|
Post by darthobiwan on Oct 27, 2010 6:19:48 GMT -5
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s). This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once. next one is... Vince Mcmahon ***results so far *Yes superstar billy graham- 19-0 kane- 25-1 iron sheik- 21-1 andre the giant- 19-1 buddy rogers- 15-1 ultimate warrior- 21-3 mick foley- 20-3 yokozuna- 16-7 sid- 15-8 antonio inoki- 8-7 *No stan stasiak- 9-4 sgt. slaughter- 13-11 *undecided ivan koloff- 4-4
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 27, 2010 8:03:33 GMT -5
On paper, no. He was around 60 years old and was a non-wrestler. However, I am not bothered at all by his fluke win, because he was such a strong heel character and presence in the WWE during the Attitude Era that it somehow justifies him winning it. The ECW Championship was excessive, but for some reason I am okay with him winning the WWE Champion because of how over he was at the time, even if it was as a non-wrestler.
|
|
The Possum
Unicron
JBL stands for "Just Beat a Lizard".
Posts: 3,013
|
Post by The Possum on Oct 27, 2010 11:07:56 GMT -5
Nahhhh, but it didn't bother me. Especially because he won the belt in a flukey way, never defended it, and forfeited it. No wrestlers ever looked bad at the expense of Vince having the belt. It didn't bother me at all.
|
|
|
Post by Junkenstein on Oct 27, 2010 11:51:34 GMT -5
No. Firstly, I just plain don't like angles where authority figures win world titles. Also, I like Vince, but only in small doses. It seemed that Vince was all over the product in 1999, and his whole feud with Triple H where he won the title was lame IMO.
|
|
fw91
Patti Mayonnaise
FAN Idol All-Star: FAN Idol Season X and *Gavel* 2x Judges' Throwdown winner
Tribe has spoken for 2024 Mets
Posts: 39,085
|
Post by fw91 on Oct 27, 2010 12:00:51 GMT -5
no, it didnt bother me, but it was pointless in retrospect
|
|
Gus Richlen Was Wrong
Patti Mayonnaise
Metal Maestro: Co-winner of the FAN Idol Throwdown!
Fun while it lasted
Posts: 38,519
|
Post by Gus Richlen Was Wrong on Oct 27, 2010 13:41:51 GMT -5
yes.
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Oct 27, 2010 14:25:13 GMT -5
No
|
|
Malibu Albino
Hank Scorpio
Remember the dog legs
Posts: 6,530
Member is Online
|
Post by Malibu Albino on Oct 27, 2010 15:31:09 GMT -5
No he didn't deserve it but I didn't mind his short title run.
|
|
|
Post by the5thhorseman on Oct 27, 2010 17:43:17 GMT -5
Didnt bother me but no didnt deserve it
|
|
Incognito
ALF
Putting the fun back in funeral
Posts: 1,024
|
Post by Incognito on Oct 27, 2010 17:51:57 GMT -5
A weak no.
As stated, no wrestlers were buried by him, it was a fluke and he was very hated by the crowd so in a way it didn't hurt anything, but I still prefer that a wrestler wrestles for the gold.
I like it when the belt is made to look like it's hard to win it.
|
|