|
Post by psychokiller on Jan 10, 2010 22:28:43 GMT -5
Im pretty knowledgeable about the case, and personally I feel that there was 2 people involved in the killings. Obviously OJ was one since his blood was all over the place, and there would have been no time at all to plant all that blood evidence in different areas in a really short time. The other person was probably his son Jason, who at the time of the killings was mysteriously gone from his job. It's said he carried knives around with him too since he was a chef or something. But anyways, there definetely had to be 2 people involved since one had to get rid of all the evidence and all as well. There was only a 1hr 15min time frame for the murderer(s) to go to Nicoles' house and kill her and Ron Goldman, and then to drive back. I really doubt OJ did it himself.
|
|
Viva
Dennis Stamp
THAT'S MY PURSE! *kick to the groin*
You can dance if you want to.
Posts: 4,099
|
Post by Viva on Jan 10, 2010 22:30:35 GMT -5
This is absolutely by far the most random thread I have come across in quite a while.
With that being said, the takes that some of you guys have and the things I've learned about the case (I was about 8 or 9 at the time of the verdict) is pretty fascinating.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Jan 10, 2010 22:31:05 GMT -5
Im pretty knowledgeable about the case, and personally I feel that there was 2 people involved in the killings. Obviously OJ was one since his blood was all over the place, and there would have been no time at all to plant all that blood evidence in different areas in a really short time. The other person was probably his son Jason, who at the time of the killings was mysteriously gone from his job. It's said he carried knives around with him too since he was a chef or something. But anyways, there definetely had to be 2 people involved since one had to get rid of all the evidence and all as well. There was only a 1hr 15min time frame for the murderer(s) to go to Nicoles' house and kill her and Ron Goldman, and then to drive back. I really doubt OJ did it himself. That's actually a pretty good theory, and since the murder almost certainly would have been premeditated, they would have had to have had 2 people involved to do it in the timeframe.
|
|
Viva
Dennis Stamp
THAT'S MY PURSE! *kick to the groin*
You can dance if you want to.
Posts: 4,099
|
Post by Viva on Jan 10, 2010 22:32:55 GMT -5
Also, the addition of "Confessions from the Killer" is absolutely hilarious. The Goldmans bought the rights to the book, and then added that little subtext. Haha.
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Jan 10, 2010 22:34:09 GMT -5
I'm not going into the whole case thing here mainly because I can see it just leading to a thred that gets locked. I will say that it is extremely unlikely that anyone other than O.J Simpson murdered Nichole Brown and Ron Goldman. However I don't think that they way the media turned on the jury for getting it "wrong" was fair in anyway. The Los Angeles County DA's office failed to present the strongest possible case and OJ's lawyers did their consitutional duty by blowing enough holes in the State case to gain an aquittal. The evidence that the jury saw was far more limited than what the general public saw on TV. Based upon what they saw alone it is easier to see why the found OJ not guilty of a capital offense.
|
|
|
Post by psychokiller on Jan 10, 2010 22:43:30 GMT -5
Im pretty knowledgeable about the case, and personally I feel that there was 2 people involved in the killings. Obviously OJ was one since his blood was all over the place, and there would have been no time at all to plant all that blood evidence in different areas in a really short time. The other person was probably his son Jason, who at the time of the killings was mysteriously gone from his job. It's said he carried knives around with him too since he was a chef or something. But anyways, there definetely had to be 2 people involved since one had to get rid of all the evidence and all as well. There was only a 1hr 15min time frame for the murderer(s) to go to Nicoles' house and kill her and Ron Goldman, and then to drive back. I really doubt OJ did it himself. That's actually a pretty good theory, and since the murder almost certainly would have been premeditated, they would have had to have had 2 people involved to do it in the timeframe. Yep. Now, for the reason I think he did it. Some say he's a sociopath, but if he really was I think he would have killed someone wayyyyy earlier in his life. I think the real reason he did it was because he probably suffers from undiagnosed Narcisstic Personality Disorder. If he didn't have it there's no way the Vegas Memorobilia robbery would have happened either. I mean everyone has probably seen him go ballistic in the Las Vegas robbery. He wanted back what he thought was rightfully his. A trait of NPD. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by toddpolt on Jan 10, 2010 22:50:58 GMT -5
