|
Post by Michael Coello on Nov 18, 2007 21:49:21 GMT -5
I thought Danielson getting in the face of Nigel after he won the belt was a bit heelish, really.
|
|
|
Post by acressl on Nov 18, 2007 22:23:17 GMT -5
That makes sense, I guess. Still, a tweener shouldn't be able to get away with that. Even if wrestling the most dastardly heel of all time at a feud's bitter conclusion. Maybe a low blow here and there but not an all out nut assault. That's too heely imo. Well, it WAS a response to the attempt to BLIND Bryan. ;D Even so. The good guy is only the good guy because he doesn't use bad guy tactics. That makes his victory mean that much more. Granted, he's not a GOOD good guy, but he's the one the fans indentify as the good guy in this one, right?
|
|
|
Post by YouStayClassy on Nov 18, 2007 23:27:56 GMT -5
I thought Danielson getting in the face of Nigel after he won the belt was a bit heelish, really. That's what is so great about how ROH books Danielson... there's a good chance on one show he's a megaface, then a megaheel the next show.... and somehow it all works. The only comparison I can think of is Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels in 1997, depending on if Raw was taking place in the US or Canada.
|
|
|
Post by YouStayClassy on Nov 18, 2007 23:32:03 GMT -5
Well, it WAS a response to the attempt to BLIND Bryan. ;D Even so. The good guy is only the good guy because he doesn't use bad guy tactics. That makes his victory mean that much more. Granted, he's not a GOOD good guy, but he's the one the fans indentify as the good guy in this one, right? It's really gray. Danielson is the one the fans CHEER for, but he's not really the good guy.
|
|