|
Post by rybackrulez on Oct 22, 2013 1:30:44 GMT -5
That's not really much of a pickup line though. Kanye said the same thing in an easier to digest package: Love is cursed by monogamy. Five words, keep it simple. Ladies will prefer it. It works better when you have money If there was anything better than pussy, god is keeping to himself
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2013 8:01:57 GMT -5
I hold mixed feelings of rnvy and disgust for Punk at times. You can't help but be a but jealous if the list of amazing women he has been involved with-but he also seems like a man-s---who can't just can't committ and he a one woman man. Monogamy is an invention of convenience, economics and security. It's not really necessary anymore to the progress of the human race. No it's not. Monogamy is practiced by a wide range of species besides humans. Not only does it guarantee the integrity of all progeny produced by a pairing of mates (if practiced properly), it also strengthens bonds of kinship and, more important in the modern era than ever, trust. There is probably no better exercise of trust than honest monogamy and if the two partners have true feelings for each other, then there is absolutely nothing to worry about between them. Now we have feelings that compel us away from monogamy at times, but it's a manner of discipline the same way that it's discipline not to do drugs, or binge drink, or eat a ridiculous amount of food everyday. Some people are weak minded fools. And they can be that way if they want. But just because they can be that doesn't mean that other people can't practice monogamy and reap its tremendous benefits.
|
|
trollrogue
Hank Scorpio
Nashville City of Music!!
Posts: 5,614
|
Post by trollrogue on Oct 22, 2013 13:38:36 GMT -5
Monogamy is an invention of convenience, economics and security. It's not really necessary anymore to the progress of the human race. No it's not. Monogamy is practiced by a wide range of species besides humans. Not only does it guarantee the integrity of all progeny produced by a pairing of mates (if practiced properly), it also strengthens bonds of kinship and, more important in the modern era than ever, trust. There is probably no better exercise of trust than honest monogamy and if the two partners have true feelings for each other, then there is absolutely nothing to worry about between them. Now we have feelings that compel us away from monogamy at times, but it's a manner of discipline the same way that it's discipline not to do drugs, or binge drink, or eat a ridiculous amount of food everyday. Some people are weak minded fools. And they can be that way if they want. But just because they can be that doesn't mean that other people can't practice monogamy and reap its tremendous benefits. So... basically you agree that it's an invention of convenience, economics and security then? It also helps that everything in society is practically tailored for the nuclear family. If you choose to remain single for life, you end up working 300% harder than a married person does to obtain the same things. Regular sex being the main one of those things
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2013 14:32:15 GMT -5
No it's not. Monogamy is practiced by a wide range of species besides humans. Not only does it guarantee the integrity of all progeny produced by a pairing of mates (if practiced properly), it also strengthens bonds of kinship and, more important in the modern era than ever, trust. There is probably no better exercise of trust than honest monogamy and if the two partners have true feelings for each other, then there is absolutely nothing to worry about between them. Now we have feelings that compel us away from monogamy at times, but it's a manner of discipline the same way that it's discipline not to do drugs, or binge drink, or eat a ridiculous amount of food everyday. Some people are weak minded fools. And they can be that way if they want. But just because they can be that doesn't mean that other people can't practice monogamy and reap its tremendous benefits. So... basically you agree that it's an invention of convenience, economics and security then? It also helps that everything in society is practically tailored for the nuclear family. If you choose to remain single for life, you end up working 300% harder than a married person does to obtain the same things. Regular sex being the main one of those things I don't think the term "invention" is an adequate way of putting it. That supposes that the natural method for humans to reproduce involves self-fertilization or polygamy, and neither is true (one of them is outright impossible...at least before modern technology ).
|
|
|
Post by Wolfman Rose on Oct 22, 2013 14:59:18 GMT -5
Actually, monogamy is only practiced by ~3% of mammals. So, we are very much the exception to the rule.
|
|
SEAN CARLESS
Hank Scorpio
More of a B+ player, actually
I'm Necessary Evil.
Posts: 5,770
|
Post by SEAN CARLESS on Oct 22, 2013 15:12:22 GMT -5
Monogamy is an invention of convenience, economics and security. It's not really necessary anymore to the progress of the human race. No it's not. Monogamy is practiced by a wide range of species besides humans. Not only does it guarantee the integrity of all progeny produced by a pairing of mates (if practiced properly), it also strengthens bonds of kinship and, more important in the modern era than ever, trust. There is probably no better exercise of trust than honest monogamy and if the two partners have true feelings for each other, then there is absolutely nothing to worry about between them. Now we have feelings that compel us away from monogamy at times, but it's a manner of discipline the same way that it's discipline not to do drugs, or binge drink, or eat a ridiculous amount of food everyday. Some people are weak minded fools. And they can be that way if they want. But just because they can be that doesn't mean that other people can't practice monogamy and reap its tremendous benefits. I'm not denying that love exists, and through that, you can find a soul-mate whom you are content to spend the rest of your life with. I'm simply saying that for most of our existence, monogamy was for the exact reasons I stated. Women were literally handed off like chattel to would-be husbands like a brokered business deal, in turn for security. The man received offspring and basically (and unfairly) an indentured servant with no legal rights; and the woman got a roof over her head, since for 95% of our existence, employment opportunities were nonexistent for them. Women had little to no choice in the matter. Even marriages amongst the rich were done so without any female input, other than said man was the best monetary deal. And today, the practice is broken. Like 75% of them fail. If you told me, that if I jumped out of a plane, I'd only have a 25% of my chute opening, I wouldn't do it. I just don't think people are wired to last that way in most cases (maybe they choose the wrong people), with all the things I mentioned being equally available these days. A woman literally does not need a man for anything these days, if she so chooses. And I feel like people often get married for stupid reasons, ranging from economical laziness, (like gold-digging), or trying to fit into cultural norms and social expectations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2013 15:25:07 GMT -5
