|
|
Post by Youngie on Oct 3, 2009 13:40:05 GMT -5
Extended lineage counts so Bulldog and Neidhart are in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slingshot Suplay on Oct 3, 2009 13:43:39 GMT -5
If we're counting in-laws, then Dynamite Kid. If not, then Bret.
|
|
|
|
Post by britishbulldog on Oct 3, 2009 19:13:57 GMT -5
If we're counting in-laws, then Dynamite Kid. If not, then Bret. This! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2009 19:15:47 GMT -5
Stu. I cannot go against anyone that could kick as much ass as he did even at 403.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Diamond on Oct 3, 2009 22:26:20 GMT -5
Of the ones I've seen enough of I would say Bret.
|
|
blackdeath
AC Slater
The Chocolate Teddy Bear
Posts: 159
|
Post by blackdeath on Oct 3, 2009 22:32:00 GMT -5
I have to go with Owen Hart , yes bret was really good. but I seen Owen do it all in the Ring
he was a all around wrestler, able to work with anyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by derrtaysouth95 on Oct 3, 2009 22:34:04 GMT -5
If we're counting in-laws, then Dynamite Kid. If not, then Bret. This! This except replace Bret with Owen.  |
|
Schemer
Don Corleone
Total class wit' a capital K!
Posts: 1,950
|
Post by Schemer on Oct 4, 2009 4:27:30 GMT -5
I tend to go against the grain and prefer Owen. He was just as good a worker and he had five times the charisma of anyone else in his family, and that makes him better, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on Oct 4, 2009 5:24:22 GMT -5
Bret was the best all-around wrestler, Owen was great but I don't think he ever hit his peak, so sadly he wasn't able to rise above Bret (IMO).
|
|
|
|
Post by thesam07 on Oct 4, 2009 5:28:29 GMT -5
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be.
|
|
Mac
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 16,502
|
Post by Mac on Oct 4, 2009 10:15:05 GMT -5
Owen, for the simple reason that he could just do more than Bret. I'd compare Owen to an Eddie Guerrero and Bret more like a Chris Benoit, and I always enjoyed Guerrero's style more.
|
|
|
|
Post by JerryvonKramer on Oct 4, 2009 10:25:00 GMT -5
I love the way Youngie included Keith and Bruce. They sure gave those knights a seeing to.  |
|
|
|
Post by simplydurhamcalling on Oct 4, 2009 10:41:12 GMT -5
I don't think Dynamite was an in-law. I believe he married Bret's wife's friend Michelle? According to Bret's book anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Youngie on Oct 4, 2009 14:19:39 GMT -5
I don't think Dynamite was an in-law. I believe he married Bret's wife's friend Michelle? According to Bret's book anyway. Dynamite was married to the sister of Bret Hart's first wife. Does that make him an in-law? |
|
|
|
Post by Youngie on Oct 4, 2009 14:21:06 GMT -5
I love the way Youngie included Keith and Bruce. They sure gave those knights a seeing to. They're both damn good technical wrestlers but they're not getting to much love [so far] in this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Oct 5, 2009 16:59:56 GMT -5
I have to go with Owen Hart , yes bret was really good. but I seen Owen do it all in the Ring he was a all around wrestler, able to work with anyone. This Bret Hart was an excellent technical wrestler. Owen Hart was an amazing all round wrestler who could mix it up any style with anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Oct 5, 2009 17:03:12 GMT -5
I love the way Youngie included Keith and Bruce. They sure gave those knights a seeing to. Ya ;D I have this PPV (Survivor Series 1993) on DVD. Talk about who's who of wrestlecrap ;D It was still a very fun event though ;D |
|
Phil Parent
El Dandy
Your Favourite Teacher
Posts: 8,508
|
Post by Phil Parent on Oct 5, 2009 19:42:37 GMT -5
Owen was the most complete. Lots that Owen could do, Bret couldn't. But Owen could do most of what Bret could.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Oct 5, 2009 20:57:59 GMT -5
It's impossible to know. I guess I'd have to say Dynamite had the most potental, Bret had the best oppertunity to use his talent and Owen had the frequent misfortune of politics to hold him back. But who was the best? I have no idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by markdown474 on Oct 6, 2009 7:06:09 GMT -5
I have to go with Owen Hart , yes bret was really good. but I seen Owen do it all in the Ring he was a all around wrestler, able to work with anyone. Owen was awesome but I gotta give the nod to Bret for one big reason; the botched pile driver on Steve Austin. It nearly ended his career. Bret always said what he was most proud of was the fact that he never injured another wrestler to the point where they couldn't work the next day, and in a "fake" sport, that has to be taken into consideration. Bret gets my vote. On a different note, I'd love to hear the reasoning behind choosing Bruce or Keith. They may be solid, but can you realisticly put either on the level of Bret or Owen??? |
|
