BigBadZ
Grimlock
The Rumors Are All True
Posts: 13,923
|
Post by BigBadZ on Sept 16, 2013 2:03:03 GMT -5
When you're right, you're right. But yea as far as greatest WWE champs, I'd put The Rock and Randy Savage over Triple H and CM Punk. But no one is better than Hogan in that category. Booker T. looked legit shocked when they did that segment after the Punk/Heyman match. |
|
|
|
Post by The Portable Stove on Sept 16, 2013 2:42:22 GMT -5
I would have been fine with either Hogan and Austin. Hell, I voted for Hogan. Regardless of what you think of the man, his WWF Title reign is what got a lot of people into wrestling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Snaptastic on Sept 16, 2013 8:00:31 GMT -5
Funny result. Although I'm trying to work out if they were WWE's top 5 of all time. As I'd easily put in Rock & Foley into that poll ahead of Triple H for starters. Hell ahead of Cena in some respects as I can't think of a memorable Cena reign...ever. I get why Punk is in there with the lengthy reign, but HHH & Cena are questionable. Cena had a reign that was almost as long as Punk's and has pretty much personified the championship for the past 10 years. How is that questionable? Because it wasn't as long as Punk, and Cena is only notable by how many reigns he's had. Each of his reigns however have been unremarkable in every shape as far as I can remember. There's more deserving people. Just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Sept 16, 2013 8:25:13 GMT -5
Cena had a reign that was almost as long as Punk's and has pretty much personified the championship for the past 10 years. How is that questionable? Because it wasn't as long as Punk, and Cena is only notable by how many reigns he's had. Each of his reigns however have been unremarkable in every shape as far as I can remember. There's more deserving people. Just my opinion. The only people that I would put over Cena on the WWE title list are Hogan, Austin, Bruno and MAYBE Rock and that would be on sheer popularity during his runs. Plus the WWE title was literally HIS belt until earlier this year. Triple H being on there is strange though. I always thought of him as more of a WHC guy because of 2003. |
|
|
|
Post by rybackrulez on Sept 16, 2013 12:13:11 GMT -5
I like how even after years of revisionist history (from both WWE and smarks) trying to downplay him, Hogan still completely annihilated everyone else in the poll. Hulk should have crushed everybody Booker winning was the buggest lol of the night |
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Sept 16, 2013 12:37:21 GMT -5
I hope HHH gets a 4% chant later
|
|
|
|
Post by "American Nightmare" B.B. Bart on Sept 16, 2013 12:38:04 GMT -5
I hope HHH gets a 4% chant later That and a "4 out of 10" chant would be amazing. |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Sept 16, 2013 13:31:20 GMT -5
I'd have Triple H as a better champion than The Rock. The Rock had virtually no good reigns. He had good matches, rivalries and promos, but not good reigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Gambler Fan on Sept 16, 2013 16:33:33 GMT -5
Rude should have been on the greatest US champions list not the greatest IC champion list. His IC title reign was kind of forgettable he beat Warrior but then lost it to him on the next PPV. His US title reign was amazing it last over a year and he never lost it. He had to give up the title due to an injury.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 16:55:32 GMT -5
At least Triple H can take solace in his run with Michaels in 2009-2010 being the greatest tag title reign of all time. He'll always have that. I can honestly tell you that I didn't even know he and Michaels were tag champions.......well, ever. And I'm pretty sure I was watching a bit then too. Also, I think if the word "twerk" was on one of those polls for no reason, it'd have garnered many votes and probably won. These kids today.......yeesh. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 16:57:29 GMT -5
At least Triple H can take solace in his run with Michaels in 2009-2010 being the greatest tag title reign of all time. He'll always have that. I can honestly tell you that I didn't even know he and Michaels were tag champions.......well, ever. And I'm pretty sure I was watching a bit then too. Could've blinked and missed it. Their run basically consisted of winning them from Jerishow at TLC, facing them a few times in matches where they weirdly seemed to be playing the heels given they kept having Hornswoggle interfere or getting themselves DQed or whatever, then they lost them to Show-Miz entirely to hype up the whole, "Michaels is obsessed with Undertaker!" storyline. |
|
|
|
Post by SeVeN: #TheBadGuy. on Sept 16, 2013 17:41:06 GMT -5
I like how even after years of revisionist history (from both WWE and smarks) trying to downplay him, Hogan still completely annihilated everyone else in the poll. You just can't kill Hulkamania, brother. It will never grow old and it will never die. But it must feed. |
|
