33:59 GMT -5
I'd love it if there was an event he was 0-whatever at. But I doubt that exists, he's probably won at least once at every monthly/seasonal PPV that's been held since 1990.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Oct 31, 2007 15:49:31 GMT -5
And to think, if only Jimmy Snuka had gone over Undertaker at Wrestlemania VII, we wouldn't even be in this mess right now.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Oct 31, 2007 16:00:51 GMT -5
Aw, geez. I'd say it means something that WWE thinks enough of the guy to script him to win 15 straight times at their biggest event. agreed. being a main eventer from the moment you began your WWE career to the moment it is ended over a decade and a half later, and being undefeated at WM for that entire time, mean a hell of a lot agreeded |
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Nov 1, 2007 1:10:28 GMT -5
and if the endings of those matches weren't scripted, that record would actually mean something. Wrestling is scripted???  |
|
Cheeba
Don Corleone
Matt Striker for VP
Posts: 1,587
|
Post by Cheeba on Nov 1, 2007 11:25:06 GMT -5
I still think that Randy Orton should have ended the streak a few years back. But that matched owned, regardless.
|
|
|
|
Post by krazysane on Nov 1, 2007 12:28:53 GMT -5
And to think, if only Jimmy Snuka had gone over Undertaker at Wrestlemania VII, we wouldn't even be in this mess right now. I agree! |
|
|
|
Post by bshadye413 on Nov 1, 2007 12:32:05 GMT -5
I think if Orton hadn't been injured he may have won his match against Taker at WM21. But since he was injured it wouldnt have made sense, since he wouldnt have been around to capitalize on it.
I have no real reason for believing this, its just that that match was the only time I ever really thought Taker would lose at Mania. Now i'm fairly certain that he won't ever lose his streak
|
|
