Chuck Conry
Dennis Stamp
zombies DON'T Run
Posts: 3,831
|
Post by Chuck Conry on Aug 18, 2013 22:25:58 GMT -5
Can't beat legends like Triple H, The Rock, and Brock Lesner..
He has beaten Cena and I THINK Undertaker at some point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerard Gerard on Aug 18, 2013 22:29:45 GMT -5
He did beat Rock, though. Twice. Obviously, at RR, it was The Shield, but he got a weird phantom pin on Rock at EC, where the ref was suddenly too busy checking on something outside the ring to bother counting; t'was absolutely bizarre.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2013 22:32:10 GMT -5
And?
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Aug 18, 2013 22:33:15 GMT -5
Hey, he's having the worst year of his life.
|
|
Chuck Conry
Dennis Stamp
zombies DON'T Run
Posts: 3,831
|
Post by Chuck Conry on Aug 18, 2013 22:33:21 GMT -5
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,003 
|
Post by Sparkybob on Aug 18, 2013 22:36:07 GMT -5
Well I don't see why he needs those wins. It's not like he's less over because of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by rnrk supports BLM on Aug 18, 2013 23:17:44 GMT -5
Why, it's almost like his nickname is a flamboyant hyperbole instead of a factual statement!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooklynpunk97 on Aug 19, 2013 0:35:04 GMT -5
I know, its complete bullshit.
If Cena is beating Lesnar and Rock, then Punk sure as hell should too. He's never going to beat Rock but I believe if Stone Cold comes back to face Punk, I believe Austin will do the right thing and lose to Punk.
Punk lost to Brock because they want to build Brock to a main event match at mania and to push Punk aside again to battle some upper mid card guy in the 3rd match on the card. God forbid Punk gets to win a meaningful match against a legend on a grand stage or beat Cena clean. Punk is a skinny fat ass, indy darling that Vince didnt create.
|
|
|
|
Post by Old Jack Burton on Aug 19, 2013 0:41:44 GMT -5
Well I don't see why he needs those wins. It's not like he's less over because of it. Being over ≠ Best in the World This thread is about the kayfabe Punk. In the last year he's lost to Brock, Taker, Cena, Rock, and HHH. His claims are on shaky ground after tonight, and it will be interesting to hear what he has to say about it on RAW. |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Aug 19, 2013 0:46:02 GMT -5
And what kind of a "beast" would Brock Lesnar be if he had lost in his third feud since coming back? I mean, he's supposed to be a big deal too, and if he lost to Cena, Triple H AND Punk...it pretty much kills the allure to this idea that he can do things that others can't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nic Nemeth on Aug 19, 2013 0:50:19 GMT -5
To be fair, Daniel Bryan is better than him so it's not like we're low on indy darlings.
|
|
Mista T
Unicron
THAT'S HARDCORE!!!1
Posts: 2,597
|
Post by Mista T on Aug 19, 2013 0:50:57 GMT -5
Punk even being in matches with "Legends" is a big deal though...he doesn't need to beat them every time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooklynpunk97 on Aug 19, 2013 0:54:45 GMT -5
And what kind of a "beast" would Brock Lesnar be if he had lost in his third feud since coming back? I mean, he's supposed to be a big deal too, and if he lost to Cena, Triple H AND Punk...it pretty much kills the allure to this idea that he can do things that others can't. Please, if they wanted the whole "Beast" moniker he would be undefeated. Lesnar at this point isnt a big deal. His shitty feud with HHH just made him look like a JAG for HHH. Lesnar is just gonna come back during Mania season, feud with Taker, Rock, or the WWE champ at the time and get a shot at them. Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by Banjo Is Broken on Aug 19, 2013 2:49:32 GMT -5
Good.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Aug 19, 2013 2:56:28 GMT -5
And what kind of a "beast" would Brock Lesnar be if he had lost in his third feud since coming back? I mean, he's supposed to be a big deal too, and if he lost to Cena, Triple H AND Punk...it pretty much kills the allure to this idea that he can do things that others can't. The thing is Brock doesn't care about winning. He just cares about destroying things. And in kayfabe, he isn't even employed by WWE. |
|
|
|
Post by muzzle on Aug 19, 2013 5:33:20 GMT -5
And what kind of a "beast" would Brock Lesnar be if he had lost in his third feud since coming back? I mean, he's supposed to be a big deal too, and if he lost to Cena, Triple H AND Punk...it pretty much kills the allure to this idea that he can do things that others can't. Technically, Brock did win the HHH fued. |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Aug 19, 2013 7:25:44 GMT -5
Losing to Brock in a screwy finish doesn't make him a worse wrestler. Unless you're just about the check being in the right column.
|
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 24,190
Member is Online
|
Post by Bo Rida on Aug 19, 2013 7:48:45 GMT -5
I think it's fair to say that over the past few years WWE have portrayed Punk, Cena, Brock, Rock, HHH and The Undertaker as their six biggest stars.
Even though he's picked up some wins along the way he's ultimately lost his feuds against four of them. Now he's lost a match to Lesnar too, if he doesn't go on to win the feud he looks like a guy that can't back up what he claims to be.
|
|
