|
|
Post by normansmiley on Apr 3, 2012 22:49:10 GMT -5
Yep, just like I figured - they're going to kill Bryan's "YES!" gimmick to try and force the fans to hate him by taking away something they love and that got over. God, WWE loves flushing money down the toilet. Exactly. The night after too. Unbelievable. |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 3, 2012 22:49:26 GMT -5
Yep, just like I figured - they're going to kill Bryan's "YES!" gimmick to try and force the fans to hate him by taking away something they love and that got over. God, WWE loves flushing money down the toilet. Tell me about it. Hell...even if the "yes" chants stick around, WWE will just as much try to tie it to someone else over Bryan. Oh and I don't know if we're going to get that "Yes" shirt now since he basically is shunning the yes's. |
|
Death by Pickles!
Don Corleone
R.I.P. Derek Boogaard (1982-2011). Long Live the Boogey Man.
Posts: 1,314
|
Post by Death by Pickles! on Apr 3, 2012 22:49:52 GMT -5
Yep, just like I figured - they're going to kill Bryan's "YES!" gimmick to try and force the fans to hate him by taking away something they love and that got over. God, WWE loves flushing money down the toilet. God, the Internet just lives to overreact to every single thing. Newsflash, he's still a heel. Did you really think he would go face overnight? Jesus, it's barely been a week. You have no idea how this is gonna end. This is what you all did when he first won the title, give it more than one set of spoilers before you start screaming RUINED 4EVER  ((((. You're all gonna hate him in two months anyway. |
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Apr 3, 2012 22:58:02 GMT -5
Yep, just like I figured - they're going to kill Bryan's "YES!" gimmick to try and force the fans to hate him by taking away something they love and that got over. God, WWE loves flushing money down the toilet. God, the Internet just lives to overreact to every single thing. Newsflash, he's still a heel. Did you really think he would go face overnight? Jesus, it's barely been a week. You have no idea how this is gonna end. This is what you all did when he first won the title, give it more than one set of spoilers before you start screaming RUINED 4EVER ((((. You're all gonna hate him in two months anyway. Who the hell are the "you're all" you refer to? I have a MIND OF MY OWN, and I'll like and dislike who I damn well please. Secondly, I never said I expected or wanted him to go face, or that he was "RUINED 4EVER", which I assume was your way of mocking me like I'm some internet geek like the losers who post angry and poorly spelled rants on YouTube. Well I'm not, so you just came off as a jerk. Congratulations. Bottom line here is that the spoilers clearly indicate that WWE is trying to kill the "YES!" thing because it wasn't in their plans for it to get over. They did the same thing to Armando Alejandro Estrada when they ditched his middle name and had him stop introducing himself because it got over. They had Christian go out and claim to hate his "Peeps" because no one wanted to boo him. They had Kurt Angle claim to hate black people and want to beat up Jesus, all because fans cheering him wasn't in their plans. I have all the basis needed to assume they're going to do this with Bryan. |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 3, 2012 23:01:25 GMT -5
I like those people who defend WWE through thick and f***ing thin. No matter what. When we see a missed opportunity and call WWE out on it, they'll be the first to say "how do you know where this is going!?"
Well I don't...but I have a good f***ing idea. Because this is what WWE does. They f*** things up.
And you're the same people who said "wait and see" for things like Christian's World title run and Nexxus...yes...let's just wait and see them f*** this up as well.
