Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2013 23:33:21 GMT -5
If they had backed off, it would have made it more obvious that they've aligned with Punk. By costing him the title initially by attacking Rock in the dark, it makes more sense to continue this supposed non-allegiance to Punk
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2013 23:34:20 GMT -5
I'm hoping that instead, it was Cena doing it. Like I said in the Rumble thread, that's require a willingness to take chances that WWE doesn't have, but it'd make perfect sense given he has reasons to want to avoid both Rock and Punk.
|
|
|
|
Post by srdkevin on Jan 27, 2013 23:57:39 GMT -5
It makes sense for the rock to be behind the shield!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2013 23:59:14 GMT -5
It makes sense for the rock to be behind the shield! Nah, one big flaw in that - why let Punk pin him then and hope Vince just happened to give him a rematch, then let Punk beat him to a pulp in the aftermath? If Rock had been gotten into the ring then like Cena on Raw 1,000 immediately got better and took out Punk to win, then it'd make sense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2013 0:00:11 GMT -5
Because they knew either way, Punk would lose the belt, and Rock would win it
|
|