Im pretty knowledgeable about the case, and personally I feel that there was 2 people involved in the killings. Obviously OJ was one since his blood was all over the place, and there would have been no time at all to plant all that blood evidence in different areas in a really short time. The other person was probably his son Jason, who at the time of the killings was mysteriously gone from his job. It's said he carried knives around with him too since he was a chef or something. But anyways, there definetely had to be 2 people involved since one had to get rid of all the evidence and all as well. There was only a 1hr 15min time frame for the murderer(s) to go to Nicoles' house and kill her and Ron Goldman, and then to drive back. I really doubt OJ did it himself. I have a really dumb question. Why would the son willingly do this? I'm not going into the whole case thing here mainly because I can see it just leading to a thred that gets locked. I will say that it is extremely unlikely that anyone other than O.J Simpson murdered Nichole Brown and Ron Goldman. However I don't think that they way the media turned on the jury for getting it "wrong" was fair in anyway. The Los Angeles County DA's office failed to present the strongest possible case and OJ's lawyers did their consitutional duty by blowing enough holes in the State case to gain an aquittal. The evidence that the jury saw was far more limited than what the general public saw on TV. Based upon what they saw alone it is easier to see why the found OJ not guilty of a capital offense. ^This Again as I said it before, the LAPD botched the forensics. Anyone ever see that HBO program Autopsy where pathologist Michael Baden* talked about testifying to the less-than-helpful LAPD work? Tons of people, even his co-workers and fellow colleagues, all nailed him for helping O.J. "get off" but he clearly makes a concise argument of why the LAPD lab and field work was not a "smoking gun" whatsoever. Fascinating stuff, he seems to have crediblity. *=Same guy who did autopsy on Sid Vicious (the rocker)
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jan 10, 2010 22:52:30 GMT -5
They didn't buy the rights, they got them through the courts thanks to their civil win.
|
|
|
Post by psychokiller on Jan 10, 2010 22:58:07 GMT -5
Im pretty knowledgeable about the case, and personally I feel that there was 2 people involved in the killings. Obviously OJ was one since his blood was all over the place, and there would have been no time at all to plant all that blood evidence in different areas in a really short time. The other person was probably his son Jason, who at the time of the killings was mysteriously gone from his job. It's said he carried knives around with him too since he was a chef or something. But anyways, there definetely had to be 2 people involved since one had to get rid of all the evidence and all as well. There was only a 1hr 15min time frame for the murderer(s) to go to Nicoles' house and kill her and Ron Goldman, and then to drive back. I really doubt OJ did it himself. I have a really dumb question. Why would the son willingly do this? I'm not going into the whole case thing here mainly because I can see it just leading to a thred that gets locked. I will say that it is extremely unlikely that anyone other than O.J Simpson murdered Nichole Brown and Ron Goldman. However I don't think that they way the media turned on the jury for getting it "wrong" was fair in anyway. The Los Angeles County DA's office failed to present the strongest possible case and OJ's lawyers did their consitutional duty by blowing enough holes in the State case to gain an aquittal. The evidence that the jury saw was far more limited than what the general public saw on TV. Based upon what they saw alone it is easier to see why the found OJ not guilty of a capital offense. ^This Again as I said it before, the LAPD botched the forensics. Anyone ever see that HBO program Autopsy where pathologist Michael Baden* talked about testifying to the less-than-helpful LAPD work? Tons of people, even his co-workers and fellow colleagues, all nailed him for helping O.J. "get off" but he clearly makes a concise argument of why the LAPD lab and field work was not a "smoking gun" whatsoever. Fascinating stuff, he seems to have crediblity. *=Same guy who did autopsy on Sid Vicious (the rocker) Well, the son has IED(Intermittent Explosive Disorder) *same disorder that Randy Orton said he had last year in the HHH storyline* If someone has that then their bound to do some crazy shit. I've also heard that for some reason or another that he was jealous of Nicole. He wanted to be with her supposedly. *She was his step-mom since OJ had Jason with another woman* I guess he probably would be extremely upset with her because he most likely seen her with Ron Goldman a lot.
|
|