No it's not. Monogamy is practiced by a wide range of species besides humans. Not only does it guarantee the integrity of all progeny produced by a pairing of mates (if practiced properly), it also strengthens bonds of kinship and, more important in the modern era than ever, trust. There is probably no better exercise of trust than honest monogamy and if the two partners have true feelings for each other, then there is absolutely nothing to worry about between them. Now we have feelings that compel us away from monogamy at times, but it's a manner of discipline the same way that it's discipline not to do drugs, or binge drink, or eat a ridiculous amount of food everyday. Some people are weak minded fools. And they can be that way if they want. But just because they can be that doesn't mean that other people can't practice monogamy and reap its tremendous benefits. I'm not denying that love exists, and through that, you can find a soul-mate whom you are content to spend the rest of your life with. I'm simply saying that for most of our existence, monogamy was for the exact reasons I stated. Women were literally handed off like chattel to would-be husbands like a brokered business deal, in turn for security. The man received offspring and basically (and unfairly) an indentured servant with no legal rights; and the woman got a roof over her head, since for 95% of our existence, employment opportunities were nonexistent for them. Women had little to no choice in the matter. Even marriages amongst the rich were done so without any female input, other than said man was the best monetary deal. And today, the practice is broken. Like 75% of them fail. If you told me, that if I jumped out of a plane, I'd only have a 25% of my chute opening, I wouldn't do it. I just don't think people are wired to last that way in most cases (maybe they choose the wrong people), with all the things I mentioned being equally available these days. A woman literally does not need a man for anything these days, if she so chooses. And I feel like people often get married for stupid reasons, ranging from economical laziness, (like gold-digging), or trying to fit into cultural norms and social expectations. Institutional monogamous marriage is a little different than basic monogamy. Monogamy can include marriage, but marriage does not necessarily include monogamy. I don't think that monogamy and monogamous marriage are ineffective--with economics as bad as they are right now, the reasons for families to be built up and stay together are as strong now as they've been for over 50 years. But I do think the "stupid reasons" you mentioned have a lot to do with it. People just hook up thinking they've found a storybook romance without really seeking true compatibility and of course, it blows up in their faces. But I think that's more on the people than monogamy itself.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Oct 22, 2013 23:38:05 GMT -5
A new challenger appears!
|
|
|
Post by turkeysandwich on Oct 22, 2013 23:41:11 GMT -5
A new challenger appears! I guess Punk is kind of a real life Dude Love, minus the tie-dye and dancing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 0:20:09 GMT -5
A new challenger appears! If I can be like Punk, maybe... Just maybe... I'll gain some of his mojo. That settles it, I'm getting a Snapple tattoo immediately.
|
|
|
Post by rybackrulez on Oct 23, 2013 0:22:33 GMT -5
Jeez punk is a guy younger women want
Bad attitude Quick wit Tall Tatoos And possibly has a big penis
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Oct 23, 2013 1:52:11 GMT -5
A new challenger appears! I guess Punk is kind of a real life Dude Love, minus the tie-dye and dancing. It's on his body rather than just on his shirt.
|
|
BigJerichool222
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
THE BIG DOG!
#NotInMySalad
Posts: 17,424
|
Post by BigJerichool222 on Oct 23, 2013 2:05:13 GMT -5
And possibly has a big penis I can personally verify that Punk has a nice sized penis. {Spoiler}...only because I watched the Maria YouShoot years ago and she said so.
|
|
|
Post by ________ has left the building on Oct 23, 2013 15:10:26 GMT -5
A new challenger appears! I guess Punk is kind of a real life Dude Love, minus the tie-dye and dancing. Guess Mick his going to have to keep an eye on his daughter at Wrestlemania.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,003
|
Post by Sparkybob on Oct 23, 2013 15:36:40 GMT -5
I guess Punk is kind of a real life Dude Love, minus the tie-dye and dancing. Guess Mick his going to have to keep an eye on his daughter at Wrestlemania. You mean for survivor series, Punk doesn't fool around when it comes to attractive females.
|
|
|
Post by rybackrulez on Oct 23, 2013 16:59:52 GMT -5
I guess Punk is kind of a real life Dude Love, minus the tie-dye and dancing. Guess Mick his going to have to keep an eye on his daughter at Wrestlemania. Man that is hilarious "hey mick, bang bang hahah" "what was that about?" "hey dad"
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Oct 23, 2013 17:07:11 GMT -5
A new challenger appears! My life is f***ing ruined.
|
|
543Y2J
Patti Mayonnaise
Seventh level .gif Master
Posts: 38,794
|
Post by 543Y2J on Oct 23, 2013 19:03:54 GMT -5
Just a little trip down memory lane....
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Oct 23, 2013 19:25:19 GMT -5
I guess we can add another one to Punk's list. He's had Traci Brooks, Daffney, Mickie, Maria, Kelly Kelly, Beth, Lita, and now AJ. Am I forgetting anyone? It's kinda odd AJ is dating Punk now right after Lita, seeing as she was AJ's idol. Either way, good for them.
|
|
Chip
Hank Scorpio
Slam Jam Death.
Posts: 5,185
|
Post by Chip on Oct 23, 2013 19:29:27 GMT -5
I guess we can add another one to Punk's list. He's had Traci Brooks, Daffney, Mickie, Maria, Kelly Kelly, Beth, Lita, and now AJ. This confirms it, Punks dick is cursed. Nobody who's been with him is still with the company, time for the AJ Alliance to get paranoid.
|
|