|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Mar 31, 2013 16:36:14 GMT -5
Wait they seriously released The Host in theatres this weekend? Really?
It is a great film and all, but who would pay to see it now when it has been on Netflix for years now?
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Mar 31, 2013 16:46:30 GMT -5
Wait they seriously released The Host in theatres this weekend? Really? It is a great film and all, but who would pay to see it now when it has been on Netflix for years now? The Stephanie Meyers movie, not the horror film.
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Mar 31, 2013 16:56:38 GMT -5
Wait they seriously released The Host in theatres this weekend? Really? It is a great film and all, but who would pay to see it now when it has been on Netflix for years now? The Stephanie Meyers movie, not the horror film. Then why is it listed as The Host (2006)?
|
|
|
Post by John Cena's Boner on Mar 31, 2013 16:58:21 GMT -5
The Stephanie Meyers movie, not the horror film. Then why is it listed as The Host (2006)? That's just a f***-up on their part.
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Mar 31, 2013 17:48:22 GMT -5
Wait they seriously released The Host in theatres this weekend? Really? It is a great film and all, but who would pay to see it now when it has been on Netflix for years now? The Stephanie Meyers movie, not the horror film. In any event, I'm glad it hasn't caught fire like the other films based on Meyer's other book franchise.
|
|
Welfare Willis
Crow T. Robot
Pornomancer 555-BONE FDIC Bonsured
Game Center CX Kacho on!
Posts: 44,259
|
Post by Welfare Willis on Mar 31, 2013 18:15:38 GMT -5
Then why is it listed as The Host (2006)? That's just a f***-up on their part. I don't know if my rage can handle a Stephanie Meyer Remake of the Korean film. Damn monster would fall in love with the teenage girl. Also the monster is inside a good looking teenaged boy.
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Apr 4, 2013 23:00:07 GMT -5
I also think that is low for JP3D.
I hope Evil Dead meets or passes that forecast. Film looks awesome and we need to show Hollywood that practical effects horror films can still draw, so they can stop using cheapass CGI instead of practical effects.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2013 15:24:24 GMT -5
1 N Evil Dead (2013) TriS $26,000,000 - 3,025 - $8,595 $26,000,000 $17 1 T2 1 G.I. Joe: Retaliation Par. $21,100,000 -47.9% 3,734 +15 $5,651 $86,663,000 $130 2 T2 2 The Croods Fox $21,100,000 -21.0% 3,879 -186 $5,440 $125,800,000 $135 3 4 N Jurassic Park 3D Uni. $18,247,000 - 2,771 - $6,585 $18,247,000 $10 1 5 4 Olympus Has Fallen FD $10,042,000 -29.0% 3,059 -47 $3,283 $71,116,000 $70 3
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Apr 7, 2013 18:55:55 GMT -5
Evil Dead is not only the number 1 movie, but it also is really close to breaking the profit barrier on it's first weekend.
Not bad, Raimi, not bad.
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Apr 14, 2013 15:31:18 GMT -5
1 42 (2013) $27.2M $27.2M 1 2 Scary Movie 5 (2013) $15.2M $15.2M 13 The Croods (2013) $13.2M $143M 4 4 G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013) $10.8M $102M 3 5 Evil Dead (2013) $9.5M $41.5M 2 6 Jurassic Park (1993) $8.82M $383M 2 7 Olympus Has Fallen (2013) $7.28M $81.9M 4 8 Oz the Great and Powerful (2013) $4.92M $219M 6 9 Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor (2013) $4.5M $45.4M 3 10 The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) $4.08M $5.45M 3
|
|
stealthamo
King Koopa
Something stupid
#AJAll
Posts: 11,247
|
Post by stealthamo on Apr 14, 2013 15:37:22 GMT -5
1 42 (2013) $27.2M $27.2M 1 2 Scary Movie 5 (2013) $15.2M $15.2M 13 The Croods (2013) $13.2M $143M 4 4 G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013) $10.8M $102M 3 5 Evil Dead (2013) $9.5M $41.5M 2 6 Jurassic Park (1993) $8.82M $383M 2 7 Olympus Has Fallen (2013) $7.28M $81.9M 4 8 Oz the Great and Powerful (2013) $4.92M $219M 6 9 Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor (2013) $4.5M $45.4M 3 10 The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) $4.08M $5.45M 3 At least it did a bit worse than expected, while 42 (which I haven't seen, but I've heard is pretty good) did a lot better. People will always go to see those parody movies, but at least it's not as many as people thought.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Apr 14, 2013 16:49:42 GMT -5
At least it did a bit worse than expected, while 42 (which I haven't seen, but I've heard is pretty good) did a lot better. People will always go to see those parody movies, but at least it's not as many as people thought. Yeah. I was scared to death that America would make that abortion the number one movie in the country. Happy to see 42 come out on top.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Apr 18, 2013 21:30:52 GMT -5
Forecast (April 19-21) 1.Oblivion - $36.9 million 2. 42 - $20.4 million (-26%) 3. The Croods - $9 million (-31%) 4. G.I. Joe 2 - $6.4 million (-41%) 5. Place Beyond the Pines - $6.1 million -. Scary Movie 5 - $5.4 million (-62%) -. Evil Dead - $4.5 million (-53%) I saw Oblivion last week {Spoiler}{Spoiler}If you've seen Moon, you've already seen Oblivion
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on May 5, 2013 17:04:30 GMT -5
I knew it was going to go well... but crap that's a huge haul.
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on May 5, 2013 19:14:08 GMT -5
I'm interested to see how the post-Avengers Thor and Cap movies do. All three Iron Man movies have been huge hits, while those two were solid but not massive their first time out. Would less than $100 million for their first weekend be considered disappointing? And how insane is the franchise that that question can even be asked now?
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on May 5, 2013 20:29:15 GMT -5
Iron Man 3 did great because people, I think rightfully so, saw it more as a followup to a fantastic Avengers more than the mediocre IM2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 11:34:36 GMT -5
Iron Man 3 did great because people, I think rightfully so, saw it more as a followup to a fantastic Avengers more than the mediocre IM2. That helped. BTW, the film has already grossed $680M WORLDWIDE! And it's only been out for almost 2 weeks. So, it's looking strong that Disney might have it's SIXTH billion dollar movie in the near future. That's just f***ing crazy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 12:17:30 GMT -5
I'm interested to see how the post-Avengers Thor and Cap movies do. All three Iron Man movies have been huge hits, while those two were solid but not massive their first time out. Would less than $100 million for their first weekend be considered disappointing? And how insane is the franchise that that question can even be asked now? The THOR sequel will probably do just as well as the first, but I suspect CAP: WINTER SOLDIER will probably do better because it's current day and not a period piece (also, it has ScarJo).
|
|
BK From WV
Hank Scorpio
Claims to have sense of humor, probably stole it
I'm Here
Posts: 5,614
|
Post by BK From WV on May 9, 2013 20:35:08 GMT -5
I had to look and see what Peeples even was. I haven't seen a single ad for that movie so I was wondering how a movie I had never heard of was projected to make 14.2 million. Then I saw it was a Tyler Perry movie and that explains it. Those always do well at the box office it seems.
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 17,384
|
Post by BRV on May 12, 2013 15:19:36 GMT -5
That's too bad, I was really hoping "The Great Gatsby" would tank, because the last thing we need to do as a society is to encourage Baz Luhrmann.
|
|