andrew8798
FANatic
on 24/7 this month
Posts: 106,084
|
Post by andrew8798 on Jan 16, 2013 12:30:18 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2013 12:34:53 GMT -5
The only thing that stopped me was really the fact the first wasn't on the 360. Going into a sequel on a new console always bugs me because I feel I'm missing out on the original
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Jan 16, 2013 12:49:35 GMT -5
Good. This game threw away what made the first game unique and made it another generic licensed platformer.
|
|
8.2.11/SAVIOR_NEZ
Don Corleone
Michael Nesmith, inventor of all you hold dear!
Posts: 1,534
|
Post by 8.2.11/SAVIOR_NEZ on Jan 16, 2013 17:04:44 GMT -5
It wasn't a bad game, but it felt really short compared to the first one. The co-op was fun and seemed to work well. I got the Wii version, which unless you have a Move setup for PS3, it was the best version. The game was really meant for motion controls, which apparently player one can never do on the Wii U (they always use the tablet, even in co-op).
|
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,379
|
Post by The Ichi on Jan 16, 2013 17:46:34 GMT -5
The only thing that stopped me was really the fact the first wasn't on the 360. Going into a sequel on a new console always bugs me because I feel I'm missing out on the original Same reason I didn't get it (I only have a 360 now since my Wii broke).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2013 18:37:31 GMT -5
Not really too surprising. I didn't even particularly like the first one, thought it was pretty disappointing.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Jan 16, 2013 21:54:14 GMT -5
As bad/disappointing as the first one was, it doesn't surprise me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2013 22:02:53 GMT -5
It's a kids game based on a bad franchise. I'm amazed it sold that well.
|
|
|
Post by Father Dougal McGuire on Jan 17, 2013 2:35:48 GMT -5
I have no idea how much it cost to make the game. but the $13.5 million, assuming the game sold for $50, seems to be a success.
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Jan 17, 2013 3:10:26 GMT -5
I have no idea how much it cost to make the game. but the $13.5 million, assuming the game sold for $50, seems to be a success. It was sold on 4 different platforms. That means it is an utter bomb.
|
|
Sin Cara Tres
Don Corleone
Funkasaurus Designs Incorporated
We Are Many. You Are One.
Posts: 1,631
|
Post by Sin Cara Tres on Jan 17, 2013 4:05:59 GMT -5
It's a kids game based on a bad franchise. I'm amazed it sold that well. Bad franchise? There was only one other game and the reviews were decent. Unless you're calling Mickey Mouse a bad franchise. I'd like to suggest you are the devil.
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Jan 17, 2013 8:07:09 GMT -5
It's a kids game based on a bad franchise. I'm amazed it sold that well. Bad franchise? There was only one other game and the reviews were decent. Unless you're calling Mickey Mouse a bad franchise. I'd like to suggest you are the devil. Actually there are two other games in the Epic Mickey series, the first one and a 3DS game subtitled the Power of Illusion released in 2012 as well.
|
|