|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Apr 13, 2010 23:36:08 GMT -5
“My belt holds my pants up, but the belt loops hold my belt up. So which ones the real hero?”
~ Mitch Hedberg
So lets settle this once and for all.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Booty Disciple on Apr 13, 2010 23:37:08 GMT -5
er...what are these "pants" and belt you speak of? I prefer to just pad around in my ratty old BVDs, thanks very much.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Apr 13, 2010 23:40:55 GMT -5
The Belt has been mooching off pants for years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Insomniac on Apr 13, 2010 23:43:01 GMT -5
The Belt has been mooching off pants for years. The pants wouldn't have made it nearly as far as they have without the belt. |
|
BorneAgain
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,467
Member is Online
|
Post by BorneAgain on Apr 13, 2010 23:46:55 GMT -5
If you buy a fitting size pants, you don't need the belt.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Apr 13, 2010 23:47:57 GMT -5
The Belt has been mooching off pants for years. The pants wouldn't have made it nearly as far as they have without the belt. I didn't wear a belt with my pants for years and not once did they fall down! |
|
|
|
Post by Banjo Is Broken on Apr 13, 2010 23:48:22 GMT -5
They both lose out to suspenders. Just ask any self-respecting Amish man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clarence "Showstealer" Mason on Apr 13, 2010 23:55:37 GMT -5
 These men do not approve of this thread |
|
|
|
Post by Insomniac on Apr 13, 2010 23:57:57 GMT -5
The pants wouldn't have made it nearly as far as they have without the belt. I didn't wear a belt with my pants for years and not once did they fall down! You got lucky. Just keep this in mind: There will come a day (maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but probably the day after tomorrow) where you're walking around beltless, not a care in the world. But all of a sudden, your pants will start to slip. You won't notice it at first because it's so slight, but they'll continue to slide down slowly. By the time you realize it, it's too late: they're hanging around by your knees. You're humiliated as everyone watches and laughs at your unfortunate predicament. All of that could've been prevented had you not underestimated the power of the belt.  |
|
|
|
Post by Error on Apr 14, 2010 0:07:24 GMT -5
What do all great athletes fight over? Belts. Therefore belts are superior to pants.
|
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Apr 14, 2010 3:44:52 GMT -5
I knew the thread would be about this.
But, the pants, without the pants, the belt would just be some thing sitting on the floor. Pants have survived without belts for years!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kris Kobain on Apr 14, 2010 5:50:11 GMT -5
Pants!
Not all pants require belts.
But then again not all belts require pants.....
dang
|
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Apr 14, 2010 5:56:08 GMT -5
In any argument, pants beats no pants.
|
|
JDS
Tommy Wiseau
Posts: 85
|
Post by JDS on Apr 14, 2010 6:07:42 GMT -5
Pants are superior.
You can go out in public wearing pants with no belt without too much trouble. It would be much more problematic if you were to go outside wearing just the belt with no pants.
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJacketY2J on Apr 14, 2010 8:38:16 GMT -5
They both lose out to suspenders. Just ask any self-respecting Amish man. I can vouch for this. |
|
|
|
Post by Apricots And A Pear Tree on Apr 14, 2010 11:37:04 GMT -5
Pants.You can get away with wearing pants without a belt;but the other way around?Not so much.
|
|
Tapout
Hank Scorpio
WWE Creative(TM)
W.W.W.Y.K.I.
Posts: 6,919
|
Post by Tapout on Apr 14, 2010 11:58:54 GMT -5
In any argument, pants beats no pants no pants beats pants. You have made a crucial error that I will fix for you but once. |
|
|
|
Post by Insomniac on Apr 14, 2010 12:26:35 GMT -5
In any argument, pants beats no pants. A couple second-generation wrestlers would like to have a word with you. |
|
