Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2010 11:02:53 GMT -5
I can compare the two, in terms of general booking as this sentence:
Lame vs. retarded.
|
|
|
Post by treysarver on Dec 15, 2010 15:07:44 GMT -5
TNA used to be so good too, damn shame. As far as the thread goes, I'll play along.
WWE has SSE, TNA does not.
|
|
|
Post by N E O G E O B O Y S on Dec 15, 2010 15:21:08 GMT -5
WWE booking - "What's a Midcard?" TNA booking - "What's a clean Main Event finish?" This is actually the most coherent and acurrate comment in this thread
|
|
|
Post by waluigi on Dec 15, 2010 19:59:41 GMT -5
I will paraphrase one Lewis Black. "WWE is a company of no ideas, while TNA is a company of bad ideas" Basically...
|
|
percymania
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Percymania will live forever! Oh yeah!
Posts: 17,296
|
Post by percymania on Dec 15, 2010 20:02:18 GMT -5
WWE ignores the smarks while TNA is run by them.
|
|
|
Post by Indifference Abounds on Dec 15, 2010 20:24:13 GMT -5
In WWE, you build up storylines which culminate in pointless gimmick-matches; in TNA, you build up storylines with pointless gimmick-matches.
|
|
|
Post by waluigi on Dec 15, 2010 20:24:27 GMT -5
WWE ignores the smarks while TNA is run by them. I don't think the average smark would ask for Jersey Shore characters or something as dumb as Suicide.
|
|
percymania
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Percymania will live forever! Oh yeah!
Posts: 17,296
|
Post by percymania on Dec 16, 2010 3:19:26 GMT -5
WWE ignores the smarks while TNA is run by them. I don't think the average smark would ask for Jersey Shore characters or something as dumb as Suicide. Come on man. It's just a silly generalization that in no way should be taken as a serious assessment.
|
|