Should Rumble go on last?

[Boo!]

In my view the Rumble should ALWAYS be the last match and this year a lot of heat was taken out of it given that it was essentially a mid-card Rumble.

[CATCH_US IS the Conversation]

It should. But last year was an exception because of The Rock.

[Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!!]

yes. even if the winner's lame, there's pretty much no way to follow a match like that. even Triple H in his "title match should always go last" mentality isn't that stupid.

[The Ichi]

Yes, though I get why they did it like that this year. You can't really have Rock winning the title for the first time in 11 years and Punks 434 day reign of terror ending play second fiddle to a guy pointing at a sign.

[Sparkybob]

It should unless there is some amazing dream match happening on the same show like this year's rumble. Angle vs Henry should never main event even if it was for Taker murdering the ring.

[Deleted]

I get why Rock's match went on last this year, but I'd still say the Rumble should always close the show. There's usually not a big WWE title match like that at the Rumble, so this year was a different situation and I can't fault them.

[Hit Girl]

Yes, always

[fw91]

yep

[Deleted]

Considering that it's called the "Royal Rumble" the rumble should always be the feature unless it's some super moneymaking dream match.