biafra
El Dandy
Biafra Who?
Posts: 7,617
|
Post by biafra on Jan 1, 2011 11:50:29 GMT -5
If you already have copies of all of them?
Is the sound quality improved enough to justify buying them over?
|
|
beatlefreak909
AC Slater
Whatcha gonna do when Jamesamania run wild on you!
Posts: 104
|
Post by beatlefreak909 on Jan 1, 2011 12:25:47 GMT -5
Yes. They blow the original 1987 CDs out of the water.
|
|
biafra
El Dandy
Biafra Who?
Posts: 7,617
|
Post by biafra on Jan 1, 2011 12:28:43 GMT -5
Yes. They blow the original 1987 CDs out of the water. Sweet. I've been reading some online reviews and I'm really excited to start updating my collection. |
|
|
|
Post by ani on Jan 1, 2011 13:20:57 GMT -5
No doubt. The 1987 CD's were the shit (and not the good shit.) ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by necktiechokehold on Jan 1, 2011 14:05:54 GMT -5
Yeah, I have the stereo box set, it's excellent, I did a comparison and the difference, though subtle, is impressive!
|
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Jan 1, 2011 14:07:32 GMT -5
I was lucky enough to wind up with both sets; the Stereo remaster is a must for anybody's IPod, and listening to the Mono set on surround sound is like a religious experience.
|
|
Phosphor Glow
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Is a real girl!
Posts: 19,870 
|
Post by Phosphor Glow on Jan 1, 2011 14:43:45 GMT -5
Dear sweet lord, yes. If you consider yourself a fan of The Beatles, there's absolutely no reason not to get them. They're vastly improved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Bendtner on Jan 1, 2011 14:50:27 GMT -5
Yes, they are incredibly worth it. Audiophile like myself; listening to the mono and stereo versions is just a ridiculously enjoyable experience, particularly with their later albums.
|
|