|
|
CH Punk
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Advice: Noted
Stuck in the Retro Zone
Posts: 15,570
|
Post by CH Punk on Apr 3, 2012 23:01:59 GMT -5
God, the Internet just lives to overreact to every single thing. Newsflash, he's still a heel. Did you really think he would go face overnight? Jesus, it's barely been a week. You have no idea how this is gonna end. This is what you all did when he first won the title, give it more than one set of spoilers before you start screaming RUINED 4EVER ((((. You're all gonna hate him in two months anyway. Who the hell are the "you're all" you refer to? I have a MIND OF MY OWN, and I'll like and dislike who I damn well please. Secondly, I never said I expected or wanted him to go face, or that he was "RUINED 4EVER", which I assume was your way of mocking me like I'm some internet geek like the losers who post angry and poorly spelled rants on YouTube. Well I'm not, so you just came off as a jerk. Congratulations. Bottom line here is that the spoilers clearly indicate that WWE is trying to kill the "YES!" thing because it wasn't in their plans for it to get over. They did the same thing to Armando Alejandro Estrada when they ditched his middle name and had him stop introducing himself because it got over. They had Christian go out and claim to hate his "Peeps" because no one wanted to boo him. They had Kurt Angle claim to hate black people and want to beat up Jesus, all because fans cheering him wasn't in their plans. I have all the basis needed to assume they're going to do this with Bryan. Although, to play devil's advocate, Kurt cut that promo to cheers from the crowd and it was, more or less, a tongue in cheek promo about how the fans will continue to cheer for him despite what he does or says. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2012 23:02:58 GMT -5
Who the hell are the "you're all" you refer to? I have a MIND OF MY OWN, and I'll like and dislike who I damn well please. Secondly, I never said I expected or wanted him to go face, or that he was "RUINED 4EVER", which I assume was your way of mocking me like I'm some internet geek like the losers who post angry and poorly spelled rants on YouTube. Well I'm not, so you just came off as a jerk. Congratulations. Bottom line here is that the spoilers clearly indicate that WWE is trying to kill the "YES!" thing because it wasn't in their plans for it to get over. They did the same thing to Armando Alejandro Estrada when they ditched his middle name and had him stop introducing himself because it got over. They had Christian go out and claim to hate his "Peeps" because no one wanted to boo him. They had Kurt Angle claim to hate black people and want to beat up Jesus, all because fans cheering him wasn't in their plans. I have all the basis needed to assume they're going to do this with Bryan. Although, to play devil's advocate, Kurt cut that promo to cheers from the crowd and it was, more or less, a tongue in cheek promo about how the fans will continue to cheer for him despite what he does or says. True. And he wound up turning face two days later anyway. Still, the rest stands. |
|
|
|
Post by ecabney on Apr 3, 2012 23:03:07 GMT -5
Yep, just like I figured - they're going to kill Bryan's "YES!" gimmick to try and force the fans to hate him by taking away something they love and that got over. God, WWE loves flushing money down the toilet. Tell me about it. Hell...even if the "yes" chants stick around, WWE will just as much try to tie it to someone else over Bryan. Oh and I don't know if we're going to get that "Yes" shirt now since he basically is shunning the yes's. he has nothing to YES! about... |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 3, 2012 23:08:36 GMT -5
he hsa nothing to YES! about... Then he shouldn't even acknowledge it. WWE clearly want the fans to stop yessing him, so they pull out "generic heel comment #327", which says "Even though you cheer me, I think you suck". WWE are just so f***ing desperate to do things just how they planned it out, that it shows how weak willed their writing staff is. |
|
Death by Pickles!
Don Corleone
R.I.P. Derek Boogaard (1982-2011). Long Live the Boogey Man.
Posts: 1,314
|
Post by Death by Pickles! on Apr 3, 2012 23:12:21 GMT -5
I like those people who defend WWE through thick and f***ing thin. No matter what. When we see a missed opportunity and call WWE out on it, they'll be the first to say "how do you know where this is going!?" Well I don't...but I have a good f***ing idea. Because this is what WWE does. They f*** things up. And you're the same people who said "wait and see" for things like Christian's World title run and Nexxus...yes...let's just wait and see them f*** this up as well. When the f*** do I ever defend the WWE "through thick and thin"? They do stupid s*** and I don't excuse it. I hated Kane/Cena, I hated Bryan getting squashed, I hated the HHH takeover of the Punk feud, I hated what they did to Nexus and Christian, so where are you coming from? Get the f*** out of with with that garbage. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2012 23:13:39 GMT -5
Should probably scale things back a bit here. I think things are starting to get a bit too heated and might not hurt to do so before there's any proper mod intervention or anything.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 3, 2012 23:15:13 GMT -5
When the f*** do I ever defend the WWE "through thick and thin"? They do stupid s*** and I don't excuse it. I hated Kane/Cena, I hated Bryan getting squashed, I hated the HHH takeover of the Punk feud, I hated what they did to Nexus and Christian, so where are you coming from? Get the f*** out of with with that garbage. You used the argument "you don't know where this is going" as if to say...they're going to endorse the damn thing. You might think I'm overreacting...but I've seen this s*** time and time and time and time and time again...so why the f*** should I give them the benefit of the doubt? Should probably scale things back a bit here. I think things are starting to get a bit too heated and might not hurt to do so before there's any proper mod intervention or anything. For the record, I'm not offended by anything said, nor did I take his post as threatening or personal...yeah, we're both a little heated...but I don't think it's at one another. But I'll cut back. |
|
CH Punk
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Advice: Noted
Stuck in the Retro Zone
Posts: 15,570
|
Post by CH Punk on Apr 3, 2012 23:20:33 GMT -5
Although, to play devil's advocate, Kurt cut that promo to cheers from the crowd and it was, more or less, a tongue in cheek promo about how the fans will continue to cheer for him despite what he does or says. True. And he wound up turning face two days later anyway. Still, the rest stands. The rest is 100% accurate and having Austin become the most evil man that ever lived just to make sure that no one would cheer for him could be added to that list. And, while WWE seems to be doing everything they can to kill the YES! chants, I do question why Bryan brought up that they were mocking him by doing so because the "Smarks", who started the chant, will do it regardless of what WWE tells them to do and, if the heel says that a chant gets on his nerves, wouldn't "Marks" want to do it just to annoy him? |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 3, 2012 23:24:12 GMT -5
And, while WWE seems to be doing everything they can to kill the YES! chants, I do question why Bryan brought up that they were mocking him by doing so because the "Smarks", who started the chant, will do it regardless of what WWE tells them to do and, if the heel says that a chant gets on his nerves, wouldn't "Marks" want to do it just to annoy him? That's why I find WWE hilarious. They seriously think they can control the crowd. Which I suppose they can in editing. Still, they're only lying to themselves. I'm looking at you Hogan/Sid at RR'92! |
|
|
|
Post by Rolent Tex on Apr 3, 2012 23:57:21 GMT -5
WWE should just save themselves some trouble and market the "Yes!" shirt now and let Bryan continue doing it whenever he finds another reason to celebrate. Otherwise, I look forward to some smartass fans chanting "YES!" at the top of their lungs during a major match like Lesnar/Cena.
