|
|
Post by dlg3000 on Dec 26, 2009 0:24:05 GMT -5
What if the Attitude Era began this decade instead of the 1990s?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Dec 26, 2009 0:26:02 GMT -5
Then I guess right now would be the equivalent of late 1999?
Which sounds AWESOME right now. No PG, no Raw guest hosts, and NO GOD DAMN HORNSWOGGLE!
As much as I thought the early McMahon-Helmsley regime stuff wasn't all that great, I would take it in a heartbeat over any 'Swoggle "fun"
|
|
Fade
Patti Mayonnaise
Posts: 38,305
|
Post by Fade on Dec 26, 2009 0:26:11 GMT -5
If they had the same programming, same style, same wrestlers, it'd be more succesfull than what's currently going on but I doubt it'd be as pivotal as it was in the tail-end of the 90s. And I loved the Attitude Era..I just don't think it compliments the current last few years...
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Dec 26, 2009 0:40:55 GMT -5
Well then they'd have several years to suffer through before things got any better in their war.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Dragon on Dec 26, 2009 0:43:02 GMT -5
Well, seeing that WWF was close to filing Chapter 11 in 1995, there would be no WWE in 2000's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cry Me a Wiggle on Dec 26, 2009 0:56:52 GMT -5
It'd have to be the WCW Attitude era, because there'd be no WWF/WWE.
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Dec 26, 2009 0:57:14 GMT -5
The era was indeed a do or die period for them.
|
|
barley96
Dennis Stamp
This is the biggest Mickie James mark
Posts: 4,170
|
Post by barley96 on Dec 26, 2009 1:49:55 GMT -5
I would not be on here complaining about how disgusted I am with wrestling. This would happen 8 years later when WWE takes a sharp downward spiral into the abyss.
|
|
