|
|
Post by Ryushinku on Nov 4, 2009 3:57:34 GMT -5
I eagerly look forward to the inevitable stories that Punk now has NUCLEAR HEEEEAT due to forgotting to tie his shoelaces up properly or something and will be jobbing to R-Truth around the country.
|
|
|
|
Post by stormwrestling on Nov 4, 2009 5:03:07 GMT -5
Hate to say it, but Smackdown was way better when Taker was injured and Batista was still on Raw. Starting to take a Raw-like turn..... Glad I'm not the only one! I actually preferred it when Jeff was still around. Now I read the spoilers every week to see if it's watchable. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2009 6:40:45 GMT -5
Well, good thing I dropped SmackDown after Hell in a Cell (and had only been watching the first half for months anyway) 'cause this show sounds awful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Metalheadbanger Man on Nov 4, 2009 9:05:17 GMT -5
Morrison has lost 3 matches in a row now.
I never thought I'd see the day.
Show sounds...a little meh to be honest. I don't like the idea of Punk becoming a "everyone's against me" whiny heel to be honest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cactus Jack on Nov 4, 2009 14:20:14 GMT -5
Smackdown sure looks like it sucks this week. :/
|
|
nonrev
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,304
|
Post by nonrev on Nov 5, 2009 0:22:35 GMT -5
Hate to say it, but Smackdown was way better when Taker was injured and Batista was still on Raw. Starting to take a Raw-like turn..... Glad I'm not the only one! I actually preferred it when Jeff was still around. Now I read the spoilers every week to see if it's watchable. I second both motions. Haven't watched since Tista returned, and I don't believe I've missed too much. |
|
|
|
Post by carter 15 on Nov 5, 2009 8:18:52 GMT -5
Doesn't look like the greatest or even that good, but Punk vs. Armstrong/Refs could be fun. People will bitch and say he's buried though. He went from World Heavyweight Champion/Contender to fighting refs. That's not burried but, it's sitting in the grave and, playing catch with C4 in the middle of a flood. It's not sitting in a grave, it's just having a career. |
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Nov 5, 2009 8:48:31 GMT -5
I don't want to jump to conclusions about what they're doing with Punk just yet, but I have to say that so far I'm not very happy. He was picking up so much steam after he ran Jeff Hardy out of WWE, and then they had a half-crippled Undertaker come in and just squash all of his heat. It should be Punk in that title match with Jericho and Big Show.
|
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Nov 5, 2009 9:17:18 GMT -5
An All-heel triple threat match.
That would work..........not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psy on Nov 5, 2009 11:26:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Reptar on Nov 5, 2009 11:36:24 GMT -5
Batista did a quick backstage interview with Josh Matthews. When they did a close up of Dave's face you could see his lovely nose stud. Cause nothing says heel better than a small pin in your nose Except for a belly button tattoo. |
|
|
|
Post by primetime110 on Nov 5, 2009 12:10:01 GMT -5
I don't want to jump to conclusions about what they're doing with Punk just yet, but I have to say that so far I'm not very happy. He was picking up so much steam after he ran Jeff Hardy out of WWE, and then they had a half-crippled Undertaker come in and just squash all of his heat. It should be Punk in that title match with Jericho and Big Show. Taker hasn't been in known by the public taking drugs like Jeff Hardy has. Wrestlers like Edge, HHH used that gainst Jeff like punk did. But can also do great promos against other wrestlers, drug users or not. punk cannot. If there is not drug history, He has nothing to say of importance. His promos are 1 dimensional. |
|
|
|
Post by "Dashing" Dr.VonPhoenix on Nov 5, 2009 13:56:23 GMT -5
I don't want to jump to conclusions about what they're doing with Punk just yet, but I have to say that so far I'm not very happy. He was picking up so much steam after he ran Jeff Hardy out of WWE, and then they had a half-crippled Undertaker come in and just squash all of his heat. It should be Punk in that title match with Jericho and Big Show. Taker hasn't been in known by the public taking drugs like Jeff Hardy has. Wrestlers like Edge, HHH used that gainst Jeff like punk did. But can also do great promos against other wrestlers, drug users or not. punk cannot. If there is not drug history, He has nothing to say of importance. His promos are 1 dimensional. This is exactly how I feel. Well said, sir. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2009 14:01:39 GMT -5
Dolph & The Hart Dynasty sound like a good team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Apricots And A Pear Tree on Nov 5, 2009 14:22:38 GMT -5
Wouldn't it be crazy if this Punk/Armstrong thing is leading to the return of Road Dogg? i like it |
