|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Oct 12, 2007 18:28:12 GMT -5
Gerweck.net
I called it in the thread last night!
Senshi shouted "What's up!" at the crowd and they responded. Therefore:
Senshi Sing-a-long: 1.05
That...that Youtube guy is psychic!
|
|
erisi236
Fry's dog Seymour
... enjoys the rich, smooth taste of Camels.
Not good! Not good! Not good!
Posts: 21,904
|
Post by erisi236 on Oct 12, 2007 18:31:25 GMT -5
GroundHog Day 2: TNA Impact Ratings.
|
|
Bret Hart Rules
Trap-Jaw
This is your brain. This is your brain on the street. Any questions?
Posts: 356
|
Post by Bret Hart Rules on Oct 12, 2007 18:46:44 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aaron E. Dangerously on Oct 12, 2007 18:48:37 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part. It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. |
|
biafra
El Dandy
Biafra Who?
Posts: 7,617
|
Post by biafra on Oct 12, 2007 18:51:28 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part. It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. But they aren't awful compared to most other cable shows. put against even the WWE's low ratings of course they are lacking..but put them against most shows on cable they are actually pretty good. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Oct 12, 2007 18:52:42 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part. It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. Why is it awful? Cause they're not on level with the other wrestling shows? |
|
comahan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,899 
|
Post by comahan on Oct 12, 2007 18:53:18 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part. It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. Which they arent. |
|
erisi236
Fry's dog Seymour
... enjoys the rich, smooth taste of Camels.
Not good! Not good! Not good!
Posts: 21,904
|
Post by erisi236 on Oct 12, 2007 19:07:28 GMT -5
Interesting note: The average quarterly ratings for Spike TV in general is 1.1, so TNA fits right in.  USA, the #1 cable network had an average quarterly rating of 2.2. P.S. and an Uninteresting note, Tila Tequilas MTV show pulled in 1.8 million viewers, and that make me a sad panda.  |
|
|
|
Post by GaTechGrad on Oct 12, 2007 19:11:18 GMT -5
Well, on the positive side, they are consistent with their ratings for the most part. It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. How is 1.1 awful? |
|
Bret Hart Rules
Trap-Jaw
This is your brain. This is your brain on the street. Any questions?
Posts: 356
|
Post by Bret Hart Rules on Oct 12, 2007 19:18:03 GMT -5
If anything a 1.1 average over 2 hours is a good number because it means that you kept your audience for twice as long rather than losing a bunch of them halfway. So it's pretty positive all around
|
|
Rube
Hank Scorpio
Sammich Bogart
It's always the same and it's always different.
Posts: 5,619
|
Post by Rube on Oct 12, 2007 19:24:57 GMT -5
It ain't a positive thing if the ratings are consistently awful. How is 1.1 awful? It isn't. 1.4 Mill is about what The Daily Show gets I think. |
|
|
|
Post by CrazySting on Oct 12, 2007 19:50:53 GMT -5
Battlestar galactica was getting 1.1s at the end of season 3 and it got renewed . And that costs way more than impact ever will ($3 million per episode).
TNA gets good ratings, AND it's cheap programming. Which is probably why spike are behind it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cry Me a Wiggle on Oct 12, 2007 21:08:06 GMT -5
In a time when the WWE is experiencing a downward slide in ratings across the board, solidly staying in the 1.0 range is a good thing.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Oct 12, 2007 21:40:43 GMT -5
I agree w/the above. consistant ratings is better than a sliding rating. Also I know it may be a moot point but DVR's don't give ratings (I don't think I might be wrong) Thurday is a big night for TV. Grey's Anatomy, Ugly Betty, ER these are ratings juggernaughts (SP) I have to DVR Impact on Sat due to Grey's Anatomy and ER and I'm a huge TNA mark
|
|
comahan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,899
|
Post by comahan on Oct 12, 2007 21:44:57 GMT -5
I agree w/the above. consistant ratings is better than a sliding rating. Also I know it may be a moot point but DVR's don't give ratings (I don't think I might be wrong) Thurday is a big night for TV. Grey's Anatomy, Ugly Betty, ER these are ratings juggernaughts (SP) I have to DVR Impact on Sat due to Grey's Anatomy and ER and I'm a huge TNA mark The Office and My name is Earl also, I believe. WWE has Heroes and MNF tho. So, yea. |
|
Rube
Hank Scorpio
Sammich Bogart
It's always the same and it's always different.
Posts: 5,619
|
Post by Rube on Oct 12, 2007 21:46:40 GMT -5
I agree w/the above. consistant ratings is better than a sliding rating. Also I know it may be a moot point but DVR's don't give ratings (I don't think I might be wrong) Thurday is a big night for TV. Grey's Anatomy, Ugly Betty, ER these are ratings juggernaughts (SP) I have to DVR Impact on Sat due to Grey's Anatomy and ER and I'm a huge TNA mark The Office and My name is Earl also, I believe. WWE has Heroes and MNF tho. So, yea. RAW's raiting has dropped and Impact's has stayed the same. I'm willing to bet Spike is ecstatic with their numbers. |
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Oct 12, 2007 21:50:56 GMT -5
In truth, steady ratings are better than none.
In reality, people keep expecting TNA to somehow draw twice of Spike's average viewing audience.
now let's just wait for the quarter hour reports and see how many viewers they got when.
|
|
pacino
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,504
|
Post by pacino on Oct 13, 2007 13:27:08 GMT -5
people complaining about the rating don't understand cable ratings
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Oct 13, 2007 20:48:43 GMT -5
I agree w/the above. consistant ratings is better than a sliding rating. Also I know it may be a moot point but DVR's don't give ratings (I don't think I might be wrong) Thurday is a big night for TV. Grey's Anatomy, Ugly Betty, ER these are ratings juggernaughts (SP) I have to DVR Impact on Sat due to Grey's Anatomy and ER and I'm a huge TNA mark I believe DVR's/DVR'ed material do count toward the ratings as long as it is watched by 5pm the following day. That is why the early overnight ratings usually grow by the time the official ratings come out. |
|
|
|
Post by machinegun on Oct 13, 2007 20:49:59 GMT -5
This is what happens when Angle doesn't have all 3 belts
|
|
