Post by Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! on Jan 27, 2013 12:12:43 GMT -5
I was just thinking about this the other day. common knowledge talks about how this angle ruined Kane's credibility for some time, but the more I thought about it, the more I thought "y;know, Triple H didn't exactly come out of it smelling like a rose either" and then I thought "maybe the angle actually did more to hurt him than it did Kane". here's the evidence.
the case for Kane: had to live with the embarassment of being accused of necrophilia, was most definitely made to look like crap because Triple H won every match that mattered, was never officially cleared of any wrong-doing.
the case for Triple H: he's the one that actually made the accusation which made him sound both stupid and crazy, the angle got the wrong kind of heat, at the end of the day he's the one who had to mock-violate a corpse, this angle definitely contributed to the "Triple H never puts anyone over and always makes his opponents look stupid" stigma he's never been able to wash away.
so what do you guys think?
the case for Kane: had to live with the embarassment of being accused of necrophilia, was most definitely made to look like crap because Triple H won every match that mattered, was never officially cleared of any wrong-doing.
the case for Triple H: he's the one that actually made the accusation which made him sound both stupid and crazy, the angle got the wrong kind of heat, at the end of the day he's the one who had to mock-violate a corpse, this angle definitely contributed to the "Triple H never puts anyone over and always makes his opponents look stupid" stigma he's never been able to wash away.
so what do you guys think?
