what YEAR do you wish the wwe could be like ?

[KRUGkiller]

if you could choose that the wwe could be like any year from it's past , i guess forever or a very long time, what year would you want back ? with things to be just like that year in terms of how feuds, storylines, title changes, ect were done.

i would pick the year 2000.

[CATCH_US IS the Conversation]

2002. Brand Split with one World Champion, decent spread of midcard belts (before the mass unifications).

[Error]

Late 2002-2003. Two separate shows with great rosters basically acting as two separate companies until Mania and Survivor Series.

[WarChief]

Jul 21, 2012 15:18:45 GMT -5 CATCH_US IS the Conversation said:

2002. Brand Split with one World Champion, decent spread of midcard belts (before the mass unifications).

This, but I could also live with 2 world champions. Reinstate the split, but make both shows equal (or as equal as possible) in star power.

[Paco]

I'd be cool with 1997 or 2000.

[543Y2J]

Jul 21, 2012 15:23:02 GMT -5 Error said:

Late 2002-2003. Two separate shows with great rosters basically acting as two separate companies until Mania and Survivor Series.

Came here to post this

[CM Parish]

Can I combine 2002 Smackdown and 2000 Raw?

[Deleted]

A perfect mix of 2004 Raw and 2009 Smackdown.

[Gerard Gerard]

2012 and have the product reflect it consistently.

[thecrusherwi]

1991-92 A whole bunch of over the top kid-friendly cartoon characters in some very violent, evil, hardcore feuds. The production was professional but still had some grit to it. And the announcers treated it like a psuedo-sport. I would ditch modern Raw for the 1991-92 Prime Time Wrestling debate roundtable in a minute.

[MolotovMocktail]

2002, right before the brand split. An absolutely stacked roster with the right balance of titles, a still-alive tag division, and almost everyone playing an important role on TV.

[DavidArquette]

Mid - late 1997

[edgestar]

Jul 21, 2012 15:46:52 GMT -5 thecrusherwi said:

1991-92 A whole bunch of over the top kid-friendly cartoon characters in some very violent, evil, hardcore feuds. The production was professional but still had some grit to it. And the announcers treated it like a psuedo-sport. I would ditch modern Raw for the 1991-92 Prime Time Wrestling debate roundtable in a minute.

Agreed. 91-92 was pretty awesome.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2012 15:46:52 GMT -5 thecrusherwi said:

1991-92 A whole bunch of over the top kid-friendly cartoon characters in some very violent, evil, hardcore feuds. The production was professional but still had some grit to it. And the announcers treated it like a psuedo-sport. I would ditch modern Raw for the 1991-92 Prime Time Wrestling debate roundtable in a minute.

This. Good post.

I miss the way WWF/E used to present itself. Prime Time Wrestling was awesome. I liked how the show was Heenan and Monsoon at the desk and they'd bring up a match on their monitor and "zoom in" (which was just ordinary footage, but it felt much more like they were really hosting it).

They'd give a very brief intro and then let the match/segment sell itself. Then afterwards it'd go back to them and rather than run a bunch of filler video packages before cutting to the next match, Heenan and Monsoon would simply talk briefly about what just happened...then move on to the next thing.

[-Lithium-]

2000 or 97. If the show was like the second half of 1997, that'd be great...

[Steveweiser]

2002 and the SmackDown Six.

[Monkey Tennis?]

Jul 21, 2012 15:35:57 GMT -5 CM Parish said:

Can I combine 2002 Smackdown and 2000 Raw?

[GuyOfOwnage]

2000 right up through WM17. Both talent-wise and booking-wise, it's hard to top.

[Bravo Echo November]

Jul 21, 2012 16:57:57 GMT -5 GuyOfOwnage said:

2000 right up through WM17. Both talent-wise and booking-wise, it's hard to top.

[Bo Rida]

Jul 21, 2012 16:57:57 GMT -5 GuyOfOwnage said:

2000 right up through WM17. Both talent-wise and booking-wise, it's hard to top.

This, throw in the genuinely funny humour too (well E&C, Angle, Foley etc not Mae Young).