|
Post by bradtherad on Jul 22, 2010 17:06:30 GMT -5
So, now that Rey Mysterios second title run came to a quick end which was really premature imo, what do u think was the better reign?
One one hand the first one was a huge surprise and finally moment and he won it in a great way. On the other hand a lot of people saw it as him being given the title because of eddie.
His second reign started off with a great win but he barely did anything before losing it. (He got beat up a lot backstage lol) A lot of people also say he got the title because of injuring Taker.
So which reign do u think was better?
I enjoyed his first reign more it was pretty good I dunno why people hated it so much. It was awesome to see. This second reign was just too short imo.
I hope WWE gives Rey a third reign that will last 6 months.
What do u think?
|
|
|
Post by Predator McBroski on Jul 22, 2010 17:09:09 GMT -5
the one where he didnt have one
|
|
Mangs
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 282
|
Post by Mangs on Jul 22, 2010 20:15:24 GMT -5
I don't like either of them, but if I have to pick the best of the worst, I'm going to have to say the second one.
The first one only happened because of the death of Eddie Guerrero, it was more about Eddie then it was about Rey.
|
|