Zane
Team Rocket
GREATEST POWERBOMB EVER!
Posts: 959
|
Post by Zane on Nov 3, 2007 18:14:33 GMT -5
Personally after having the six sided ring shoved down my throat I like the four sided best. Don't get me wrong, a few cool things are better done with the six sides. I just think TNA should use a four sided ring for most of the time and only bust out the six sided ring when a cage match is to take place or at a major PPV.
|
|
Matt Rogers
King Koopa
member is currently offline <stalking Emma Watson>
Omae wa mo shindeiru.
Posts: 11,869
|
Post by Matt Rogers on Nov 3, 2007 18:15:23 GMT -5
Maybe they should bust out the six sided ring for stuff like Destination X, since I've always associated it with the X Division.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gopher Mod on Nov 3, 2007 18:16:29 GMT -5
Two sides is the correct answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on Nov 3, 2007 18:42:32 GMT -5
I have no real problem with the six sided ring, I just don't think it adds anything.
|
|
Zane
Team Rocket
GREATEST POWERBOMB EVER!
Posts: 959
|
Post by Zane on Nov 3, 2007 18:45:07 GMT -5
Two sides is the correct answer. That would be a interesting ring. |
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Nov 3, 2007 18:59:02 GMT -5
I have no real problem with the six sided ring, I just don't think it adds anything. Ya same here, it just makes matches look weird. |
|
|
|
Post by twiggy101 on Nov 3, 2007 19:19:19 GMT -5
I read somewhere that with the six sided ring the ropes are much tighter so that the wrestlers are able to balance on them easier to do some moves.
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Nov 3, 2007 19:19:53 GMT -5
the only reason it looks weird is because of TNA's camera crew they suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Nov 3, 2007 19:19:58 GMT -5
It's hip to be square
|
|
|
|
Post by CMPunkyBrewster on Nov 4, 2007 4:30:12 GMT -5
I read somewhere that with the six sided ring the ropes are much tighter so that the wrestlers are able to balance on them easier to do some moves. i've worked in one on one occassion, and yeah, the ropes are stiffer than f***. it also takes alot of adjusting just to get used to the damn thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Thread Pirate Roberts on Nov 4, 2007 4:33:34 GMT -5
I am old school give me 4 sides please.
As for the ropes being tighter I can see that as there is less space between posts which means less sag which = tighter ropes.
|
|
|
|
Post by texaswhopper on Nov 4, 2007 9:09:00 GMT -5
I guess I'll redo this movie quote to express my feelings...
Hitchhiker: 4's the key number here. Think about it. 4-score. 4 doors. 4, man, that's the number. 4 chipmunks twirlin' on a branch, eatin' lots of sunflowers on my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tale from the sea. It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby.
|
|
|
|
Post by Near Fantastica on Nov 4, 2007 9:11:39 GMT -5
I want to see a three sided ring. They'd have to bounce off the turnbuckles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aaron E. Dangerously on Nov 4, 2007 9:30:31 GMT -5
EIGHT SIDES!
Gimmie some sweet Lucha Libre acciones!
|
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Nov 4, 2007 11:20:17 GMT -5
Rings have FOUR sides.
If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
IMO the 6-sided ring looks stupid and confusing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Pacman Khan (akkilla) on Nov 4, 2007 18:34:54 GMT -5
what about a ring that is so big it has members of the crowd inside of it watching the match.
|
|
Hunt. Hunt.