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Nov 5, 2009 20:07:19 GMT -5
I don't want to jump to conclusions about what they're doing with Punk just yet, but I have to say that so far I'm not very happy. He was picking up so much steam after he ran Jeff Hardy out of WWE, and then they had a half-crippled Undertaker come in and just squash all of his heat. It should be Punk in that title match with Jericho and Big Show. Taker hasn't been in known by the public taking drugs like Jeff Hardy has. Wrestlers like Edge, HHH used that gainst Jeff like punk did. But can also do great promos against other wrestlers, drug users or not. punk cannot. If there is not drug history, He has nothing to say of importance. His promos are 1 dimensional. If you think Punk can't cut a good promo that's not about drugs then you clearly have a bias against the guy, because he's a great talker in general. If he's handed a mic and has a point to make, he's fantastic. Look at his promo against Batista last year at the Bash. Drugs or alcohol were never brought into the equation. Also, Punk is leaps and bounds better on the mic than Undertaker, Batista, and Randy Orton. They're never taken out of the main event due to lack of decent promos. |
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Nov 5, 2009 20:25:38 GMT -5
Also, Punk is leaps and bounds better on the mic than Undertaker. Yeah. No. You wanna talk about bias. |
|
|
|
Post by primetime110 on Nov 5, 2009 20:26:40 GMT -5
Taker hasn't been in known by the public taking drugs like Jeff Hardy has. Wrestlers like Edge, HHH used that gainst Jeff like punk did. But can also do great promos against other wrestlers, drug users or not. punk cannot. If there is not drug history, He has nothing to say of importance. His promos are 1 dimensional. If you think Punk can't cut a good promo that's not about drugs then you clearly have a bias against the guy, because he's a great talker in general. If he's handed a mic and has a point to make, he's fantastic. Look at his promo against Batista last year at the Bash. Drugs or alcohol were never brought into the equation. Also, Punk is leaps and bounds better on the mic than Undertaker, Batista, and Randy Orton. They're never taken out of the main event due to lack of decent promos. Yeah, Thats it. If anyone thinks punks promos aren't the greatest thing in the world, It has to be a bias and not an honest opinion. I don't like him, But that has nothing to do with I think his promos are 1 dimensional. Maybe you think all of punks promos are great because your a punk fan? That has to be it. See what I did there? His drug promos against Hardy was done by other wrestlers as well. How is his promos going so far after the Hardy fued? His Hardy promos were overated anyway. So when HHH, Orton, Taker hate threads or post pop up, Is it peoples opinion on the matter or bias on those wrestlers? |
|
|
|
Post by Bubble Lead on Nov 5, 2009 20:27:51 GMT -5
An All-heel triple threat match. That would work..........not. I am pretty sure he more meant that Punk should be in the Triple Threat instead of Undertaker, and they could book the other participants accordingly. Anyway, its not like it would be the first all heel wrestling match ever on PPV and they could have easily modified the feud by having either Punk or Show act more facelike. |
|
|
|
Post by Bubble Lead on Nov 5, 2009 20:31:27 GMT -5
If you think Punk can't cut a good promo that's not about drugs then you clearly have a bias against the guy, because he's a great talker in general. If he's handed a mic and has a point to make, he's fantastic. Look at his promo against Batista last year at the Bash. Drugs or alcohol were never brought into the equation. Also, Punk is leaps and bounds better on the mic than Undertaker, Batista, and Randy Orton. They're never taken out of the main event due to lack of decent promos. Yeah, Thats it. If anyone thinks punks promos aren't the greatest thing in the world, It has to be a bias and not an honest opinion. I don't like him, But that has nothing to do with I think his promos are 1 dimensional. Maybe you think all of punks promos are great because your a punk fan? That has to be it. See what I did there? His drug promos against Hardy was done by other wrstlers as well. How is his promos going so far after the Hardy fued? His Hardy promos were overated anyway. So when HHH, Orton, Taker hate threads or post pop up, Is it peoples opinion on the matter or bias on said wrestlers? I am not the biggest CM Punk fan ever, but even I think its pretty obvious that his promos are better than Orton, Batista, or Taker [current version]. I dont even see how that is debatable. Orton is flat and boring on the mic and just sounds like he is reading off a script. Batista has never been known for his promos. Taker barely talks and when he does its the same old basic stuff. At least Punk has some sort of dimension and emotion in his promos. |
|
