Which one? Brock Lesnar never left WWE or Punk's Pipebomb?

[kidglov3s]

Aug 14, 2013 0:16:25 GMT -5 @nichotine said:

Aug 14, 2013 0:06:13 GMT -5 Straight Edge Scrotum said:

Brock sticking around.

Punk's promo was just him making the same cracks/criticisms that were all over the internet. And it meant nothing once Triple H and Nash got involved in the angle. I would have rather had some solid Brock matches throughout the years.

I still contend that the WWE would be a completely different place right now if not for Punk's pipebomb. I think he opened WWE's eyes to not completely writing off anyone but the old guard.

I'd rather have the pipe bomb. I think everything lined up really nicely in the end for Brock, it was totally surreal and awesome to see him kick ass in UFC for a while, and really the guy is such a unique talent, yet I think if he stuck in the WWE up to now it'd be easy to take him for granted like most guys end up in the nonstop world of WWE. Brock feels more special now than ever and as they continue to use him sparingly he hasn't lost his shine yet. His angles with Cena, Triple H and now CM Punk I don't think would have as much impact if it all took place in his six months and he just kept mowing through guys from there. Some people knock part timers but I really think it might slowly become the thing to do for a lot of guys,

I really feel this would be the way to get the most out of the roster. If everyone above a certain level was only around for like 1/4 of the year outside of Jan - April they'd all feel way more important and special, the way Lesnar/The Rock/HHH/Undertaker do now. I can't imagine they'd ever do that in a million years, though.

[Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster]

Lesnar going to the UFC and winning the heavyweight championship made his return last year 100 times more interesting. If he hadn't he would of most likely stayed 3 more years tops and then when he came back it would be been just another returning Superstar after going on hiatus for a few years.

So yeah Pipebomb.