|
|
Post by Well, Youre Wrong on Oct 27, 2007 22:13:47 GMT -5
Vince because I was there for that shitty PPV (except for Rock/Mankind match). Plus he did SQUADOOSH in that, there particular rumble.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Pacman Khan (akkilla) on Oct 27, 2007 22:24:13 GMT -5
people who say lex are also half saying bret.....
|
|
BxB
Unicron
Only the shift key stands between him and copyright infringement.
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by BxB on Oct 27, 2007 22:29:58 GMT -5
people who say lex are also half saying bret..... Umm, how so? We aren't saying 1994 had the worst rumble winner(s). We're just saying Luger wasn't good enough to win one. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam Pacman Khan (akkilla) on Oct 27, 2007 22:35:20 GMT -5
people who say lex are also half saying bret..... Umm, how so? We aren't saying 1994 had the worst rumble winner(s). We're just saying Luger wasn't good enough to win one. sarcasm. |
|
|
|
Post by kitsunestar on Oct 27, 2007 22:44:20 GMT -5
Rey was the worst winner, hands down.
|
|
|
|
Post by perpetualn00b on Oct 27, 2007 22:47:49 GMT -5
SCSA.
|
|
|
|
Post by I Graduated Warrior University on Oct 27, 2007 22:58:10 GMT -5
The OP says since Vince is technically not a wrestler, he doesn't count. So other than Vince, who would you pick? I say Vince does count since he has been many matches over the years. But, other than Vince, I would say Batista. But as bad as Batista is, he did attract a HUGE buyrate at WM21 I'd go with Rey, as awesome as he is, he didn't sell me as a main eventer |
|
|
|
Post by tap on Oct 27, 2007 22:59:13 GMT -5
Hulk Hogan, 1990. Not very necessary. I mean, yeah, it help set up the face versus face feud with the Warrior, but having the champion win it, eh, not that keen on the idea. Vince would be second, because that feud had enough heat going into it that it too wasn't that necessary, in my eyes.
|
|
WWHHHD
Unicron
Break it down for a 5 second pose!
Posts: 3,467
|
Post by WWHHHD on Oct 27, 2007 22:59:39 GMT -5
Bret Hart. Seriously why wasnt he good enough to win it by himself??? And then when he won it a few years later... oh wait SCSA won that one thats right.
|
|
h
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,734
|
Post by h on Oct 27, 2007 23:01:00 GMT -5
Shawn Michaels. Easily.
|
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Oct 27, 2007 23:21:40 GMT -5
I'd say Rey Mysterio.
Not because he's a bad wrestler, but it was IMO the worst reason for winning the Rumble and the aftermath was a disaster and did nothing good for him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2007 0:29:28 GMT -5
SCSA.... when i watched that Kane was definately the one to win...
not that he's a bad wrestler.... out of the ones i've seen... Tista and Mysterio
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Oct 28, 2007 0:36:15 GMT -5
The OP says since Vince is technically not a wrestler, he doesn't count. So other than Vince, who would you pick? I say Vince does count since he has been many matches over the years. But, other than Vince, I would say Batista. he's done the most after his rumble win worst choice austin in '97 |
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Oct 28, 2007 1:02:45 GMT -5
Big John Studd
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,183
|
Post by Mozenrath on Oct 28, 2007 1:25:21 GMT -5
Hacksaw, Big John, and Luger.
|
|
|
|
Post by popples on Oct 28, 2007 2:00:00 GMT -5
Rey for me. I thought the Batista win actually made sense storyline wise. It led to him turning face and challenging Triple H which I thought was one of the better feuds of that year.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,183
|
Post by Mozenrath on Oct 28, 2007 2:22:25 GMT -5
Rey for me. I thought the Batista win actually made sense storyline wise. It led to him turning face and challenging Triple H which I thought was one of the better feuds of that year. "WORST WRESTLER", not worst angle or reason. |
|
Indigocrates
Unicron
I got bored. Decided to become a philosopher. Just 'cause.
Posts: 2,953
|
Post by Indigocrates on Oct 28, 2007 2:25:47 GMT -5
Worst wrestler=Least ability
Batista FTL (Or is that FTW because he won the Rumble?).
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,183
|
Post by Mozenrath on Oct 28, 2007 2:31:18 GMT -5
Worst wrestler=Least ability Batista FTL (Or is that FTW because he won the Rumble?). Who knows? Is it sad that I don't even think he's the third worst? Man, Duggan was AWFUL, Studd was dull, and Luger, well, sucked. |
|
H-Fist
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,485
|
Post by H-Fist on Oct 28, 2007 3:40:26 GMT -5
I won't say that Hacksaw Duggan is a great wrestler in the technical/mat wrestling sense. But he has ALWAYS been over. In the old days, pre WWF, feuding with One Man Gang. In the WWF, always being the babyface who didn't EVER need a belt and could make sure a heel was in place to challenge Hogan down the road. Duggan knew how to work.
"Wrestling" =/= "Working" is the best way to put it. I respect quality workers as wrestlers, even if they aren't impressing in their "wrestling ability." Duggan will outchain no one. But regardless, he was over, and the 1st RR was a chance for an over guy to win something big without being part of the WWF title picture.
The same things I've said about Duggan could be used to justify Yokozuna, Taker, Rock, post-surgery Austin, Brock, Studd, and Batista. Rey, Bret, Chris, HBK, Trips, Flair, Hogan.
The winner is Luger. He is awful. Remember Lance Storm's Luger Theory: When in need of a serious promo, visualize a Lex Luger match and think of how much more money than you he gets paid. He couldn't wrestle, and he couldn't work. He had no charisma, no mic skills, and a complete inability to judge his own clothing sizes. Luger in a landslide. He was godawful. In terms of ability vs. accomplishment, he has to be in the top five disparity of all time.
|
|
