|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Jan 28, 2013 0:05:03 GMT -5
I think that Punk had the better reign because he went from face to heel during the halfway point of his run, and he lost it to the 3rd biggest star in wrestling history. Cena had a good title reign, but his title being stripped kind of ruined it for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2013 0:06:32 GMT -5
Cena's by far. Both ended anticlimactically, but other than when it eventually devolved into him defending it again Orton four times with a planned fifth, there was a wider variety of challengers many of whom were legitimate threats, and the match quality was generally better.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Jan 28, 2013 0:06:37 GMT -5
I would agree with most of that except for The Rock being the third biggest star in wrestling history, but that's subjective anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Starshine on Jan 28, 2013 0:12:09 GMT -5
IMO from both match quality, and storyline strength, it has to be Punk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Loser troll. Please ban me on Jan 28, 2013 0:16:50 GMT -5
Punk and it's not even close. Every ppv had me wondering if that was going to be the end.
I have parchment documents from 100 years ago that predicted the entirety of Cena's run.
|
|
|
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Jan 28, 2013 0:29:13 GMT -5
I HATED Cena's run after awhile. Punk's felt fresh the entire way through. New opponents left and right, the heel change (though his first half of the reign was definitely better), the reestablishment of the WWE title etc.
|
|
