|
Post by Chris the Bambikiller on Jun 9, 2010 5:46:09 GMT -5
Vince, is that you?
|
|
|
Post by Jimichiro Likes Erick Rowan on Jun 9, 2010 8:10:12 GMT -5
You're the man, Brad.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Jun 9, 2010 8:27:04 GMT -5
I wish it was the reverse we could call it "Whatever happened to Baby Kane?"
|
|
|
Post by therealmamamiller on Jun 9, 2010 11:32:54 GMT -5
I just realized that the only way this is going to end is with the power of the urn and Paul Bearer...think about it.....
|
|
Mr Captain Falcon
Dennis Stamp
So I could write anything in here and it'll be posted?
Posts: 4,689
|
Post by Mr Captain Falcon on Jun 9, 2010 12:47:24 GMT -5
This is to Brad.
|
|
|
Post by bradtherad on Jun 9, 2010 12:48:29 GMT -5
I've never seen that before! (this is sarcasm(
|
|
Jonathan Michaels
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Archduke of Levity
Here since TNA was still kinda okay
Posts: 18,184
|
Post by Jonathan Michaels on Jun 9, 2010 13:10:29 GMT -5
That's how it could have happened . . .
But Here's what really happened.
Kane IS the attacker, Undertaker returns at Survivor Series, wins the WHC, Kane FINALLY wins the Rumble and fights Taker one last time at Wrestlemania, and win or lose both men can retire on a high note.
|
|
|
Post by bradtherad on Jun 9, 2010 13:26:36 GMT -5
That's how it could have happened . . . But Here's what really happened. Kane IS the attacker, Undertaker returns at Survivor Series, wins the WHC, Kane FINALLY wins the Rumble and fights Taker one last time at Wrestlemania, and win or lose both men can retire on a high note. Taker aint retiring for at least the next 2 years and Kane will prolly be around for like 5-10 more, so I dont see this happening sorry
|
|
Viva
Dennis Stamp
THAT'S MY PURSE! *kick to the groin*
You can dance if you want to.
Posts: 4,099
|
Post by Viva on Jun 9, 2010 15:31:36 GMT -5
That's how it could have happened . . . But Here's what really happened. Kane IS the attacker, Undertaker returns at Survivor Series, wins the WHC, Kane FINALLY wins the Rumble and fights Taker one last time at Wrestlemania, and win or lose both men can retire on a high note. Taker aint retiring for at least the next 2 years and Kane will prolly be around for like 5-10 more, so I dont see this happening sorryHow do you know?
|
|
|
Post by bradtherad on Jun 9, 2010 15:39:37 GMT -5
Taker aint retiring for at least the next 2 years and Kane will prolly be around for like 5-10 more, so I dont see this happening sorry How do you know? I just cant see Taker retiring until he goes 20-0 and faces John Cena at Mania I mean it has to happen this year im pretty sure he will face HHH or something.
As for Kane, Kane is younger than Taker and Kane still has a lot to do and he isnt banged up or beat up like Taker so why would he leave a $$$$$ job just to sit at home and pick his nose?
|
|
noah9322
Trap-Jaw
Titletown, USA.
Posts: 489
|
Post by noah9322 on Jun 9, 2010 15:42:55 GMT -5
I just cant see Taker retiring until he goes 20-0 and faces John Cena at Mania I mean it has to happen this year im pretty sure he will face HHH or something.
As for Kane, Kane is younger than Taker and Kane still has a lot to do and he isnt banged up or beat up like Taker so why would he leave a $$$$$ job just to sit at home and pick his nose?
Kane has a load of injuries over his career. I also heard somewhere that he has been considering retirement in a couple of years. Kane has 5 at best.
|
|
|
Post by The Peoples Elbow on Jun 10, 2010 10:42:05 GMT -5
Good lord, what a clusterf***.
1:10 and on is for you, Brad.
|
|
hargh
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 3,840
|
Post by hargh on Jun 10, 2010 10:51:10 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2010 11:00:25 GMT -5
I wish it was the reverse we could call it "Whatever happened to Baby Kane?" No, this would be right... Blanche was the disabled sister, and Jane was the crazy one. Perfect!
|
|