|
|
|
|
Post by rnrk supports BLM on Apr 3, 2012 23:57:29 GMT -5
And, while WWE seems to be doing everything they can to kill the YES! chants, I do question why Bryan brought up that they were mocking him by doing so because the "Smarks", who started the chant, will do it regardless of what WWE tells them to do and, if the heel says that a chant gets on his nerves, wouldn't "Marks" want to do it just to annoy him? That's the idea. WWE knows they can't kill the "YES!" chants, so they're coming up with a kayfabe excuse for them. Now the little Jimmies who hear "YES!" chants during Daniel Bryan segments will think it's a way to mock that dastardly heel, not something based on pushes or match quality or other non-kayfabe stuff that they don't know or care about. Bryan will go through his little act of being mad when people chant "YES!" at him, the smarks will do it anyway because they know Bryan and WWE know what it really means, and the marks will go along with it because they think they're showing the heel how much he sucks. And believe me, I'll be surprised if WWE doesn't make a "YES!" t-shirt. |
|
paywindah
Dennis Stamp
He's goin' to da paywindah here on da muddaship TBS.
Posts: 3,678 
|
Post by paywindah on Apr 3, 2012 23:58:53 GMT -5
I really hope SD ratings plummet without DB being a focus. I want low, Orton-as-champ numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Timmy8271 on Apr 4, 2012 0:07:25 GMT -5
I was at the show. Daniel said he has a rematch with Sheamus coming up. I'm guessing it will be at a SD or maybe a 3 way at Extreme Rules. Sheamus/Del Rio was awfully boring till the end. Poor Chad Patton got killed by the kick.
Best match of the night was on Superstars or the 8 man dark match tag with Cena. Everyone was doing the YES! Chants. Even Orton.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Apr 4, 2012 0:08:10 GMT -5
And, while WWE seems to be doing everything they can to kill the YES! chants, I do question why Bryan brought up that they were mocking him by doing so because the "Smarks", who started the chant, will do it regardless of what WWE tells them to do and, if the heel says that a chant gets on his nerves, wouldn't "Marks" want to do it just to annoy him? That's the idea. WWE knows they can't kill the "YES!" chants, so they're coming up with a kayfabe excuse for them. Now the little Jimmies who hear "YES!" chants during Daniel Bryan segments will think it's a way to mock that dastardly heel, not something based on pushes or match quality or other non-kayfabe stuff that they don't know or care about. Bryan will go through his little act of being mad when people chant "YES!" at him, the smarks will do it anyway because they know Bryan and WWE know what it really means, and the marks will go along with it because they think they're showing the heel how much he sucks. Sadly, that sounds about right. I wish they would FOR ONCE not beat around the bush and just be f***ing honest with their audience, especially since their audience is being honest with them. |
|
CH Punk
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Advice: Noted
Stuck in the Retro Zone
Posts: 15,570
|
Post by CH Punk on Apr 4, 2012 0:13:57 GMT -5
That's the idea. WWE knows they can't kill the "YES!" chants, so they're coming up with a kayfabe excuse for them. Now the little Jimmies who hear "YES!" chants during Daniel Bryan segments will think it's a way to mock that dastardly heel, not something based on pushes or match quality or other non-kayfabe stuff that they don't know or care about. Bryan will go through his little act of being mad when people chant "YES!" at him, the smarks will do it anyway because they know Bryan and WWE know what it really means, and the marks will go along with it because they think they're showing the heel how much he sucks. Sadly, that sounds about right. I wish they would FOR ONCE not beat around the bush and just be f***ing honest with their honest, especially since their audience is being honest with them. At least it's better than them going "Don't chant Yes!, please don't chant Yes!" |
|
((((.
