If Vince hired back Russo and Ferrera

[foreveryoung]

Do you think WWE's programming would change for the better and increase viewership along with compelling tv in terms of a better ME scene and midcard?

[Krimzon]

To be brief, no.

[MrBRulzOK]

Oct 14, 2011 16:20:40 GMT -5 Krimzon said:

To be brief, no.

[cool guy]

Oct 14, 2011 16:20:40 GMT -5 Krimzon said:

To be brief, no.

[Kash Flagg]

I think that may be the thing that makes me stop watching. I only check out brief clips of TNA now.

[DavidArquette]

Their booking worked in the Attitude era but I really don't think it would work now. It's been over 10 years since they were consistently writing great angles and they've proved many times that they can't do that again.

[rnrk supports BLM]

As long as they're restricted to staying within the barriers of the PG rating, I don't think they'd deliver anything that's worse than the current product.

As things stand, the WWE product needs a massive shakeup if it ever wants to regain any sort of pop cultural relevance or interest from casual viewers (and no, pandering the diehard fanbase by pushing CM Punk and his "shoot" comments was, if anything, retreating even further into a pit of insularity). ANY sweeping change, even one that has the potential to backfire disastrously, would be for the best at this point.

[Beets by Schrute]

(LANGUAGE WARNING)

[thekingofoldschool]

Oct 14, 2011 16:20:40 GMT -5 Krimzon said:

To be brief, no.

to be long,

HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[moneyman20]

F*** Russo and Ferrera.

That is all.

[Madagascar Fred]

^^ this

[jadison]

Oct 14, 2011 16:35:09 GMT -5 rnrk supports BLM said:

As long as they're restricted to staying within the barriers of the PG rating, I don't think they'd deliver anything that's worse than the current product.

As things stand, the WWE product needs a massive shakeup if it ever wants to regain any sort of pop cultural relevance or interest from casual viewers (and no, pandering the diehard fanbase by pushing CM Punk and his "shoot" comments was, if anything, retreating even further into a pit of insularity). ANY sweeping change, even one that has the potential to backfire disastrously, would be for the best at this point.

Thats very easy to say when its not your entire life's work and all of your money invested into the company. Vince is 66 years old...I'd say he wants to live comfortably and enjoy himself until he passes on. They have no competition, why take a chance that could "disastrously backfire"?

[zeez]

The viewership would drop because at least half of them would kill themselves.

[Lardlad]

I'd want Keller to do an extra volume or two of his Ultimate Insiders series with them. Those DVDs were great....

[femmejomo]

Oct 14, 2011 17:05:10 GMT -5 Beets by Schrute said:

(LANGUAGE WARNING)

^^^ This.