gl83
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,233
Member is Online
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 15, 2013 0:46:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kamero00 on Aug 15, 2013 0:53:43 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2013 0:55:12 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? Bellas vs. Sable & Chyna, book it!
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,003
|
Post by Sparkybob on Aug 15, 2013 0:56:53 GMT -5
That has to be dirtsheets. They didn't mention the real stars of the show. Vincent, Fandango and VINTAGE Sebastian.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Aug 15, 2013 1:00:10 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? Bellas vs. Sable & Chyna, book it!
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Aug 15, 2013 1:00:23 GMT -5
Just put the damn title on one of them already and be done with it. Stop dragging it out.
|
|
|
Post by rnrk supports BLM on Aug 15, 2013 1:07:12 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? Having the top stars be the most popular performers? Perish the thought! Why, it's almost as though "workrate" is an arbitrary standard that's meaningless to the majority of WWE's audience!
|
|
gl83
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,233
Member is Online
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 15, 2013 1:13:28 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? Having the top stars be the most popular performers? Perish the thought! Why, it's almost as though "workrate" is an arbitrary standard that's meaningless to the majority of WWE's audience! The Bellas aren't even that popular. That distinction goes to AJ and Kaitlyn. So it's not just workrate where AJ/Kaitlyn have the Bellas beat.
|
|
FinalGwen
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Particularly fond of muffins.
Posts: 16,536
|
Post by FinalGwen on Aug 15, 2013 1:17:05 GMT -5
Y'know, this isn't such a bad thing. They've got their focus and spot on Total Divas, but they haven't really approached the title scene, which has mainly been left to the better wrestlers of the division. Hope they keep up the separation, and realise that both areas can give the females focus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2013 5:03:51 GMT -5
This is expert reporting right here. Good characters on a hit show's stock goes up, way to break the tough stories Pwinsider.
|
|
|
Post by rybackrulez on Aug 16, 2013 3:22:40 GMT -5
Having the top stars be the most popular performers? Perish the thought! Why, it's almost as though "workrate" is an arbitrary standard that's meaningless to the majority of WWE's audience! The Bellas aren't even that popular. That distinction goes to AJ and Kaitlyn. So it's not just workrate where AJ/Kaitlyn have the Bellas beat. To who exactly? To you? Eh. More divas being over is a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by thegame415 on Aug 16, 2013 3:43:21 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? No, because Sable and Sunny were over.
|
|
BigBadZ
Grimlock
The Rumors Are All True
Posts: 13,923
|
Post by BigBadZ on Aug 16, 2013 3:47:18 GMT -5
This is expert reporting right here. Good characters on a hit show's stock goes up, way to break the tough stories Pwinsider. John Cena must have the highest stock in WWE because he never sells..... I'm sorry......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 6:03:24 GMT -5
So WWE is happy with the people on the show that is getting really good ratings that keep going up? I for one am shocked.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 16:11:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Aug 16, 2013 16:22:44 GMT -5
They'll slip down the division once they start wrestling again and the live crowd remembers they are shit and their in-ring personas inspire nothing but apathy.
My advice to WWE is keep them doing the staged reality bollocks, and let the actual wrestling be focused on AJ, Kaitlyn and others.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 16:31:39 GMT -5
The Bellas aren't even that popular. That distinction goes to AJ and Kaitlyn. So it's not just workrate where AJ/Kaitlyn have the Bellas beat. To who exactly? To you? Eh. More divas being over is a good thing. To any live audience to ever exist.
|
|
BigWill
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 16,619
|
Post by BigWill on Aug 16, 2013 16:34:49 GMT -5
lol. They're terrible in the ring. What is this the late 90's again? Having the top stars be the most popular performers? Perish the thought! Why, it's almost as though "workrate" is an arbitrary standard that's meaningless to the majority of WWE's audience! But they're not the most popular performers. Total Divas ratings shouldn't mean anything when it comes to how popular the Bellas are as divas. When the Bella twins can actually get a pop from a live crowd, then we can start talking about them being top stars. But right now, wrestling fans don't give a crap about them as performers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 17:00:57 GMT -5
I don't mind the Bella twins
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Aug 16, 2013 17:10:20 GMT -5
The Bellas are fine on E! where they don't have to wrestle or engage a live crowd with their personalities.
When it comes to ring action, they are very limited, and their promos consist entirely of calling other women fat while rolling their eyes and doing that annoying "talk to the hand" bullshit.
Keep them away from the ring and the Divas title. Their participation on RAW should be a backstage segment where they plug their show and nothing else.
|
|