ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Nov 17, 2009 23:20:19 GMT -5
I read Hannibal first years and years after watching both movies the first time and just started reading The Silence of the lambs so can't really say from book to film on that.
I do however based on film alone, think Julianne Moore was better on all levels and gave her moore depth
|
|
Phosphor Glow
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Is a real girl!
Posts: 19,883 
|
Post by Phosphor Glow on Nov 18, 2009 1:42:51 GMT -5
I liked Jodie better, but both were honestly fantastic in the role. I never read the books, so I couldn't say for accuracy there, but regardless I think they were both great.
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,849
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Nov 18, 2009 1:48:20 GMT -5
I was just hoping for a *thpthpthpthpthp* in the thread  |
|
|
|
Post by markdown474 on Nov 18, 2009 9:06:37 GMT -5
I voted for Jodie Foster but I suppose it's easy considering Silence of the Lambs was 100 times better than Hannibal IMO. There was nothing wrong with Julianne Moore's performance, but she definitely had less to work with.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Nov 18, 2009 13:03:36 GMT -5
^Dino and his crabby wife DeLaurentis demanded Tom harris hurry up and finish writing Hannibal so they could do the sequle they paid money for the rights to. Erg the film version of Hannibal missed quite a bit because they felt that they could not show exactly what he wrote. IMO Harris intentionally made stuff immpossible to film just to spite the DeLaurentises
|
|
