|
|
Post by voiceboxisback on Oct 31, 2007 13:58:48 GMT -5
Does anyone have this clip, it was during a Nash promo on the May 9th, 2000 episode of WCW Thunder. I completely forgot about this and have been dying to see this again.
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Oct 31, 2007 14:53:35 GMT -5
That was hilarious I also remember them trying to slime Nash and missing, then he stepped into the same spot, then they missed again.
IT was a Lol. They should have done it the way kane did to stone cold.
I remember that the "new blood" would drain the energy out of everybody not in the New Blood. Like it hurt Ric Flair and Charles Robinson, but it made vince russo pumped up
|
|
bob
Backup Wench
The "other" Bob. FOC COURSE!
started the Madness Wars, Proudly the #1 Nana Hater on FAN
Posts: 80,905
|
Post by bob on Oct 31, 2007 15:04:42 GMT -5
I've never seen this
|
|
yourgoingdown
AC Slater
Get ready for a Wild Ride on the Outside!
Posts: 231
|
Post by yourgoingdown on Oct 31, 2007 16:41:49 GMT -5
Id love to see that clip again. I do remember the blood missing Nash twice and the crowd getting most of it lol. Man that New Blood thing didnt last to long did it.
|
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Oct 31, 2007 16:42:27 GMT -5
I have it on tape somewhere, damn I wish I labeled tapes.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Oct 31, 2007 16:48:26 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2007 18:57:17 GMT -5
Wow.......I mean you always hear how WCW sucked with stuff like that but to actually watch it.......How the hell was anyone watching by the end of it |
|
KEJB
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,302
|
Post by KEJB on Oct 31, 2007 21:21:08 GMT -5
3 Count. Jung Dragons. Mysterio. Kidman. Booker T and Scott Steiner in their primes, in the top spots. Thats how I stuck with WCW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cry Me a Wiggle on Oct 31, 2007 21:55:51 GMT -5
I'd still take WCW and their shoddy production over the WWE of today.
|
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Nov 1, 2007 16:42:52 GMT -5
I'd still take WCW and their shoddy production over the WWE of today. I don't know. I think a lot of us say that now and looking back on stuff like WCW 2000 or the WWF in 1995 doesn't seem that bad. However, if that was the time we were living in and that was all there was in mainstream wrestling I think we'd be begging for WWE 2007. However, WCW in 2001 is vastly underated. |
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Nov 1, 2007 16:44:28 GMT -5
I'd still take WCW and their shoddy production over the WWE of today. I don't know. I think a lot of us say that now and looking back on stuff like WCW 2000 or the WWF in 1995 doesn't seem that bad. However, if that was the time we were living in and that was all there was in mainstream wrestling I think we'd be begging for WWE 2007. However, WCW in 2001 is vastly underated. I dunno, even with the stuff going on in 2000 and even in 1995, I still would probably prefer seeing my favorites such as Booker.T, Goldberg, Sting over some of the guys in WWE right now to be honest. |
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Nov 1, 2007 16:52:24 GMT -5
I'd still take WCW and their shoddy production over the WWE of today. so you watch TNA then? |
|
Mr. Mediocre
Hank Scorpio
Bert Early?... sorry, that's a typo. Butt. Ugly.
Much better since I was last here.
Posts: 6,249
|
Post by Mr. Mediocre on Nov 1, 2007 17:05:31 GMT -5
I don't know. I think a lot of us say that now and looking back on stuff like WCW 2000 or the WWF in 1995 doesn't seem that bad. However, if that was the time we were living in and that was all there was in mainstream wrestling I think we'd be begging for WWE 2007. However, WCW in 2001 is vastly underated. I dunno, even with the stuff going on in 2000 and even in 1995, I still would probably prefer seeing my favorites such as Booker.T, Goldberg, Sting over some of the guys in WWE right now to be honest. My feeling is that WWE's undercard and pure depth make them the better choice. However, the main eventers in WCW in 2000 were far better than the main eventers of today's WWE, and that's saying a lot since I can't stand Jeff Jarrett. |
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Nov 1, 2007 17:07:57 GMT -5
I dunno, even with the stuff going on in 2000 and even in 1995, I still would probably prefer seeing my favorites such as Booker.T, Goldberg, Sting over some of the guys in WWE right now to be honest. My feeling is that WWE's undercard and pure depth make them the better choice. However, the main eventers in WCW in 2000 were far better than the main eventers of today's WWE, and that's saying a lot since I can't stand Jeff Jarrett. Maybe some may feel that way, but to me I could never find myself watching or caring for a Lance Cade or Kennedy. I didn't think Jarrett was as bad as people say either. And WWE to me at the time wasn't that bad in 95 also and I'd rather watch that then today's stuff any day. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiesfan on Nov 1, 2007 17:43:47 GMT -5
The first match is the biggest insult to human intelligence of all time. I can't believe it. On top of that: Slapass? Bite on that (pointing to his chunck)? THIS IS FRIDGIN RETARDED. No wonder buyrates and ratings went downhill with this crap. If TNA doesn't fire Russo in the next months then the same thing will happen to them, because he is almost rehashing some of this horrible stuff 1 to 1. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulk With A Mustache on Nov 1, 2007 17:53:40 GMT -5
About the Ric Flair/Vince Russo match, GOOD GOD!!!! That was a lot of blood!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by GaTechGrad on Nov 1, 2007 19:48:56 GMT -5
The blood falling from ceiling reminds me of "You Can't Do That on Television."
|
|
|
|
Post by Aceorton on Nov 1, 2007 22:50:38 GMT -5
3 Count. Jung Dragons. Mysterio. Kidman. Booker T and Scott Steiner in their primes, in the top spots. Thats how I stuck with WCW. To say Scott Steiner was in his prime in 2000-01 is sort of like saying Barry Windham was in his prime in 1996. But I understand what you're saying. |
|
|
|
Post by robferatu on Nov 1, 2007 23:14:19 GMT -5
The funny thing about WCW 2000 was a majority of the matches were great. You had great matches featuring Billy Kidman, Booker T, Lance Storm, Mike Awesome, Shane Douglas and Vampiro. It's just the storylines were so horrible that it turned you off to the product.
|
|
|
|
Post by davyd doesn't eat meat on Nov 2, 2007 0:27:11 GMT -5
WCW in 2000 was at least enetertaining in the sense that it was completely terrible... and I'll admit, I was a WCW fan til the very end.
|
|
