audace12
Trap-Jaw
Harris is God
Posts: 261
|
Post by audace12 on Jan 4, 2008 5:47:47 GMT -5
Raw did 2.6 ratings.Santino is sad  |
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Jan 4, 2008 6:02:54 GMT -5
2.6 on New Year's Eve ain't too shabby...
|
|
|
|
Post by SassovsHart on Jan 4, 2008 6:19:56 GMT -5
2.6 on New Year's Eve ain't too shabby... Yeah, I think most people expected a low rating because of New Year's Eve. Should be back to normal next week. |
|
|
|
Post by Baixo Astral on Jan 4, 2008 6:24:47 GMT -5
2.6 on New Year's Eve ain't too shabby... Yeah, I think most people expected a low rating because of New Year's Eve. Should be back to normal next week. Cue someone saying "That's no excuse! They always have an excuse!" |
|
|
|
Post by Mister Pigwell on Jan 4, 2008 6:49:55 GMT -5
*ahem*
That's no excuse! They always have an excuse!
|
|
lotus
Hans Moleman
Posts: 0
|
Post by lotus on Jan 4, 2008 6:57:16 GMT -5
*ahem* That's no excuse! They always have an excuse! As always they'll blame Chris Jericho, even though he didn't even wrestle on that show. |
|
TheKillShot
Don Corleone
The man with the flan.
Posts: 1,952
|
Post by TheKillShot on Jan 4, 2008 9:15:53 GMT -5
*ahem* That's no excuse! They always have an excuse! As always they'll blame Chris Jericho, even though he didn't even wrestle on that show. They'll blame Chris Jericho for not wrestling on the show! |
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jan 4, 2008 9:19:28 GMT -5
*ahem* That's no excuse! They always have an excuse! As always they'll blame Chris Jericho, even though he didn't even wrestle on that show. I don't think anyone would blame Jericho on a night where most people were more concerned with ringing in the new year than watching wrestling at a time where wrestling isn't as hot as it used to be. |
|
|
|
Post by I'm The Cool One on Jan 4, 2008 9:24:49 GMT -5
I blame Jericho on a night where most people were more concerned with ringing in the new year than watching wrestling at a time where wrestling isn't as hot as it used to be. If he had wrestled, RAW could have easily pulled a 16.4 rating!
|
|
|
|
Post by Metalheadbanger Man on Jan 4, 2008 9:25:17 GMT -5
That's actually not too bad considering. RAW Roulette, if hyped enough, should give them around or over 3.5.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Thread Barbi on Jan 4, 2008 9:46:38 GMT -5
Really? Man, time files. Last time I saw Raw, it was Raw version 1.059 Second Edition.
|
|
|
|
Post by I'm The Cool One on Jan 4, 2008 9:50:05 GMT -5
Really? Man, time files. Last time I saw Raw, it was Raw version 1.059 Second Edition. RAW is alot like AOL. Theres a new version every 12 seconds. It's now RAW 3.192 |
|
|
|
Post by nerdinitupagain on Jan 4, 2008 14:36:19 GMT -5
Not surprising. Usually the one time I watch Raw every 2 months is the time it does bad in ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by psychotix5000 on Jan 4, 2008 14:51:11 GMT -5
Really? Man, time files. Last time I saw Raw, it was Raw version 1.059 Second Edition. RAW is alot like AOL. Theres a new version every 12 seconds. It's now RAW 3.192 *checks* Now it's RAW 3.14159.... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2008 14:52:54 GMT -5
RAW is alot like AOL. Theres a new version every 12 seconds. It's now RAW 3.192 *checks* Now it's RAW 3.14159.... wait... so it went down?! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2008 14:54:49 GMT -5
If they had gillberg, they would have pulled at least a 7.
I asked Nash about it and he showed a diagram that proves it.
|
|
|
|
Post by psychotix5000 on Jan 5, 2008 3:28:58 GMT -5
*checks* Now it's RAW 3.14159.... wait... so it went down?! yeah, v3.192 was too buggy. I hear v4.20 should be out soon. |
|
icarus
Trap-Jaw
j-tex
Posts: 252
|
Post by icarus on Jan 5, 2008 6:28:49 GMT -5
well, it's to be somewhat expected, but for the first time in about 6 months, RAW had a well hyped main event that actually meant something rather than a thrown together tag match. i would have expected a 3.0+
|
|
