TheDieselTrain
Fry's dog Seymour
Chicks Dig Hootie.
Is Stone Cold gonna have to smack a bitch?? WHAT!!!?????
Posts: 23,724
|
Post by TheDieselTrain on Jan 14, 2010 12:09:36 GMT -5
Seriously its so damn annoying and makes me not want to look at your videos. This definately is a peeve when watching wrestling on there and them trying to take credit for making the video. Or if they put a little intro saying so and so productions or something equally as dumb. If I had hair to pull out I probably would.
|
|
Dirty Hazy
Hank Scorpio
Pictured Above: The Future Mrs. Hazy
Posts: 5,008 
|
Post by Dirty Hazy on Jan 14, 2010 12:24:09 GMT -5
agreed
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJacketY2J on Jan 14, 2010 12:47:51 GMT -5
It makes no sense when they show an old wrestling match from an episode of Raw and put their names on it as if they are copyrighting it. It's not yours just because you posted it.
|
|
|
|
Post by aka Cthulhu on Jan 14, 2010 12:51:57 GMT -5
I remember one that had a two-minute long intro, with music! Gah.
|
|
Grendel
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
But ... why is all the rum gone?
Posts: 17,593
|
Post by Grendel on Jan 14, 2010 13:11:53 GMT -5
This is Youtube, a place where a guy named Fred can be a star. None of it makes any sense.
Not that there aren't any Freds that deserve to be stars, like Mr. Fred Astaire, but this Fred just is an unfunny douche.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster on Jan 14, 2010 15:21:52 GMT -5
The main reason would be to stop other users from re-uploading their footage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Carroll on Jan 14, 2010 15:41:41 GMT -5
The main reason would be to stop other users from re-uploading their footage. Which honestly is stupid. With the WWE getting aggressive from time to time about videos on Youtube breaking copyrights, it's really beneficial to allow others to re-upload the footage instead of "copyrighing" it yourself in a futile attempt to look cool on the internet. |
|
default
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Blames Everything On Snitsky. Yes, Even THAT.
Posts: 17,056
|
Post by default on Jan 14, 2010 23:24:19 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't get it. At least it's not as annoying as people putting their cameras up to their TVs to show stuff. If you can't figure out how to do it the right way, don't do it at all.
Seriously, it was lame in the 80's-90's when people started getting their first camcorders. It's still lame and incredibly dated.
|
|
Malcolm
Grimlock
Wanted something done about the color of his ring.
May contain ADHD
Posts: 13,505
|
Post by Malcolm on Jan 14, 2010 23:48:25 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't get it. At least it's not as annoying as people putting their cameras up to their TVs to show stuff. If you can't figure out how to do it the right way, don't do it at all. Seriously, it was lame in the 80's-90's when people started getting their first camcorders. It's still lame and incredibly dated. This. This. A thousand times this. You have no idea how frustrating it is to finally find an episode of a show or some gameplay footage of a game you're interested only to see it's just some douche putting a camera to the TV. |
|
|
|
Post by ani on Jan 14, 2010 23:50:19 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't get it. At least it's not as annoying as people putting their cameras up to their TVs to show stuff. If you can't figure out how to do it the right way, don't do it at all. Seriously, it was lame in the 80's-90's when people started getting their first camcorders. It's still lame and incredibly dated. This. This. A thousand times this. You have no idea how frustrating it is to finally find an episode of a show or some gameplay footage of a game you're interested only to see it's just some douche putting a camera to the TV. Homestar Runner made fun of that: |
|
|
|
Post by wildojinx on Jan 15, 2010 0:27:51 GMT -5
I kind of do get annoyed at the history of comics on film vids using that 1 minute intro, but at least its the instrumental version of the Iron Man theme and i cant really hate that.
|
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Jan 15, 2010 3:14:44 GMT -5
I remember one that had a two-minute long intro, with music! Gah. It makes no sense when they show an old wrestling match from an episode of Raw and put their names on it as if they are copyrighting it. It's not yours just because you posted it. I think thats the worst. I mean even if/when I make wrestling videos, with hours of effort put in (over a few weeks/months), I still at the most put maybe a 1-2 second title card thing, and that's at the end. The thing that makes it worse is when they make up some bulls*** "Production Company" as well... |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Walsh is Insane. on Jan 15, 2010 13:08:23 GMT -5
They took the time to upload copyrighted material, they should have a chance to shine...
|
|
|
|
Post by SsnakeBite, the No1 Frenchman on Jan 15, 2010 13:42:23 GMT -5
's understandable when they really created the video and didn't just post a clip of a copyrighted material, as many people on YouTube don't hesitate to rip videos and upload them as if they created them.
Then again, I do find intros kinda annoying, and pretty useless since they can be cut. I have no problem with (discreet) watermarks though.
|
|
Thrillho
Dennis Stamp
0 Days since last "incident"james.anderson1989jamesandersonmusicJimBillAnderson
Posts: 3,740
|
Post by Thrillho on Jan 15, 2010 15:19:30 GMT -5
My favourite tubism is "No Copyright Infringement Intended" in the description box.
Yeah, I'm giving away your intellectual property for free, but I didn't mean to give away your intellectual property for fr... wait.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2010 16:11:43 GMT -5
I'd love to see director's do that.
People'd be watching Pearl Habor with Michael Bay's name in the corner the whole time.
Wait a tic - no one watches Pearl Habor.
Well - you get the idea.
|
|
Dirty Hazy
Hank Scorpio
Pictured Above: The Future Mrs. Hazy
Posts: 5,008
|
Post by Dirty Hazy on Jan 16, 2010 1:06:52 GMT -5
This is Youtube, a place where a guy named Fred can be a star. None of it makes any sense. Not that there aren't any Freds that deserve to be stars, like Mr. Fred Astaire, but this Fred just is an unfunny douche. Fred is funny as hell, especially when I thought he was real and not an act! |
|
|
|
Post by Lair of the Shadow MaDaBa on Jan 16, 2010 1:55:25 GMT -5
Y'know what annoys me? When people use their YouTube names to copyright their videos. I know that there's a Fair Use Act, but we're all grown-ups here, aren't we? Use your real name to copyright your material. Even though everyone knows him as "The Spoony One", Noah Antwiler uses his own name in the credits, same with Doug Walker, Lewis Lovhaug, James Rolfe, et al. Cinderella Man wasn't directed by Richie Cunningham; it was written by Ron Howard! If you don't use your real name (or a made-up name that you legally trademark), you shouldn't be able to copyright anything under it.
What if someone uses without consent and you try to sue them? They can argue that nowhere in the video is Chris Lonelyguy credited, Chapstick49 is. Since no one on the earth is officially named or trademarked "Chapstick49", the copyright doesn't exist and it falls under public domain.
Point is, when posting videos on YouTube or Dailymotion or whatever, PLEASE PUT YOUR REAL NAME SOMEWHERE, just for the sake of showing that you're a damn adult.
|
|
sloride
Unicron
Doesn't Suck Up. Or Does She?
The Greatest Entertainer to have ever Lived
Posts: 3,196
|
Post by sloride on Jan 16, 2010 4:36:51 GMT -5
The main reason would be to stop other users from re-uploading their footage. Its annoying when people do it with footage that isn't their's but when people have made excellent tribute videos which obviously take a lot of time I would be be pissed if someone stole it and claimed it as their own so I can understand it. |
|
