|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 31, 2008 16:32:38 GMT -5
Wait, who voted for "yes" PS.. I voted No also  . |
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jan 31, 2008 17:06:17 GMT -5
Nope, not really. That whole faux 'dream match' build for the match between him and Cena looked silly then, even moreso now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caglar13 on Jan 31, 2008 17:08:46 GMT -5
I don't really think so, he's been out for months and I'm sure most people (I know I did) don't even miss him. The only memorable things he did were his botched promos.
|
|
|
|
Post by valiens on Jan 31, 2008 17:08:55 GMT -5
Crap, does that mean another spot for test just opened?
|
|
|
|
Post by BrodietheSlayer on Jan 31, 2008 17:11:40 GMT -5
If it did, it was only in a GOOD way
|
|
|
|
Post by A Dubya (El Hombre Muerto) on Jan 31, 2008 17:18:56 GMT -5
I don't think it effected the WWE too much. They lost one of their main faces who they built up for about a year and a half, but I don't think it was as big a loss as when Christian left. He was getting so over with the crowd and was only losing matches to Batista all the time. Seems like many people (especially on here) hated the guy, so he had a very limited fanbase it seems. Overall, I think he is only a moderate loss to the company.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Peoples Elbow on Jan 31, 2008 18:21:16 GMT -5
Nope, it's the equivalent of taking out rotten garbage. Yep, I said it.
|
|
|
|
Post by rubber johnny on Jan 31, 2008 18:26:57 GMT -5
he's the worst wrestler in history
good riddance
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Jan 31, 2008 18:31:22 GMT -5
It will effect it but not very much. I think most people have pretty much forgotten him anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jan 31, 2008 18:32:18 GMT -5
I don't think Christian leaving really hurt the 'E either. I don't think it helped them really, but I don't think it was detrimental to them. On the flip side, it WAS beneficial to both Christian himself, and TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Jan 31, 2008 18:41:54 GMT -5
I might miss him if it was a couple yeas down the road an his ring skill improved. But now I won't even notice he's gone.
|
|
doytch
Trap-Jaw
hahaha
Posts: 298
|
Post by doytch on Jan 31, 2008 18:46:47 GMT -5
bobby lashley is gone and i have happy/ i thinking that wwe will make it look like he was never there before.
now bobby lashley can go film b movies like revenge of the guy who has look of muscular poo.
i voted no
|
|
|
|
Post by Kirk Angel on Jan 31, 2008 18:55:38 GMT -5
... and nothing of value was lost.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Jan 31, 2008 18:57:17 GMT -5
Guy had no business in the main event anyway. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
|
|
|
|
Post by VRM: LET'S GO BLUESHIRTS!! on Jan 31, 2008 19:09:41 GMT -5
And I ask....Tomko.  |
|
|
|
Post by Veladus Jobs To Dead Computers on Jan 31, 2008 22:40:11 GMT -5
I would say the departure doesn't hurt WWE, but it doesn't help either. Lashley could've given the company another option for feuds, storylines, etc. But they're doing well for now, so they'll survive. What he said. It's a bit silly IMO to say how incredibly terrible he was and how much better off we are without him, but his leaving is barely a blip on the radar. He was a flash in the pan, plain and simple. |
|
|
|
Post by skiller on Jan 31, 2008 22:43:47 GMT -5
I think it might have affected some long term plans. But as a whole, not enough to really screw things up too much.
|
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
Post by NIXON on Jan 31, 2008 22:45:12 GMT -5
I dunno, the thing about Buhby is he duminade, so obviously his exit leaves a big hole in the roster.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Jan 31, 2008 22:46:28 GMT -5
I won't be petty about it, but in all honesty, I didn't even realize he was gone untill about three weeks ago. What does that tell you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Da (No Sold) 7-1-3 Itch on Jan 31, 2008 22:48:30 GMT -5
|
|
.
