|
Post by Snaptastic on Jan 14, 2013 16:17:41 GMT -5
Another thing I noticed, "30 or more", I hope they never do another 40 man rumble again, it suck! The facts seem to be all over the place. I'm not buying this as gospel.
|
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 14, 2013 16:19:43 GMT -5
He could always win it from Punk or somebody else at Elimination Chamber, which Rock is already advertised for..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 16:20:59 GMT -5
As much as I think Punk's reign is tiring now, I'd rather have three more months of that than "Vanilla Fruity Pebble Cookie Puss vs. Poopy Smelling Rocket Shitting Toothy Boy Pt. 2"
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 14, 2013 16:23:08 GMT -5
He could always win it from Punk or somebody else at Elimination Chamber, which Rock is already advertised for.. Except this is being sent out as an advertising point for the Royal Rumble BLU-Ray and DVD by WWE based on the outcomes of Rock/Punk and the Royal Rumble Match at Royal Rumble.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 16:41:11 GMT -5
I rather have Punk keep the belt until next year and face Austin at Wrestlemania 30.
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Jan 14, 2013 16:50:00 GMT -5
I rather have Punk keep the belt until next year and face Austin at Wrestlemania 30. Oh yeah that's a way better alternative. Drop the belt to the guy that is also not on the roster and is more banged up than Rock.
|
|
|
Post by Urfarkendarf on Jan 14, 2013 16:52:58 GMT -5
Ten dollars says Punk wins the title match, someone other than Cena wins the Rumble and someone will still complain that WWE is predictable. I would praise the heavens and accept CM Punk as my saviour if they don't go with Cena vs Rock for the title. I am in extreme agreement with this. I WANT Rock to win the title at the Rumble, mind. I just really do not want Cena/Rock II for a couple of reasons. #1 I am going to Mania and I do not want to see Rock drop the title to Cena of all people espc since the only other Mania Ive been to is 2000 and the result of that main event still annoys me. It will be obvious to me this is happening if we get Cena/Rock II. Its obvious he'll be dropping it if he wins it, but give it to someone else. Would love to see Dolph get involved, but I dont think theres a chance. #2 We saw Cena/Rock last year. I think they could potentially do the build to a second match even better, but I just would rather see something else. #3 I don't want to see Cena win the Rumble. I'd rather see someone else get that opportunity. I personally want Daniel Bryan to win it.
|
|
|
Post by Big Kahuna Burger on Jan 14, 2013 17:08:25 GMT -5
I rather have Punk keep the belt until next year and face Austin at Wrestlemania 30. Let me guess, he goes over Austin and keeps the belt for a third year running? Wrestlemania 31 he main events with Colt Cabana?
|
|
|
Post by Savage Gambino on Jan 14, 2013 17:12:10 GMT -5
I rather have Punk keep the belt until next year and face Austin at Wrestlemania 30. Oh yeah that's a way better alternative. Drop the belt to the guy that is also not on the roster and is more banged up than Rock. No, I'm intrigued. I wanna see Punk believeably mow through a roster of wrestlers at the peak of their prime to get to a 50-year-old with a broken neck who hasn't been cleared for real competition in God knows how long. Well, not literally "see", since I would have long since stopped watching WWE if that were ever the case, because that sounds f***ing dire.
|
|
|
Post by BiloxiParish on Jan 14, 2013 17:16:59 GMT -5
Even if it does happen shouldn't Punk get a rematch, because of a rematch clause? I mean the guy has had the belt since 2011, he deserves about 5 rematches at this point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 17:22:13 GMT -5
So much for "once in a lifetime"
|
|
BorneAgain
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,472
Member is Online
|
Post by BorneAgain on Jan 14, 2013 17:25:46 GMT -5
Even if it does happen shouldn't Punk get a rematch, because of a rematch clause? I mean the guy has had the belt since 2011, he deserves about 5 rematches at this point. I would think a Punk/Rock rematch would occur at EC, but then that begs the question as to what Cena would be doing and what the Raw EC match would be. Only thing I can think of is Vickie deciding to be a jerk and making Cena defend his Mania title shot the other 5.
|
|
|
Post by mjolnir on Jan 14, 2013 17:33:28 GMT -5
Even if it does happen shouldn't Punk get a rematch, because of a rematch clause? I mean the guy has had the belt since 2011, he deserves about 5 rematches at this point. I would think a Punk/Rock rematch would occur at EC, but then that begs the question as to what Cena would be doing and what the Raw EC match would be. Only thing I can think of is Vickie deciding to be a jerk and making Cena defend his Mania title shot the other 5. Or for Dolph's MitB shot... ...Oh god, I just threw up a little in my mouth from typing that due to the absolute certainty that if that came to pass, he'd lose the shot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 17:39:07 GMT -5
A fitting end to a shitty title reign.
Dude needs to thank Rock because if Rocky wasn't coming back this year he would have dropped that title months ago.
|
|
BigBadZ
Grimlock
The Rumors Are All True
Posts: 13,923
|
Post by BigBadZ on Jan 14, 2013 17:47:09 GMT -5
it was spoiled even before this They spoiled the Rumble, in addition. I mean the Rumble was like 50% spoiled too, but that was pretty bad. IMO, they spoiled this at Raw 1000. I really hope they do something different but this is still WWE.... Rock beating Punk and leading to a rematch with Cena at Mania just seems like a safe WWE plan through and through, and they like those.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 17:50:09 GMT -5
I rather have Punk keep the belt until next year and face Austin at Wrestlemania 30. Let me guess, he goes over Austin and keeps the belt for a third year running? Wrestlemania 31 he main events with Colt Cabana? Nope....he lose it to Jamie Noble, who then lose it to Daniel Bryan 36 days later .
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 14, 2013 17:51:01 GMT -5
Maybe we get lucky and they have Cena pull the stupid move of using his Rumble win match at EC instead of Mania. Rock/Cena II at Mania and the EC is for the shot at Mania.
Not likely but I can hope.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Jan 14, 2013 17:53:35 GMT -5
It's pretty much been a given what would happen ever since Rock said he wanted to challenge for the title.
|
|
|
Post by joebob27 on Jan 14, 2013 17:58:17 GMT -5
They spoiled the Rumble, in addition. I mean the Rumble was like 50% spoiled too, but that was pretty bad. IMO, they spoiled this at Raw 1000. I really hope they do something different but this is still WWE.... Rock beating Punk and leading to a rematch with Cena at Mania just seems like a safe WWE plan through and through, and they like those. Yeah, but there were other outs to getting there. This is pretty WCW-ish. If it costs them even 10 buys, it was stupid. Spoiling the Rumble itself is just idiotic.
|
|
|
Post by Big Kahuna Burger on Jan 14, 2013 18:04:22 GMT -5
A fitting end to a s***ty title reign. Dude needs to thank Rock because if Rocky wasn't coming back this year he would have dropped that title months ago. Harsh but fair.
|
|